Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3Kg0-0002US-5f; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:28:24 -0700 Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11sf5241394gwb.16 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:28:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dFh2d//IZ3yy7MTWc1gE9ikB8UHzJwDlFukMIJCwD+4=; b=v9ZarXO3XL1WFx8xfceCQuXgU5/bujXGC+jLsm8j45+RG1l8P5pA24btuntMCd1rhH mLYMtjw+r1vf6x7Wpw2gIY3OgTWaJpf3BUk9woQXaiKxruziowQdKyhGVFiEWnWe197t AR8RqVgytVp5FgxqY7Vurj3EVXyBzrLeRHKZI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=ib2K2BN0PrhP5QqAULzPnZaSUHc8ZL3wexZ7LnZ/NQQz6YqIarhNF6+NWrYIkDjM/E L0SIXyKz2SzABNL8c5nXQi7i/rtVJ9wg+KUZSSBWuIrsVAyacu0g/rakjnXLY3WiJvvv bahTaTmUkzvytpcyHPlVYKXQtv/XkIjwtFM74= Received: by 10.90.18.6 with SMTP id 6mr76333agr.38.1286335674825; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:54 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.55.74 with SMTP id t10ls3504302ibg.3.p; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.58.206 with SMTP id i14mr3013060ibh.0.1286335673969; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.58.206 with SMTP id i14mr3013057ibh.0.1286335673907; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com (mail-iw0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id db12si206519ibb.1.2010.10.05.20.27.52; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.171; Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so990106iwn.2 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.146.135 with SMTP id h7mr13191976ibv.149.1286335672388; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.48.79 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:27:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:27:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] A suggestion for the Lojban names of weekdays and months. From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485e2eb20d0908f0491ea5ca0 Content-Length: 11480 --001485e2eb20d0908f0491ea5ca0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I like it. My only comment is, what's wrong with cmevla? Why not make them .djepav. etc... Given xorxes' other proposal about merging cmevla into brivla, this wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing (assuming that I understand his other proposal well enough) and it wouldn't be infringing on the gismu space (not that I'm all that uncomfortable with that). On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > (I'm double-posting this to both lojban lists, please respond on the > beginner's.) > ----- > Days: > ----- > > A discussion about the names of the weekdays was recently held in the > thread "[lojban] la za'e filjvocedra (The Age of Easy Lujvo)", about the > pros and cons of the two current methods of naming the days of the week - > one based on numbers, the other on concepts. {pavdei} "1-day" = {lurdei} > "moon-day", to provide an example. > > In this discussion, .xorxes. pointed out that the current number method is > anti-intuitive, because it seems as though, for example {mumdei} would mean > "five days", not "fifth day". As corollary, he pointed out two examples: > {reljeftu}, "fortnight", and {mumymentu}, "five minutes". To quote him, > "[T]he place structure of {djedi} screams for 'N-dei' to mean {djedi be li > N}, not {djedi me'e li N}." > > Personally, I found this to be a very convincing argument against the use > of {pavdei} et al. as names of weekdays. It is also, if I am correct, his > main reason for preferring the concept way. > > I, on the other hand, do not like the concept method, for the simple reason > that I really, really like having a systematic method, and that is anything > but. After more discussion, I came up with the following, which is agreeable > to both .xorxes. and me. > > It's actually basically the exact same thing as {pavdei}, etc., except > backwards. So, they would be: > > {djeno} "0-day"/{djeze} "7-day" = Sunday > {djepa} "1-day" = Monday > {djere} "2-day" = Tuesday > {djeci} "3-day" = Wednesday > {djevo} "4-day" = Thursday > {djemu} "5-day" = Friday > {djexa} "6-day" = Saturday > > All eight of the above words have the exact same meaning as both current > methods: "x1 is a [weekday name] of week x2 in month x3" > > The benefits of this method are that it is logical, systematic, and doesn't > conflict with spans (as in {mumdei} = "a five day span"). > > The con is, obviously, they take up 8 spots in gismu space, which may or > may not be an atrocity, depending on your viewpoint. > > ----- > Months: > ----- > > Through further discussion, we have also come up with a really good method > for month-naming. Currently, the only Lojban words we have for the months > are cmevla, i.e. {.pamast.}, {.remast.}, etc. .xorxes. came up with a really > good alternative, similar to my idea with the weeks, for each of the months, > which are the following fu'ivla, based around {lunra}: > > {lunrapa} "1-month" = January > {lunrare} "2-month" = February > {lunraci} "3-month" = March > {lunravo} "4-month" = April > {lunramu} "5-month" = May > {lunraxa} "6-month" = June > {lunraze} "7-month" = July > {lunrabi} "8-month" = August > {lunraso} "9-month" = September > {lunradau} "10-month" = October > {lunrafei} "11-month" = November > {lunragai} "12-month" = December > > This has the advantage over the current cmevla method in that, being > fu'ivla, we can give them place structure and use them in all the ways cmene > can NOT be used. I don't see any cons at all, but I may be mistaken. > > Since it is .xorxes. idea, I direct you to him for the proposed > definitions, although I'm certain that it will begin "x1 is month N ...." > > ----- > > In conclusion, it is my desire to inform the whole of jbogugde about these > ideas and to get feedback , and to possibly confuse you lot to start using > them whenever you are talking about days of the week or about months. > > Feedback, suggestions, criticisms, praise, and flaming are all welcome and > appreciated. :D > > (I'm double-posting this to both lojban lists, please respond on the > beginner's.) > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu > do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --001485e2eb20d0908f0491ea5ca0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I like it. =A0My only comment is, what's wrong with cmevla? =A0Why not = make them .djepav. etc... =A0Given xorxes' other proposal about merging= cmevla into brivla, this wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing (assuming= that I understand his other proposal well enough) and it wouldn't be i= nfringing on the gismu space (not that I'm all that uncomfortable with = that).

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Jonathan Jo= nes <eyeonus@gmai= l.com> wrote:
(I'm double-posting this to both lojban lists, please respond on the be= ginner's.)
-----
Days:
-----

A discussion about the nam= es of the weekdays was recently held in the thread "[lojban] la za'= ;e filjvocedra (The Age of Easy Lujvo)", about the pros and cons of th= e two current methods of naming the days of the week - one based on numbers= , the other on concepts. {pavdei} "1-day" =3D {lurdei} "moon= -day", to provide an example.

In this discussion, .xorxes. pointed out that the current number method= is anti-intuitive, because it seems as though, for example {mumdei} would = mean "five days", not "fifth day". As corollary, he poi= nted out two examples: {reljeftu}, "fortnight", and {mumymentu}, = "five minutes". To quote him, "[T]he place structure of {dje= di} screams for 'N-dei' to mean {djedi be li N}, not {djedi me'= e li N}."

Personally, I found this to be a very convincing argument against the u= se of {pavdei} et al. as names of weekdays. It is also, if I am correct, hi= s main reason for preferring the concept way.

I, on the other hand, = do not like the concept method, for the simple reason that I really, really= like having a systematic method, and that is anything but. After more disc= ussion, I came up with the following, which is agreeable to both .xorxes. a= nd me.

It's actually basically the exact same thing as {pavdei}, etc., exc= ept backwards. So, they would be:

{djeno} "0-day"/{djeze} = "7-day" =3D Sunday
{djepa} "1-day" =3D Monday
{dj= ere} "2-day" =3D Tuesday
{djeci} "3-day" =3D Wednesday
{djevo} "4-day" =3D Th= ursday
{djemu} "5-day" =3D Friday
{djexa} "6-day"= =3D Saturday

All eight of the above words have the exact same meani= ng as both current methods: "x1 is a [weekday name] of week x2 in mont= h x3"

The benefits of this method are that it is logical, systematic, and doe= sn't conflict with spans (as in {mumdei} =3D "a five day span"= ;).

The con is, obviously, they take up 8 spots in gismu space, whic= h may or may not be an atrocity, depending on your viewpoint.

-----
Months:
-----

Through further discussion, we have al= so come up with a really good method for month-naming. Currently, the only = Lojban words we have for the months are cmevla, i.e. {.pamast.}, {.remast.}= , etc. .xorxes. came up with a really good alternative, similar to my idea = with the weeks, for each of the months, which are the following fu'ivla= , based around {lunra}:

{lunrapa} "1-month" =3D January
{lunrare} "2-month&qu= ot; =3D February
{lunraci} "3-month" =3D March
{lunravo} &q= uot;4-month" =3D April
{lunramu} "5-month" =3D May
{lu= nraxa} "6-month" =3D June
{lunraze} "7-month" =3D July
{lunrabi} "8-month" = =3D August
{lunraso} "9-month" =3D September
{lunradau} &q= uot;10-month" =3D October
{lunrafei} "11-month" =3D Novem= ber
{lunragai} "12-month" =3D December

This has the advantage over the current cmevla method in that, being fu= 'ivla, we can give them place structure and use them in all the ways cm= ene can NOT be used. I don't see any cons at all, but I may be mistaken= .

Since it is .xorxes. idea, I direct you to him for the proposed definit= ions, although I'm certain that it will begin "x1 is month N ....&= quot;

-----

In conclusion, it is my desire to inform the whol= e of jbogugde about these ideas and to get feedback , and to possibly confu= se you lot to start using them whenever you are talking about days of the w= eek or about months.

Feedback, suggestions, criticisms, praise, and flaming are all welcome = and appreciated. :D

(I'm double-posting this to both lojban list= s, please respond on the beginner's.)

--
mu'o mi'e .= aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk= . mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D= )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--001485e2eb20d0908f0491ea5ca0--