Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PB6h7-0006YJ-06; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:09:44 -0700 Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5sf1195712gyd.16 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:09:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=/FRp9DDRB7yDAo465QDIpVu4aKV+mmSIVbmU/b5t2R8=; b=m7qMBcHb4jipTk4+u4Xn7aQQM9qt4p0GFE4XtQs+90ZL3ZkeRB+A8vqU98N/cXGlUs AcQCNZrR5TDTjAQbI+hGwtRsUuKlR3tKExAlLiBYQSTBmuQi8bJAVCDXyV49YDQkgpoJ Di24Ybghq6G4UKX/tGZ3PihzSCE3g01+aLbQY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=FErQsKepIFSIIMhmxGrrggmrtYY776PD2mtYQraM7b+FOXmmcl3op1sgjecDT7IREK fyaKiQc9y6dBAJUZ8fcdqJ6vhgA7spVe+dIf/URYve8Zdw8Q3JzlPzhas2fygl/A66On GXuVh22vbVoO6x6kYLmY0RqPK3qYySN24812Q= Received: by 10.100.197.8 with SMTP id u8mr83589anf.55.1288188558638; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:09:18 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.112.41 with SMTP id u41ls675583ibp.1.p; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.239.6 with SMTP id ku6mr1104644icb.56.1288188556734; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.239.6 with SMTP id ku6mr1104642icb.56.1288188556657; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f180.google.com (mail-iw0-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id cm31si6365311ibb.7.2010.10.27.07.09.15; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.180; Received: by mail-iw0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 37so905525iwn.11 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:09:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.30.72 with SMTP id t8mr8445802ibc.46.1288188554967; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.149.14 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:09:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:09:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] mi kakne lo bajra From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022152d7fa53915eb049399c546 Content-Length: 7382 --0022152d7fa53915eb049399c546 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think part of your confusion is coming from your glosses. I think you're incorrectly inserting the "being a" in your gloss of {mi kakne lo bajra}. {mi kakne lo bajra} does not say "I am capable of [being a] runner". It's just {I am capable of doing the 'runner' event} whatever event "runner" might be. You are not "being" anything when you say {mi kakne lo bajra} On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Oren wrote: > Thanks for the replies and explanations! The lo drata / lo nu drata > comparison helps a great deal. > > But I don't yet fully comprehend "X2 IS an event or state, regardless > of what it might be. If x2 starts with "lo nu", "lo za'i", etc. then > it's essentially superfluous > (other than to clarify if it's an event or a state). But if it > doesn't such as "lo bajra", then it is an event or a state AS WELL AS > being a runner." > > ...Part of me feels like, at least when we look at the English > glosses, that the "lo drata/ lo nu drata" example has a readily > apparent semantic difference. To help me understand the generality of > this contrast, what precisely would be semantically different in the > original two cases. It seems to me that the two should be equivalent: > > Lojban: { mi kakne lo bajra } > Parse: (x1: I) am capable of (x2 [FORCE-EVENT/STATE: "being a"] runner") > Gloss: "I'm capable of a running event" > English: (I can run) > > Lojban: { mi kakne lo nu bajra } > Parse: (x1 I) am capable of (x2 [EXPLICIT-EVENT/STATE: "being a"] runner") > Gloss: "I'm capable of the event of (me?*) running" > English: (I can run) > > ki'e .i co'o mi'e korbi > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 15:43, Michael Turniansky > wrote: > > > > I also might not have been very clear what the difference of my a) > > and b) above were. So let me give it some context: > > > > a) mi bajra .i mi kakne lo drata (I am capable of a event which is > different) > > > > b) mi bajra .i mi kakne lo nu drata. (I am capable of the event of > > me being different) > > > > a) I am running. I can do something else (besides running). > > b) I am running. I can (also) be something other (than what I am, > > presumably, but not necessarily referring to runningness). > > > > --gejyspa > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --0022152d7fa53915eb049399c546 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think part of your confusion is coming from your glosses. =A0I think you&= #39;re incorrectly=A0inserting=A0the "being a" in your gloss of {= mi kakne lo bajra}. =A0{mi kakne lo bajra} does not say "I am capable = of [being a] runner". =A0It's just {I am capable of doing the '= ;runner' event} =A0whatever event "runner" might be. =A0You a= re not "being" anything when you say {mi kakne lo bajra}

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Oren <get.oren@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for the replies and explanations! The lo drata / lo nu drata
comparison helps a great deal.

But I don't yet fully comprehend "X2 IS an event or state, regardl= ess
of what it might be. =A0If x2=A0starts with "lo nu&q= uot;, "lo za'i", etc. then
it's essentially superfluous
(other than to clarify if it's an event or a state). =A0But if it
doesn't such as "lo bajra", then it is an event or a state AS= WELL AS
being a runner."

...Part of me feels like, at least when we look at the English
glosses, that the "lo drata/ lo nu drata" example has a readily apparent semantic difference. To help me understand the generality of
this contrast, what precisely would be semantically different in the
original two cases.=A0It seems to me that the two should be equivalent:

Lojban:=A0{ mi kakne lo bajra }
Parse: (x1: I) am capable of (x2 [FORCE-EVENT/STATE: "being a"] r= unner")
Gloss: "I'm capable of a running event"
English: (I can run)

Lojban:=A0{ mi kakne lo nu bajra }
Parse: (x1 I) am capable of (x2 [EXPLICIT-EVENT/STATE: "being a"]= runner")
Gloss: "I'm capable of the event of (me?*) running"
English: (I can run)

ki'e .i co'o mi'e korbi

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 15:43, Michael Turniansky <
mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> =A0I also might not have been very clear what the difference of my a)<= br> > and b) above were. =A0 So let me give it some context:
>
> a) =A0mi bajra .i mi kakne lo drata (I am capable of a event which is = different)
>
> b) =A0mi bajra .i mi kakne lo nu drata. =A0(I am capable of the event = of
> me being different)
>
> =A0a) I am running. =A0I can do something else (besides running).
> =A0b) I am running. =A0I can (also) be something other (than what I am= ,
> presumably, but not necessarily referring to runningness).
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --gejyspa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0022152d7fa53915eb049399c546--