Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P1k1O-00017a-Ln; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:07:57 -0700 Received: by yxs7 with SMTP id 7sf3278841yxs.16 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:07:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Qv5ZgvBliGK5E00jW/WUF+Swy+1+1H4P3Xe0hL78Fh0=; b=qjhb5BCpBNIgDRdVhA3Re0nXaSBW8DjvBiIR3CR+j+GelIx1KZvGLVqRW9NtMRwPPl UXoVYVdA2h1cZuczZS8FmXP0Rpp+fBAdDgR66YT8RzZ2VpM6As4og6t1TVslX/FrmvwU Ttjs4RUejDe+3Brxh+pwhkYJMrHRTVXnZJzIQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=kZbep+xwfze65BT6hNSVIJipYEbp4UDS55ER9WIlSQwcFOnNnwK+W1G47yN5DKkmel MjPwz8SJgFpwnJp38cBuz4B5xvJ703lMmCP79L8MFQtIM8wIvJ3wZio0VHUlm5L6lnx/ D/xOqM5dBVNVu3MlDvLSKQZB09fVOO2vttrSk= Received: by 10.90.92.18 with SMTP id p18mr377687agb.31.1285956445142; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:07:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.125.77 with SMTP id x13ls1564182ibr.1.p; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.183.71 with SMTP id cf7mr1385728ibb.17.1285956444431; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.183.71 with SMTP id cf7mr1385727ibb.17.1285956444404; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (mail-iw0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id db12si884454ibb.5.2010.10.01.11.07.23; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.179; Received: by mail-iw0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 4so6067722iwn.10 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:07:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.190.203 with SMTP id dj11mr5928152ibb.93.1285956442701; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.48.79 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:07:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9A313EBC-E0FD-40BB-B083-F8B65E729883@switchb.org> References: <671C9B4A-4E53-4F59-8B06-22E74A4A7AC7@switchb.org> <9A313EBC-E0FD-40BB-B083-F8B65E729883@switchb.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:07:22 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] cusku/NU From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ecc6cf6be8c0491921085 Content-Length: 4985 --0016364ecc6cf6be8c0491921085 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 gah, du'u and sedu'u so are so closely related that it's hard to distinguish them. So, {se du'u} is a piece of text that expresses a {du'u} which is a fact. I've been using {cusku lo du'u} all this time when I really meant {se du'u}. {mi djuno lo du'u broda} but {mi cusku lo se du'u do broda}. On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Kevin Reid wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:58, Luke Bergen wrote: > > oops. I thought that's what {du'u} was. I thought {se du'u} was "the >> sentence that expresses a bridi". So I would think that {se du'u} is the >> actual sentence and {du'u} is the basic relationship that the {se du'u} is >> expressing. >> > > Yes, exactly so. > > 1. You said "you are fat" to me do cusku lu do plana li'u mi > 2. You said that I am fat do cusku lo se du'u mi plana > > #1 implies #2; #2 is less specific than #1, in that it does not give exact > phrasing. > > Why do you think you need to use some other abstraction than {du'u}? > > > -- > Kevin Reid > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --0016364ecc6cf6be8c0491921085 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable gah, du'u and sedu'u so are so closely related that it's hard t= o distinguish them. =A0So, {se du'u} is a piece of text that expresses = a {du'u} which is a fact. =A0I've been using {cusku lo du'u} al= l this time when I really meant {se du'u}. =A0{mi djuno lo du'u bro= da} =A0but {mi cusku lo se du'u do broda}.

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Kevin Reid <= span dir=3D"ltr"><kpreid@switchb.o= rg> wrote:

On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:58, Luke Bergen wrote:

oops. =A0I thought that's what {du'u} was. =A0I thought {se du'= u} was "the sentence that expresses a bridi". =A0So I would think= that {se du'u} is the actual sentence and {du'u} is the basic rela= tionship that the {se du'u} is expressing.

Yes, exactly so.

1. You said "you are fat" to me =A0 =A0do cusku lu do plana li= 9;u mi
2. You said that I am fat =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0do cusku lo se du'u mi pla= na

#1 implies #2; #2 is less specific than #1, in that it does not give exact = phrasing.

Why do you think you need to use some other abstraction than {du'u}?


--
Kevin Reid =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0<http://swit= chb.org/kpreid/>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0016364ecc6cf6be8c0491921085--