Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ow1v0-0004rH-4U; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:01:42 -0700 Received: by vws6 with SMTP id 6sf553444vws.16 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:01:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=PZ0VxB49zDm0j0gScRfYuaOmVGlDASU6NZ1H0bachYs=; b=6L+puDeGKSd5ZKV0ytfrn1CpuslwA50vMb2TNUxo9CGDPfy6UxTTKf7SPzHz9EZwkC Qx3k8uw+YvO55UXt/GCnwV8OATqLa9IJZV/Rb2+sM+RgjC1K8zaeXfzUH1MDPk5b+TVL R6L1biHIYN7ircTRB4OXyIpDLxaHjg3Bz9jAI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=Ixo8yIrHwD8t8bpSLszovwzM7/Qbu0bKTQU9xEfJFS78JHfU/WiwPR65f0B3BqMy1/ TzdNhNjvZSpLME0RYKaKAjT61d3URoiZKhOqTJLXwUWwaF6nfmrdQJfU5y3BoxtCevNk nYAEzyCMuPePNw5X22kl0lJWxX9CMEsodpSBc= Received: by 10.220.124.154 with SMTP id u26mr168588vcr.39.1284595268570; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:01:08 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.43.71 with SMTP id v7ls432270vce.5.p; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.193.75 with SMTP id dt11mr596871vcb.14.1284595267357; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.193.75 with SMTP id dt11mr596870vcb.14.1284595267328; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m11si256430vcf.8.2010.09.15.17.01.06; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.53; Received: by mail-qw0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 5so612738qwe.40 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:01:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.87.134 with SMTP id w6mr1586104qcl.297.1284595266172; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.101.208 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:01:06 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Cauchy sequences From: Ian Johnson To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ef5058539f40490552420 Content-Length: 2782 --0016364ef5058539f40490552420 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I found myself being lazy in my analysis class having to repeatedly write: Let x in R. Suppose {x_k} is a Cauchy sequence representing x. I was trying to come up with a good word to use to represent this clunky relation, that is: x1 is a Cauchy sequence representing the real number x2. The thing I came up with first was pretty bad, but I didn't have a dictionary on me. It was {listrkoci}. Once I got to a dictionary I thought of {porsrkoci}, which seems a bit better. Does anyone have any better ideas? Maybe something that isn't a fu'ivla? To clarify, this should hold, if broda is assigned to this relation: li pa ce'o li pa fi'u re ce'o li pa fi'u ci ce'o ... broda li no (sorry that I don't know a good way to say "et cetera ad infinitum" in lojban.) .i ki'e .i mu'o mi'e latros. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --0016364ef5058539f40490552420 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I found myself being lazy in my analysis class having to repeatedly write:<= div>Let x in R. Suppose {x_k} is a Cauchy sequence representing x.I was trying to come up with a good word to use to represent this clunky = relation, that is:
x1 is a Cauchy sequence representing the real number x2.
The= thing I came up with first was pretty bad, but I didn't have a diction= ary on me. It was {listrkoci}. Once I got to a dictionary I thought of {por= srkoci}, which seems a bit better. Does anyone have any better ideas? Maybe= something that isn't a fu'ivla?=A0

To clarify, this should hold, if broda is assigned to t= his relation:
li pa ce'o li pa fi'u re ce'o li pa fi&= #39;u ci ce'o ... broda li no
(sorry that I don't know a = good way to say "et cetera ad infinitum" in lojban.)

.i ki'e .i mu'o mi'e latros.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0016364ef5058539f40490552420--