Received: from mail-pv0-f189.google.com ([74.125.83.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OATV0-000393-Rf; Fri, 07 May 2010 12:46:22 -0700 Received: by pvg6 with SMTP id 6sf352107pvg.16 for ; Fri, 07 May 2010 12:46:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received :sender:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=XMFJifyw+U+cIa36hDhyKPFHV98uQ8dB1tH/j3YWCY0=; b=sk0RWqEE3jCvFeIKrANKMvo9HKZ1xBo44tVuPYfdDZKfj4KNPnhRvIDkjS20pAxb1x 15f1KrxxcBb/vjihaxWXMLUi5tU4nwnMN4gW2NTNMLauy+1SG7FFeWc4NnOlPu+8Q4Ca Oj9zI+bZjWHSwxK4jTA+2HtFCKDlIc+r0ogVQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; b=BHYAyjBGd5BF08YTedmwTLtJrYGb2EUCo/kNKAKPrLX5hViDhXw0SE+eMr50GRnmOy xSFNz9tgvjo4VOZqrYlrsW6zR/xiZsT5oVd+O8WfOCSdK1/kLNKDo0zkrwrhdQhNF+4b AMi1tHLEWpm+Q1RKRRtC03qIjkadXvYAomwZI= Received: by 10.140.83.37 with SMTP id g37mr57610rvb.14.1273261566846; Fri, 07 May 2010 12:46:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.141.13.11 with SMTP id q11ls9180048rvi.3.p; Fri, 07 May 2010 12:46:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.83.9 with SMTP id g9mr56440rvb.5.1273261566301; Fri, 07 May 2010 12:46:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.91.150.2 with SMTP id c2mr429677ago.13.1273216732232; Fri, 07 May 2010 00:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.91.150.2 with SMTP id c2mr429674ago.13.1273216732184; Fri, 07 May 2010 00:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f194.google.com (mail-qy0-f194.google.com [209.85.221.194]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si154098gxk.7.2010.05.07.00.18.51; Fri, 07 May 2010 00:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pascal.akihiko@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.194 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.221.194; Received: by mail-qy0-f194.google.com with SMTP id 32so1371622qyk.0 for ; Fri, 07 May 2010 00:18:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.245.68 with SMTP id lt4mr6186475qcb.71.1273216731000; Fri, 07 May 2010 00:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.1.222 with HTTP; Fri, 7 May 2010 00:18:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2035EAA2-54C5-4259-BC7C-497A1CA2A4F5@mac.com> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 08:18:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Proposed change to smart.fm items From: tijlan To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of pascal.akihiko@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.194 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pascal.akihiko@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: pascal.akihiko@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f9a73ef930770485fbdec2 Content-Length: 3647 --001485f9a73ef930770485fbdec2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 7 May 2010 08:13, tijlan wrote: > On 6 May 2010 20:34, Luke Bergen wrote: > >> hmmm. So tijlan, you say that you see {lo plise} as being an implicit >> abstraction of the form {lo nu da plise}. But then you say that it doesn't >> make sense to say {mi nelci lo plise} because {lo plise} is not an >> abstraction. Pick a lane already =p >> > > I'm not saying that {mi nelci lo plise} doesn't make sense. I'm saying: > > 1) the assumption that "an object and an event are different" does not > reflect what "an object" actually is > > and therefore > > 2) the assumption that some particular sumti should be *either* "an > object" or "a state" does not make sense. > "state" and "event" are interchangeabale in this case. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --001485f9a73ef930770485fbdec2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 7 May 2010 08:13, tijlan &l= t;jbotijlan@gmail.com>= wrote:
On 6 May 2010 20:34, Luke Berg= en <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
hmmm. =A0So tijlan, you say that you see {lo plise} as being an implicit ab= straction of the form {lo nu da plise}. =A0But then you say that it doesn&#= 39;t make sense to say {mi nelci lo plise} because {lo plise} is not an abs= traction. =A0Pick a lane already =A0=3Dp

I'm not saying that {mi nelci lo plise} doe= sn't make sense. I'm saying:

=A01) the assumption that "= ;an object and an event are different" does not reflect what "an = object" actually is

and therefore

=A02) the assumption that some particular sumti sh= ould be *either* "an object" or "a state" does not make= sense.

"state" and "ev= ent" are interchangeabale in this case.