Received: from mail-px0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PC5A9-0004bu-5h; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:43:40 -0700 Received: by pxi19 with SMTP id 19sf87916pxi.16 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:43:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=SzWy6Osj7s4EcJHfio0GgBBmCqsRDBhkl4hLTmPCwn8=; b=D1ccAnxhfavBopDFbXDuFZko10xVYqDtyrWEwuQ4QjW1Jb9V6+4SnSuzfsexsFKWRg OqZMuRq+nAHn0X5Yh4iH7J6LSgqZwwF3bXNvqY/SZ/6VIQsNhTsN+zwgz2unpB2lyZAN Hrph8wYfynT8+Jj4M9FeS4SKfvRjGuHPiW+sQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=evBK5yQ7zOAuazdSxI/1mA0Mr9F6nUD5n2OeCTQC9blNq/WkNNAaDjcVwtiMqim1pN y9rOKTwsgXVeVpHnHBMzzQNXKU+ab9xOxM02VTtulB8xAhtjCzxqXv0nO5QeG1U0Cuz7 VD7WZ5e/EdyqA46HUWHvI7tFiJVNy+l0McOfI= Received: by 10.142.65.9 with SMTP id n9mr120180wfa.14.1288420999802; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:43:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.249.41 with SMTP id w41ls2632798wfh.1.p; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.213.3 with SMTP id l3mr1651787wfg.9.1288420999006; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.213.3 with SMTP id l3mr1651785wfg.9.1288420998938; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-px0-f174.google.com (mail-px0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id p40si3579450wfc.2.2010.10.29.23.43.17; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.174; Received: by pxi15 with SMTP id 15so258470pxi.5 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:43:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.225.1 with SMTP id x1mr2164332wfg.0.1288420997770; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.71.13 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:43:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20101027160630.GD43996@alice.local> <2b585d63-1def-4797-8c75-453e66cac098@a37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <201010280843.15900.jezuch@interia.pl> <2327e11e-c10a-42d4-9e8f-bc3841fd75d9@j33g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <20101028171348.GB45294@alice.local> <73ebebef-27b3-4093-8a32-1a66115a02c0@e14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 02:43:17 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: mi kakne lo bajra From: Ian Johnson To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd32c54e4ad510493cfe397 Content-Length: 9644 --000e0cd32c54e4ad510493cfe397 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable {lo bajra} runs. Why would the basic word involved in defining running be abstract, when there is a concrete concept of running that also warrants description? Similarly, what is {lo nandu}? Not a concrete thing, an abstraction; the notion "I am difficult" doesn't make sense when taken literally, which is why we have {jai}. mu'o mi'e latros. On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Oren wrote: > @Ian and Lindar: Let me rephrase this you don't seem to hear what I'm > saying. > > "1. It's written out in the definition very plainly. > djuno - x1 knows fact(s) x2 (du'u) about subject x3 by epistemology > x4." > > I don't just mean there's an issue with how the sumti are labelled in > the gismu list. Those are trivial to modify. I mean there's no way of > knowing what gismu have those ka's and nu's built into them, and which > need them explicitly added in certain sumti positions. > > For example, take a look at nandu and bajra. > > { mi kakne lo bajra } is nonsensical > { mi kakne lo nu bajra } is sensical > > { mi kakne lo nandu } is sensical > { mi kakne lo nu nandu } (I assume) is nonsensical or overspecified. > > That is, while its true that "There are no conventional > parts-of-speech distinctions like adjectives or nouns in Lojban," > there are still undeniable semantic roles that we expect -- and reject > -- from gismu when allocated to sumti placement. > > I think it's great that we all know from the definition that { se > kakne } is an event/state (so it should have a nu), but I don't like > that there are unwritten rules for which gismu have event/state built > into them. For example, I wouldn't have anticipated the bajra/nandu > discrepancy shown above. I wish for something like: > > bajra - is a process (pu'u), is a state (za'i) > nandu - is an event (nu) > > See what I mean? > > 2010/10/29 Jorge Llamb=EDas : > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Lindar wrote= : > >> > >> You can't want an > >> apple, you can want to -eat- an apple. > > > > Fortunately nobody pays any attention to the equally silly note in the > > definition of "dunda" that you can't give an apple, you can only give > > possession of an apple, or in "vecnu" that you can't sell an apple, > > you can only sell the possession of an apple, or that you can't offer > > ("friti") an apple, and so on in several other gismu. People only seem > > to fixate on poor "djica". > > > > And eating it is not the only reason you may want an apple for. What > > you want it for is what goes in the x3 of djica, the x2 of djica is > > for what you want. > > > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou= ps > "Lojban Beginners" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > > > > > > > > -- > Oren Robinson > (315) 569-2888 > 102 Morrison Ave > Somerville, MA 02144 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. --000e0cd32c54e4ad510493cfe397 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable {lo bajra} runs. Why would the basic word involved in defining running be a= bstract, when there is a concrete concept of running that also warrants des= cription? Similarly, what is {lo nandu}? Not a concrete thing, an abstracti= on; the notion "I am difficult" doesn't make sense when taken= literally, which is why we have {jai}.

mu'o mi'e latros.

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Oren <get.oren@gmail.com> wrote:
=
@Ian and Lindar: Let me rephrase this you don't seem to hear what I'= ;m saying.

"1. It's written out in the definition very plainly.
djuno - x1 knows fact(s) x2 (du'u) about subject x3 by epistemology
x4."

I don't just mean there's an issue with how the sumti are lab= elled in
the gismu list. Those are trivial to modify. I mean there's no way of knowing what gismu have those ka's and nu's built into them, and wh= ich
need them explicitly added in certain sumti positions.

For example, take a look at nandu and bajra.

{ mi kakne lo bajra } is nonsensical
{ mi kakne lo nu bajra } is sensical

{ mi kakne lo nandu } is sensical
{ mi kakne lo nu nandu } (I assume) is nonsensical or overspecified.

That is, while its true that "There are no conventional
parts-of-speech distinctions like adjectives or nouns in Lojban,"
there are still undeniable semantic roles that we expect -- and reject
-- from gismu when allocated to sumti placement.

I think it's great that we all know from the definition that { se
kakne } is an event/state (so it should have a nu), but I don't like that there are unwritten rules for which gismu have event/state built
into them. For example, I wouldn't have anticipated the bajra/nandu
discrepancy shown above. I wish for something like:

bajra - is a process (pu'u), is a state (za'i)
nandu - is an event (nu)

See what I mean?

2010/10/29 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjl= lambias@gmail.com>:
--
Oren Robinson
(315) 569-2888
102 Morrison Ave
Somerville, MA 02144

--
You received this message because y= ou are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.<= br> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--000e0cd32c54e4ad510493cfe397--