Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3W6k-0003GX-RJ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:40:46 -0700 Received: by yxs7 with SMTP id 7sf5903456yxs.16 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:40:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=HpOcvwbOMRTzfsuPYZv7lSicDJ4E1KFaQyHtjWrjr2k=; b=ZAv6x1OCmGZq3ps/StwijYsYTNYWlN4JjgKpfkjVoROPzHv8EI6KqEjQpLSwtWe3Av JG8u1diq8HE6WF+SLnrmo0Ukq0sxhlZtGb7A/JtD7XKz+HZR0EOavBXiwvhfUHFnAUEX zV0NpfdDnPPuAn6XOwNMJQLY+4DxjMXWTpE4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=SZJG+s2vlO1pJYzd6Fx72nvy5fGFtLURRR/Cq9lG+Qx/Mya48iF9cWYzWYbgZPCP5x NDpfgyYu8w7AWK0SkbaKJotwBaXnBWL0vpZ+k3i8yJrrUCDcLMCYBeqhpCCAoQk7uGjF FCdw0qmLm+MSaoVGTHlgL5+1vqbB7eAxQVMfQ= Received: by 10.90.11.25 with SMTP id 25mr207433agk.49.1286379617045; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:40:17 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.125.77 with SMTP id x13ls211618ibr.1.p; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.4.14 with SMTP id 14mr3036187icq.12.1286379616327; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.4.14 with SMTP id 14mr3036186icq.12.1286379616274; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (mail-iw0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e4si624385ibc.4.2010.10.06.08.40.15; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.179; Received: by mail-iw0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 7so156555iwn.38 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:40:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.144.74 with SMTP id y10mr14166019ibu.65.1286379612951; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.48.79 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:40:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CAC9520.7070006@perpetuum-immobile.de> References: <4CA61A41.9020501@perpetuum-immobile.de> <4CAC9347.1030504@perpetuum-immobile.de> <4CAC9520.7070006@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:40:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] I love sei From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6475738e0545b0491f497ec Content-Length: 4855 --0016e6475738e0545b0491f497ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 oh... actually yeah, now that I take a second (closer) look at the original, it looks fine for the same reason that I mentioned earlier. {sei za'a do jinvi mi plana} breaks down into: I observe you opine, I am fat. It doesn't seem right because we usually don't put {sei} like constructs at the beginning of sentences in english, but it amounts to the same thing as "I'm fat, you opine ( I think )". The {do jinvi} is all that gets sucked up into the {sei} which leaves the {mi plana} as the main bridi. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Timo Paulssen < timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote: > On 10/06/2010 05:23 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: > > Actually I think Timo is right. {sei} is funny in that it will take > > as many sumti as you give it, followed by selbri and then that's it. > > It appears to me, though, that le la kampu ku protest was not about the > grammar of sei, but the semantics of the sentence. > > mu'o mi'e timos > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --0016e6475738e0545b0491f497ec Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable oh... actually yeah, now that I take a second (closer) look at the original= , it looks fine for the same reason that I mentioned earlier. =A0

<= /div>
{sei za'a do jin= vi mi plana} breaks down into:

<= span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: collapse;">I obse= rve you opine, I am fat. =A0It doesn't seem right because we usually do= n't put {sei} like constructs at the beginning of sentences in english,= but it amounts to the same thing as "I'm fat, you opine ( I think= )". =A0The {do jinvi} is all that gets sucked up into the {sei} which= leaves the {mi plana} as the main bridi.

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:26 A= M, Timo Paulssen <timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote:
On 10/06/2010 05:23 PM, Luke Bergen wrote:
> Actually I think Timo is right. =A0{sei} is funny in that it will take=
> as many sumti as you give it, followed by selbri and then that's i= t.

It appears to me, though, that le la kampu ku protest was not about t= he
grammar of sei, but the semantics of the sentence.

mu'o mi'e timos

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0016e6475738e0545b0491f497ec--