On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Adam Lopresto <adamlopresto@= gmail.com> wrote:

Having given this some thought, = I think the fundamental problem is that we're using words that don'= t have the place structure we want. We're using words that represent du= rations (like {temci}) instead of coordinates/addresses (like {tcika}). So = I humbly (and with great trepedation) propose that we create two additional= gismu. =A0I'll call them {broda} and {brode}, since I don't have t= he ability to run the algorithm to assign them properly. {broda} is the day= of week gismu=20

broda: x1 is the x2th day of week number x3 of year x4, under calendar= /system x5

Similarly, brode is for days of the month (not months themselves), wit= h place structure

brode: x1 is the x2th day of month number x3 of year x3, under calenda= r/system x5

Then we can say things like "What day of the week is today?"= ({le cabdei ma broda}), or "It's October" ({brode fi li pa n= o}).

Weekdays get very natural lujvo, since {pavbroda} really *is* {broda b= e li pa}, and both represent Monday (at least, for the zu'i x5). Months= , we'd have to convert a little, though, so there might be issues there= . Or maybe the x2 place of brode doesn't belong there, and the rest nee= d to be shifted over.

I'm nearly certain that the weekday approach is right. I'd lik= e to see proper fleshing out of the months, but I think starting from here = is *much* better than trying to shoehorn things into {djedi} and {masti}.

As a side note, if you really do need to deal with cultures that use d= ifferent number schemes, you can put something unusual in x5.

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Michael Eaton <michael.eaton@blackpool.gov.uk> wrote:

Regardless of whether of not the use of gismu space is al= lowed, I don't really see any truly compelling reason why it shouldn= 9;t. The ability to accurately and clearly define a specific day of the wee= k is a not entirely inconsequential function of language, and, regardless o= f who you are, it IS a part of your everyday communication. The difference = between being able to say 'tuesday', as opposed to having to say &#= 39;the day two days after the next day', is not one to be overlooked.
As far as the existing standards for naming / numbering days go, the &#= 39;numeric' standard, as rightly pointed out, can cause some syntax iss= ues, though these are slight and not amazingly difficult to work around, wh= ile the 'conceptual' standard is rather un-lojban in approach, bein= g far less intuitive than a numbered system.

As for alternatives proposed in this very thread, would you really rath= er use, for instance, a fairly wieldy lujvo for so simple a concept as days= of the week?

I'm not saying that days of the week SHOULD take u= p gismu space, nor am I saying that they will, I'm merely pointing out = that the alternatives come with their own problems, and the use of gismu sp= ace would hardly be the travesty it is being made out to be.

-----Original Message-----
From: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com[mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com]On Behalf Of Lindar
Sent: 06 October 2010 09:30
To: Lojban Beginners
Subject: [lojban-beg= inners] Re: A suggestion for the Lojban names of
weekdays and months.

Either way, the point still stands. xorxes' proposal is likely= to
continue to be ignored. Your proposal to take up eight places in gismu
s= pace for days of the week will be shot down. Unless you can format
your = argument entirely in very understandable Lojban, you're not going
to get even one word into gismu space. It's just not going to happen.
So, you can either go with my suggestion, use the current standard, o= r
go with something like what selkik has proposed in another thread.
That's pretty much what you're down to.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to t= he Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this gro= up, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

=A0http://www.blackpool.gov.uk/EmailDisclaimer/
Th= is message has been scanned for inappropriate or malicious content as part = of the Council's e-mail and Internet policies.

=A0http://www.blackpool.gov.uk/EmailDisclaimer/
This messag= e has been scanned for inappropriate or malicious content as part of the Co= uncil's e-mail and Internet policies.

*******************************************************************= ***********See the Blackpool You Tube video aimed at attracting French visi= tors by clicking this link http://www.visitblackpool.com/jetaime *************= *****************************************************************

--=20

You received this message because you are subscribed = to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this= group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G= oogle Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, = send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.