Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OtdHJ-0008E8-1J; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:18:49 -0700 Received: by ywp4 with SMTP id 4sf170911ywp.16 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:18:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received :received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=1AiAYiADwlOidP4bH0fatvfXC6u/Lt1Nj6hj9sk+elg=; b=FzUUgXLBWCH8Asa9rf10ZYrubKZ+b4EtuFVGmv/4mkA/fW7jaXwnq3LXhTtGaEdAC6 hHSGOUVYX9duKOzLq6PuyF3WtS27u5EIvFX1pOX+lKx8tH8+JJEidZBWC/gagjcJwchT Hx8jtz4gv9LrgIMbzyC2NteD40/e/zb5Up/ik= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=xfM+wp/OnKjGmIW2qe8XQwO2gG9/bS7gM8g5/tWDFZw1H9u1uIBKJbI1vv6BFO25vR xmxi6H+5vHEHiLPQBepy55GG9ZuaA6vmEYmWtRdFoenmbqwHfV/6Pc5BhSZ5FxxjEQZK 9/t0Sya1rIOW8O9xR0tjlTjsVNuRhm4ReVe6o= Received: by 10.91.43.20 with SMTP id v20mr1366904agj.43.1284023893971; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:18:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.150.48.3 with SMTP id v3ls1581274ybv.5.p; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.143.19 with SMTP id v19mr2311734ybn.33.1284023893041; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.150.223 with SMTP id z73mr398880wej.0.1283953690225; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.150.223 with SMTP id z73mr398879wej.0.1283953690189; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com (mail-ww0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m11si15788wej.7.2010.09.08.06.48.09; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of fagricipni@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.52; Received: by mail-ww0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 28so41082wwb.9 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:48:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.133.7 with SMTP id d7mr95400wbt.54.1283953681476; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.63.131 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 06:48:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8828dfa1-793d-46f1-8263-21fe256accfb@s17g2000prh.googlegroups.com> References: <8828dfa1-793d-46f1-8263-21fe256accfb@s17g2000prh.googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:48:01 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Best Word for Humanoid? From: "H. Felton" To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: fagricipni@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of fagricipni@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=fagricipni@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1991 On 9/8/10, Lindar wrote: > simsa remna - a similar human-thing. Definitely not what you want. x1 of the tanru selbri has to fit in x1 of the tertau: x1 is human -- now I see how that doesn't work. > remna jibni - It isn't -quite- human, but it's close. Pretty insulting > if you ask me. Not necessarily: it can be non-human simply by not being inter-fertile with Homo sapiens, but yet superior to humans as well (and still similar, of course); at one time it seemed likely that natural evolution would cause the descendants of modern humans a few million years from now to fall into that category -- however, barring some collapse of civilization in which even the current knowledge of basic science and technology is lost, it now seems that *natural* evolution will not have its way with us; *design* will be the way of the (distant) future. > remna simsa - human-ish similar-thing. Sounds reasonable to me! It appears that the difference between "jibni" and "simsa" is that things can be similar by being identical, but "near" does not include being identical. As far as place structures, x1 of simsa is the thing that is similar to something; ie, x1 is similar to x2 (in property), with x2 being inferred to be lo remna. That does make more sense than "simsa remna" for the meaning that I want; "remna jibni" can be rejected because it excludes the possibility that x1 is not just similar to lo remna, but, in fact, a lo remna without a the qualification of jibni. > remsmi - x1(r1=s1(=s2)) is a humanoid / is humanoid (adjective) / is > human-like in quality x2=s3 "remsmi" it is, then. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.