Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P7b5q-000107-I6; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:48:43 -0700 Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6sf259542gxk.16 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:48:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=fnQMMMVdIZy9UUTLKJyPZV+AvZN2h65OVXiIlUX5uTg=; b=0q4WOgzuRHB6U2gpl4bnl3Zkb8Eh9NqgNjUKNykUe9jvuh5Ofw069FPDV01VjLP3wR KZOMi1JD7am2aQpNJ2gNphwdIhMnQQj/NvJ+cZgSEAYXBJF6Lhji6pnY45ZZ8pn2T9IQ 4BYwaZrKeA3kLmMEayh58mqUTqC5iLAmzv6S8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=Oqk1ufm2+T2+c9bn+Yo3nf4UU2uEFQ4CCwfICx6lPLHWepD6Rg7Oh0d+GeRICMynLS cRn5S4NYXBkSub6X+MDv8rUdSMZ6C2cIwfxSHNYufXAlYPMXs8IY0U7HV5tAA4nbmHGt nJHk9fJsVdEhdTNvL9WM9MXpCcdW5ryueE+lQ= Received: by 10.150.162.4 with SMTP id k4mr191849ybe.33.1287352100984; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:48:20 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.123.203 with SMTP id q11ls3442797ibr.2.p; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.161.81 with SMTP id q17mr1908059ibx.12.1287352100471; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.161.81 with SMTP id q17mr1908058ibx.12.1287352100438; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f170.google.com (mail-iw0-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b32si9210064ibq.5.2010.10.17.14.48.19; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.170; Received: by mail-iw0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 37so375043iwn.1 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:48:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.30.17 with SMTP id t17mr1873407icc.485.1287352099353; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.208.15 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:48:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <52e4a1b6-47a3-45df-b5a6-8d17188c0594@w19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <33d16e95-964e-4323-a2a7-a386033ed216@l25g2000prn.googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:48:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Abstraction terminators: kei and ku From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301d3b669532ff0492d70463 Content-Length: 2584 --20cf301d3b669532ff0492d70463 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Lindar wrote: > > The disagreement was over preferring ku over cu, which you are still > WRONG > > about. > > There is no wrong or write on the issue. It's dialectal. It's a > preference. > Let's drop the argument and agree that nobody is right, okay? > > (for the record, I'm trying to tone down the rude, so could you follow > suit?) Sorry. You hit a nerve. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --20cf301d3b669532ff0492d70463 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Lindar = <lindartheb= ard@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The disagreement was over preferring ku over cu, whi= ch you are still WRONG
> about.

There is no wrong or write on the issue. It's dialectal. It's= a
preference.
Let's drop the argument and agree that nobody is right, okay?

(for the record, I'm trying to tone down the rude, so could you follow<= br> suit?)

Sorry. You hit a nerve.

-= -
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bend= e pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the = Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--20cf301d3b669532ff0492d70463--