Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PBV5q-0006TA-46; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:12:49 -0700 Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5sf2341752qwh.16 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:12:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=16QiSKkWqIn1VrUSZmoxxJhHPt9J8tJ0lOrym7bQCVY=; b=Kh9w5Q41BoaC2azWGqtAUT7YtesAqZEecAwxfWTmvYj+w8di91azyxK1XQhxfkOahq 708wY9m6USPleTLRV8d8J9ffp8daXCwBepo0nu/CpOCMO/aBdsoOxztzSHsOB1bMb5Qm 2HJVB2tRr2w8hso3G1mB8/wE2J+82DvON9/lE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=06xetylisfehOjx6WvHp45Knhnx7cAY8iOyOBVb+OTSEmSg3SfBMfiUt0FYKBAl8gs nBTD07FT4QUC451lO0a49FXYgcnmP0v7MwAjP6M4L+TJBgHBLr08gsfEifvKXi6e9oFI WZxBZIFhkUbMTRbkuHJhbfzoBZ1UEOTMc2Cys= Received: by 10.229.142.72 with SMTP id p8mr656171qcu.23.1288282347740; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:12:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.69.77 with SMTP id y13ls889118qci.3.p; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.192.137 with SMTP id dq9mr1639502qcb.14.1288282346962; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.192.137 with SMTP id dq9mr1639501qcb.14.1288282346915; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com (mail-qw0-f45.google.com [209.85.216.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id t18si691916qcs.0.2010.10.28.09.12.25; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.45; Received: by qwf6 with SMTP id 6so2189062qwf.4 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:12:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.78 with SMTP id hx14mr2018452qcb.148.1288282345701; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.233.132 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:12:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:12:25 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] coi rodo .i preti lo pamoi sumti i. From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 4691 On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:05 AM, ranoritc wrote: > mi puza co'a mipyju'i gi'e pamoi mrilu .i preti .i > lenu na'e cusku lo pamoi sumti pe lo brivla kei frica lenu na'e cusku > lo da'a sumti kei le ka smuni xu .i > mi ca jimpe fi di'u fe lo du'u ge lenu na'e cusku lo pamoi sumti kei > se smuni lo du'u le no steci sumti cu sitna kei gi.ku'i =A0lenu na'e > cusku lo da'a sumti kei kakne se smuni lo du'u le smuvanbi sumti cu > steci sumti .i > > mupli .i lu la sam cu pendo i. gerku i. li'u glico smuni zoi gy Sam is > my friend. There is a dog. gy .i > > mi jai fenki xu .i .ao zoi gy Sam is my friend. He/She is a dog gy cu > dramau smuni i. > > ji'ape'u ko dragau le mi lojbo ku ionai .i > > mu'o mi'e ranoritc > > > > I am a long time lurker, first time poster. A question: > Is there a difference semantically between omitting the first sumti of > a brivla or omitting others? > The way I currently understand it, omitting the first sumti implies > there is no specific sumti referred to but omitting others can be > interpreted as refering to a context-implied sumti. > An example. "la sam cu pendo .i gerku: means in English "Sam is my > friend. There is a dog". > > Am I crazy? I do hope "Sam is my friend. He/She is a dog" is a more > correct interpretation. > > Also, please correct my shitty Lojban! You are not crazy, BUT... If Sam were standing right there, and you were for example petting him, it would be certainly understood that you were referring to him both times. If he were not there, you would be safer saying "la sam cu pendo je gerku" or "la sam cu pendo gi'e gerku" or "la sam cu pendo .i sy (or ri) gerku." As to your lojban: "mi puza co'a mipyju'i" Since you wanted "I'm a longtime lurker", use "mi ze'u (/ze'a) mipyju'i" That's what those interval tenses are for. "lenu na'e cusku lo pamoi sumti pe lo brivla kei frica lenu na'e cusku lo da'a sumti kei le ka smuni xu" -- you missed a "cu" (or "ku") here before "frica" . Also, use "(pa) lo drata" (or "pa bi'u") rather than "lo da'a" Because you want to ask if it's different than leavin gout one of the other sumti. What you in fact asking is if it's different than leaving out all but one of the sumti in the brivla. ".i mi ca jimpe fi di'u fe lo du'u ge lenu na'e cusku lo pamoi sumti kei se smuni lo du'u le no steci sumti cu sitna kei gi.ku'i lenu na'e cusku lo da'a sumti kei kakne se smuni lo du'u le smuvanbi sumti cu steci sumti " -- first, use "la'e di'u" rather than di'u. You are talking about the meaning of the last sentence, not the sentence itself. (But you could leave out the third argument of "jimpe" completely. We know what you are talking about). Second, once again you are missing a "cu" (or "ku") before "se smuni" (remember that "kei" closes off an abstraction (nu/ka/du'u, etc.), but leaves it as a selbri. You still need to terminate the "lo/le" in front of it which turned that selbri into a sumti.) Thirdly, rather than "sitna", which is about quoting things, you probably want "te tavla" (talked about) Fourthly, see note above about "lo da'a". Fifthly, once again, missing "cu"/"ku" before "se smuni" I'm not quite sure what you mean by " le smuvanbi sumti cu steci sumti" perhaps... "lo se claxu sumti cu smuvanbi te jimpe"?? "mupli" Not incorrect, but you can use the simpler "mu'a" "i lu la sam cu pendo i. gerku i. li'u glico smuni zoi gy Sam is my friend. There is a dog. gy " You are saying the first part is the "English meaning" of the second bit. Clearly the first part isn't English, so it's confusing at best. Suggest "i lu la sam cu pendo i. gerku i. li'u se fanva fi la gliban fu zoi gy Sam is my friend. There is a dog. gy " ".i .ao zoi gy Sam is my friend. He/She is a dog gy cu dramau smuni " You're missing the apostrophe in " .a'o " "ji'ape'u ko dragau le mi lojbo ku ionai" ".ionai" is a noise that means you are snorting derision at the phrase "le mi lojbo ku" It does not mean "shitty lojban". Suggest instead saying "maljbo"( or mabla lojbo) for "lojbo", if you want it said explicitly You don't need that "i" at the end. In fact, it's pretty much downright wrong. Curious.. how do you pronounce your name? because the lojban says "Ronorich", but the English says "Ranorith". Which is correct? --gejyspa --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.