Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OJVrl-0002RW-UC; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:07:18 -0700 Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12sf5736882gwa.16 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:06:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=2teRzQnc0diwRTPtIqe6nzMqvL/iR2F0IOBb3z1nr2Q=; b=5UxXbISv3umatupWFcg8R/o5pYzHSJ1DExeFiFcjgfKXipmFsyLE3wfilp0W5cam/3 glrvm/coFVR2AXK5RtaNQ6nZ4Il821+8fLczGgqd37ktPzpqZv0icoL8UrBF6qM6YCbv 6WYr7ssaqnEJRtjln9GYo87gIC3RDHkxxVpoE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=1CTLHFcuOg3/lViqw3yEEX2aX6e76p8nYNz13VoLx1Tq+taHQDsETp7iiDQ4nmAwex xsRkceGecnnG0r5KzP3+woptHE7sa38NCfYF3bb5syFcY16iseE+/yR6wViN9PC050fT jD3FkmiR4rl2KCHtmTnqHKcE0P5ZRf3EwdySY= Received: by 10.101.175.14 with SMTP id c14mr189153anp.34.1275415614358; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:06:54 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.11.8 with SMTP id o8ls1588712ani.6.p; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.180.38 with SMTP id h38mr2192664anp.33.1275415613248; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.180.38 with SMTP id h38mr2192659anp.33.1275415612652; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-f175.google.com (mail-yw0-f175.google.com [209.85.211.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id z17si5494746ank.5.2010.06.01.11.06.51; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.211.175; Received: by mail-yw0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 5so4111285ywh.13 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:06:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.186.142 with SMTP id cs14mr1102895qcb.10.1275415611178; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.142.6 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:06:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 14:06:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Something is place xi because... From: Ian Johnson To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630ff457201da0487fbd6da Content-Length: 5767 --00163630ff457201da0487fbd6da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Can you explain a little more about them not being what I want to say? Also, how does that work exactly? The x3 itself is justified, but here the x3 would be a number (in my example 0)...in what sense can 0 be justified? mu'o mi'e latros. On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Ian Johnson wrote: > >> Is there a (preferably compact) way to say not: >> {ko'a broda ko'e ko'i} because .... >> but instead: >> {ko'a broda ko'e ko'i} and {ko'i} is the x3 of broda because ... >> >> The specific situation I'm thinking of is with {pacna}, justifying why the >> x3 is what it is. I was saying something like "x1 hopes for x2 with expected >> outcome x3 and the expected outcome is what it is because ..." Saying that >> the {pacna} predicate as a whole is justified by this thing isn't quite >> right, because the x1 doesn't hope for x2 for that reason, and in fact the >> reason x1 would hope for x2 would probably be a {se mukti}, whereas this >> reason might be, say, a {se rinka} (perhaps if x1 hopes for a physical >> impossibility, which is what came up in this case). >> >> mu'o mi'e latros. >> >> > ko'a broda ko'e ko'i poi se rinka/mukti ... Seems to be he most > straightforward, I guess, but your particular examples seems to not really > be what you want to say.... > > --gejyspa > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --00163630ff457201da0487fbd6da Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can you explain a little more about them not being what I want to say?
<= br>Also, how does that work exactly? The x3 itself is justified, but here t= he x3 would be a number (in my example 0)...in what sense can 0 be justifie= d?

mu'o mi'e latros.

On Tue, Jun= 1, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
=


On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at= 12:20 AM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
Is there a (preferably compact) way to say not:
{ko'a broda ko'e= ko'i} because ....
but instead:
{ko'a broda ko'e ko'= ;i} and {ko'i} is the x3 of broda because ...

The specific situa= tion I'm thinking of is with {pacna}, justifying why the x3 is what it = is. I was saying something like "x1 hopes for x2 with expected outcome= x3 and the expected outcome is what it is because ..." Saying that th= e {pacna} predicate as a whole is justified by this thing isn't quite r= ight, because the x1 doesn't hope for x2 for that reason, and in fact t= he reason x1 would hope for x2 would probably be a {se mukti}, whereas this= reason might be, say, a {se rinka} (perhaps if x1 hopes for a physical imp= ossibility, which is what came up in this case).

mu'o mi'e latros.


=A0 ko'a broda ko'e ko'i poi= se rinka/mukti ... =A0Seems to be he most straightforward, I guess, but yo= ur particular examples seems to not really be what you want to say....

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0--gejyspa

=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--00163630ff457201da0487fbd6da--