Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3WA8-0003LP-Kj; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:44:17 -0700 Received: by gya1 with SMTP id 1sf5913105gya.16 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:44:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=xbk09xeUVtlrDYlkayzijZ09Bep5Q09gcDutWZ/dokQ=; b=aCjaCBZsFsaQJIXT9qDVmN0YV4VUYaSY6GOAsHtXxfIBKsTFeC1Dt0oNwNUYnMlXHo u7BLl2mMg0I5vwC7A9uSpZk2f1YStb4GkPvCJUwHnfWSUMOUlqXMB5rIQcIqUv8BR0m0 OUISdz3IQ97IGRnVW0+Z+J0hB9/eUng5huQQ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=dwlLp35RIsOGzOs/AddYzRu2TUWzjic7eWF/eDgDgoAMuxjg06Ti6r01Nh/6gxeu23 yiKWiX4ybOpbIgGR78lLxBR9ct7HhipNU5N+9y5zwDnF6xZrjQqCQfvuG/RfcfRZycQw ajSSNxR1PLTFt0LkhZPwoGwL5aO8VgP671vZU= Received: by 10.91.161.20 with SMTP id n20mr65313ago.4.1286379826809; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:43:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.125.77 with SMTP id x13ls212902ibr.1.p; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.191.68 with SMTP id dl4mr3795632ibb.18.1286379825837; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.191.68 with SMTP id dl4mr3795631ibb.18.1286379825785; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f178.google.com (mail-iw0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id bm7si492149ibb.2.2010.10.06.08.43.44; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.178; Received: by mail-iw0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 35so14375954iwn.37 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:43:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.19.3 with SMTP id y3mr14119179iba.156.1286379823426; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.48.79 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:43:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CA61A41.9020501@perpetuum-immobile.de> <4CAC9347.1030504@perpetuum-immobile.de> <4CAC9520.7070006@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:43:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] I love sei From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221532cc5c6c1e8c0491f4a4fe Content-Length: 5728 --00221532cc5c6c1e8c0491f4a4fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Also, I was mis-reading who was saying what. If Timos was the one saying that "sei za'a do jinvi mi plana" is fine, then I agree with him. Otherwise I agree with kampu On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Luke Bergen wrote: > oh... actually yeah, now that I take a second (closer) look at the > original, it looks fine for the same reason that I mentioned earlier. > > {sei za'a do jinvi mi plana} breaks down into: > > I observe you opine, I am fat. It doesn't seem right because we usually > don't put {sei} like constructs at the beginning of sentences in english, > but it amounts to the same thing as "I'm fat, you opine ( I think )". The > {do jinvi} is all that gets sucked up into the {sei} which leaves the {mi > plana} as the main bridi. > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Timo Paulssen < > timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote: > >> On 10/06/2010 05:23 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: >> > Actually I think Timo is right. {sei} is funny in that it will take >> > as many sumti as you give it, followed by selbri and then that's it. >> >> It appears to me, though, that le la kampu ku protest was not about the >> grammar of sei, but the semantics of the sentence. >> >> mu'o mi'e timos >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Lojban Beginners" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --00221532cc5c6c1e8c0491f4a4fe Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also, I was mis-reading who was saying what. =A0If Timos was the one saying= that "sei za'a do ji= nvi mi plana" is fine, then I agree with him. =A0Otherwise I agree wit= h kampu

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Luke Bergen= <lukeabergen= @gmail.com> wrote:
oh... actually yeah, now that I take a second (closer) look at the original= , it looks fine for the same reason that I mentioned earlier. =A0

<= /div>
{sei za'a do jinvi mi plana} breaks down into:

I observe you opine, I am fat. =A0It doesn&= #39;t seem right because we usually don't put {sei} like constructs at = the beginning of sentences in english, but it amounts to the same thing as = "I'm fat, you opine ( I think )". =A0The {do jinvi} is all th= at gets sucked up into the {sei} which leaves the {mi plana} as the main br= idi.

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Timo Paulssen <timonato= r@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote:
On 10/06/2010 05:23 PM, Luke Bergen wrote:
> Actually I think Timo is right. =A0{sei} is funny in that it will take=
> as many sumti as you give it, followed by selbri and then that's i= t.

It appears to me, though, that le la kampu ku protest was not about t= he
grammar of sei, but the semantics of the sentence.

mu'o mi'e timos

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--00221532cc5c6c1e8c0491f4a4fe--