Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PAorL-0000vr-3M; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:07:09 -0700 Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13sf344009fxm.16 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DhTga6C8ePo2a0PWnYyubLe6AvjgLZkfD5jmNV0rHFk=; b=7BYoPOepr6KJmcYqq+lJ3udJMYK5R/CklQ7G5aJA2j2kNmzQ+Tu7nHb4ZFgVjNyoSb S4ca/lwzamyWWsfhhXN945g4R3AVjocal7O+oAlCQUG6hL+dgv4fRIN+IjDzJObCGVeZ JC5IXgB1xQoTG8pziWZVRLbYgGXqBJnyutQk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GT5dhu8fv+r2F3YKc94j6CSSumjFbz6hVcjG3woG0VofWYce9LSSxB8X1H9wJZZI2B elNaIOK7ZzjBzydwLh/4f6xRJ//x3jG66mxxDs4o3P5Rqsd8f7VzreWGpLz+A2rwPtp/ f2+836CFq265Hdx11Gw4gZo1d0JGqfcUinYNE= Received: by 10.223.106.12 with SMTP id v12mr59315fao.1.1288120000038; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:40 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.49.147 with SMTP id v19ls8764bkf.1.p; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.8.20 with SMTP id f20mr408168bkf.21.1288119998576; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.8.20 with SMTP id f20mr408167bkf.21.1288119998547; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f42.google.com (mail-fx0-f42.google.com [209.85.161.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id g12si4030709bkl.1.2010.10.26.12.06.37; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jtorndorff@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.42; Received: by mail-fx0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 10so5111043fxm.15 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.103.16 with SMTP id i16mr1254233fao.34.1288119997210; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.86.204 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:06:37 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] mi kakne lo bajra From: Jameson Orndorff To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jtorndorff@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jtorndorff@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jtorndorff@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 2282 {.i mi kakne lo bajra}, if you translate it almost literally, means "I am capable of a runner." Even if {kakne} didn't require an abstraction specifically, I still think kakne2 wants a bridi for an answer. Otherwise, that's why we have {tu'a}. On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Oren wrote: >> Can someone clarify why: >> sentence A: >> { mi kakne lo bajra } >> is not as good as >> sentence B: >> { mi kakne lo nu bajra } >> >> Assuming the rationale is that "nu" is necessary to mark an event/state,= it >> seems to me that since (event/state) is inherent in the x2 argument of >> kakne, that adding the 'nu' would be superfluous. >> Assuming the argument is that it becomes nonsensical to say sentence A, = i.e. >> "You can't say I can runner," I would think that argument is based on >> English concepts of proper grammar, and that there should be no a priori >> reason something like "I can runner" is "nonsensical." >> Or is there some other veciski? >> > > =A0Since the x2 of kakne is an event, the first sentence says you are > capable of some "running event". =A0That is, some event that runs > (whatever that maybe intended to mean), not an event OF running. =A0For > a less confusing contrast: > a)mi kakne lo drata > > b)mi kakne lo nu drata > > =A0The first says "I am capable of other things". =A0The second second > says "I am capable of being different" > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --gejyspa > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscrib= e@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an-beginners?hl=3Den. > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.