Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3Xm2-0003O8-Pg; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:27:30 -0700 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7sf724901ywo.16 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:27:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=UoA6K790s3be5pkUXkfOSqPDKh4F0+6pNMcRGGv14l8=; b=rC5qXWscTYSnspW9lYnnrwpU8E3jcDXZ1FW1rVHNlAhlk6ZbCSGe9AYqSXzXKOMwCq /eqDpk38SwHBk9GbrNkxmWGHhTq5a1eC9zAYu9Xh+iH4J3jvZi7y2kREwP7h9B0X2WRK f2inT0jdzPcZ/gyNM9fpnAFv0CPjRn+SKQDmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=GOin9Mo7QD/Zyyt6iGsXIOs6N7YL1b3w+3JbT7sj7te+rO5JVbE/uS3wlxvNoNhQCp TB6BZVWh55hsebJKP82uj3l3ORZPRanT0ynrXnyX3tWYtzNiTzO6N7wkqp2nYMAnuhzd enzxVMatNMC0eGxyiEYGWo9qVwmDcMWPlYLyw= Received: by 10.150.73.8 with SMTP id v8mr182699yba.43.1286386020483; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:27:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.150.53.9 with SMTP id b9ls676019yba.2.p; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.108.168 with SMTP id q28mr2988299yhg.9.1286386019826; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.108.168 with SMTP id q28mr2988298yhg.9.1286386019791; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-f51.google.com (mail-yw0-f51.google.com [209.85.213.51]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id t44si249405yhf.4.2010.10.06.10.26.58; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.51; Received: by ywi6 with SMTP id 6so1932595ywi.10 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:26:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.11.72 with SMTP id s8mr13586855ibs.110.1286386012032; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.48.79 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:26:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <84c5d2b7-de8e-4789-83f3-f5aebb028d46@g21g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <20101006154504.GC24166@alice.local> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:26:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: A suggestion for the Lojban names of weekdays and months. From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255753da4cc8f10491f615f0 Content-Length: 7770 --0003255753da4cc8f10491f615f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ok then, remove that one bullet point. I believe there are still 4 or 5 other fine points (and one subjective one). If we're going to pick an arbitrary sequence for defining week-day names, why *not* color? Are numbers more sequential than colors on a spectrum? And it avoids the confusion of "5 day time interval" as opposed to "5th day".... and it isn't a cmevla or take up gismu space. Was your suggestion mostly a joke gejyspa or was there any seriousness to it? On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Luke Bergen > wrote: > > Personally, the more I think about it, the more I'm loving gejyspa's > skadei > > suggestion. with > > "additionally" and "also" etc... I've opted for bullets> > > > > It has the sequential nature that a rational logical system should have. > > It's very flexible for different calendars to invent new day words > > without necessarily conflicting with other calendars by adding more fine > > grained color words for more days to a week or more broad color words for > > fewer days. > > Umm no. Much as I'm proud that you like my suggestion, that will NOT > work, for the same reason as the original question of xorxes > (paraphrastically "Isn't it confusing for cultures who use the different > numbering schemes?"). If we all agree that today is xundei, then what is 9 > days from now? The 7-day weekers will say "peldei, while the 9-day weekers > will say "xundei". Standards are standard for a reason. My aim was to > establish a standard that doesn't conflict with already existing cultural > standards. And really, is there much variation in week length around the > world currently? It seems that except for the 25 million Igbo's traditional > 4 day week, we aren't stepping on many currently-extant calendrical toes > here. And also (I say, tongue-in-cheekily), with the widespread > availability of colored printers, monitors and copiers, we can save room in > dates by saying, for example Oct 9, 2010 instead of "Wednesday, Oct 9, > 2010" :-) > > Really, is there anything wrong with universal standards? That's why we > have timezones, airport codes, radio frequency etc. etc. > > --gejyspa > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --0003255753da4cc8f10491f615f0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok then, remove that one bullet point. =A0I believe there are still 4 or 5 = other fine points (and one subjective one). =A0If we're going to pick a= n arbitrary sequence for defining week-day names, why not=A0color? = =A0Are numbers more sequential than colors on a spectrum? =A0And it avoids = the confusion of "5 day time interval" as opposed to "5th da= y".... and it isn't a cmevla or take up gismu space.

Was your suggestion mostly a joke gejyspa or was there any s= eriousness to it?

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at = 1:19 PM, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
=A0
=A0
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:<= /div>
> Personally, the more I think about it, the more I'm loving ge= jyspa's skadei
> suggestion. =A0<after typing out a long paragraph with sentenc= es starting with
> "additionally" and "also" etc... I've opt= ed for bullets>
>
> It has the sequential nature that a rational logical system shoul= d have.
> It's very flexible for different=A0calendars=A0to invent new = day words
> without=A0necessarily=A0conflicting with other=A0calendars by add= ing more fine
> grained color words for more days to a week or more broad color w= ords for
> fewer days. =A0
=A0
=A0Umm no. =A0Much as I'm proud that you like my suggestion,= that will NOT work, for the same reason as the original question of xorxes= (paraphrastically "Isn't it confusing for cultures who use the di= fferent numbering schemes?"). =A0If we all agree that today is xundei,= then what is 9 days from now? =A0The 7-day weekers will say "peldei, = while the 9-day weekers will say "xundei". =A0Standards are stand= ard for a reason. =A0My aim was to establish a standard that doesn't co= nflict with already existing cultural standards. =A0And really, is there mu= ch variation in week length around the world currently? =A0It seems that ex= cept for the 25 million Igbo's traditional 4 day week, we aren't st= epping on many currently-extant calendrical toes here. =A0And also (I say, = tongue-in-cheekily), with the widespread availability of colored printers, = monitors and copiers, we can save room in dates by saying, for example Oct 9, 2010 instead of &= quot;Wednesday, Oct 9, 2010" :-)
=A0
=A0 Really, is there anything wrong with universal standards?=A0 That&= #39;s why we have timezones, airport codes, radio frequency etc. etc.
=A0
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 --gejyspa
=A0
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0003255753da4cc8f10491f615f0--