Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PBSSu-0006xG-0u; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:29 -0700 Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13sf434058fxm.16 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:mime-version:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=x7RpvByQ9kP3JnMQPePdZPrLpzmZrLIDIDiJs2T1VSc=; b=N/Wob0toQu9nR6oMfrjIG+z19bweSuX0uohAQm/QgRQYPwTb/X7ZgXmSQwfq3JfYC7 QvVoRbObfLcmL5uWy2CJ7ELNyZXuNv4nmdiRP75bgdAe2JCoY13pzH75sdA3gwPK4sQe pdWsOmxLROytdBHoMqhbZk+x0sNhND1hNTs1M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=qVx9vvFaXUejBg/36qfVKqlKgqM0xuY3TPVxqEoMAo+LjhbFW+PRjrof57pXuTd51Q XPyXgU+wL843VNi5e1ZPoLV81oL3pptII4v3e+L2ie76oQceLlrc5kLAkJ630y/uPs8D wnqq9uO3YpEV7vc9wH9Ua+1MG8ynPoEKviV5w= Received: by 10.223.112.13 with SMTP id u13mr221388fap.42.1288272245805; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:05 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.223.32.142 with SMTP id c14ls562182fad.2.p; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.73.200 with SMTP id r8mr240317faj.20.1288272244794; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.73.200 with SMTP id r8mr240316faj.20.1288272244776; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f48.google.com (mail-fx0-f48.google.com [209.85.161.48]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 15si257310faj.15.2010.10.28.06.24.03; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of get.oren@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.48; Received: by mail-fx0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 7so2086654fxm.7 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.83.7 with SMTP id d7mr116083fal.141.1288272242981; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.114.139 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:23:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2327e11e-c10a-42d4-9e8f-bc3841fd75d9@j33g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> References: <20101027160630.GD43996@alice.local> <2b585d63-1def-4797-8c75-453e66cac098@a37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <201010280843.15900.jezuch@interia.pl> <2327e11e-c10a-42d4-9e8f-bc3841fd75d9@j33g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> From: Oren Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:23:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: mi kakne lo bajra To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: get.oren@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of get.oren@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=get.oren@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 3774 Alright, I understand now. My confusion was motivated in part by my glosses seeming indistinguishable. The demonstration that {mi kakne lo bajra } implies {lo se kakne cu bajra } cleared this up for me a great deal! However, I got a bone to pick now! As someone translating the gismu list into Chinese, I wish I had known that the (parenthetical/classifiers) before sumti were (sometimes?) prerequisites for "sensical-ness," and not just helpful guides like the [square/brackets/of/synonyms] before some sumti are. I'm specifically thinking of the linked gismu list found on jbotcan [http://jbotcan.org/gismulinked.html], where these parenthetical expressions can range from as precise and seemingly "highly recommended" as (jo'u) or (ka), to as English and seemingly only for glossing purposes as (person/object), (event/state) or even (agent). I may just be missing something. Are there in fact explicit recommended markers for *all* (parenthetical/classifiers) on the list I'm referencing? That is, it seems here that "... (event/state) x2 ..." means something like "... (use nu or za'i) x2 ..." ...do such cmavo-prescriptions exist for (event/property/interval/idea) too? And all the rest? I suspect that for things like (object/agent) we may be relying on gray-area "common sense" distinctions between groups of gismu (i.e. "Well, that makes no sense because normally tables aren't agents!"), and not anything formalized-- in which case, I think we should improve this document to make that clearer, even if it just means explicitly using cmavo for instances where cmavo are recommended, and leaving the other (gloss/classifiers) alone. Although if we all had more time, I think it would be valuable to come up with lists of sensical "object/agent/etc" tags for gismu. co'o mi'e korbi On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 05:34, Lindar wrote: >> I would not be surprised if hypothetical future native speakers of lojban would find this shortcut very convenient, though... > > Is not shortcut, is wrong. > Not think is good. > >>_> > > It's not a shortcut, it's just wrong. It means "I'm capable of a > runner." and that's always what it will mean. Nobody that -actually- > speaks Lojban would agree with your sentiments. lo bajra will always > be a runner, and lo nu bajra will always be an event of being a runner > (or "running"), and the day that it stops working like that is the day > that I give up on Lojban forever. It would introduce vast amounts of > ambiguity to have implicit abstractors, and has always been rejected. > That's called "sumti raising" and is probably worse than malgli. > > How would it be a shortcut, anyway? It's one phoneme. > > (Sorry for getting huffy. I did this when I was new as well. Just... - > don't- do it. We do things the way they're done for a very good > reason, and we've been doing it for at least a score longer than you. > Rather than suggest we change something, learn why we do it.) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > > -- Oren Robinson (315) 569-2888 102 Morrison Ave Somerville, MA 02144 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.