Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PMhwy-0001PR-Oa; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:10:04 -0800 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10sf842362fxm.16 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:09:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:mime-version:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=9WOp7lVuv5fmliWAMU+lBl6pUciPw00xS+a3run42LI=; b=YEizEhmcI+cm/NSQMVaJryV+BsKjB8S2pvWSS51JaKdsLS/Bq6m3tCFv6Tkch4mYS0 EEKeJMcYz+RoXmxByIYdPzEG141lb4KgbqPbFnMtscvRZA0QFbF8GCib2+aGhIQQNQKf sMv08C4w32wkw72npharnOZokS+b3oTTKn03U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=bEelbTgzv2+Wa65A1fHaNdXQRBaiC0IhdIW8d1Eakw0m5IWIiZJtVKEoderV+uF/n7 rglYJUsSoDlzTVG4XnQZ9NcVzG0tPamH7Y38yH+y0/ReLeZOIGyPBGMMr0Hz3MWEFuB5 ZAmgGe/y6q10AuPqU+YL3pCSZhlgh7a4CqZd8= Received: by 10.223.107.195 with SMTP id c3mr157640fap.4.1290953379277; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:09:39 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.32.79 with SMTP id b15ls2129483bkd.0.p; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:09:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.8.20 with SMTP id f20mr412708bkf.9.1290953378070; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:09:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.8.20 with SMTP id f20mr412707bkf.9.1290953378020; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:09:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f48.google.com (mail-fx0-f48.google.com [209.85.161.48]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id rd15si524863bkb.1.2010.11.28.06.09.36; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:09:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of get.oren@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.48; Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so2757940fxm.35 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:09:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.79.7 with SMTP id n7mr3732299fak.33.1290953376729; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:09:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.105.207 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 06:09:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201011280019.17565.phma@phma.optus.nu> From: Oren Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:09:16 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] [fanva] "Water freezes at zero degrees Celsius, doesn't it?" To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: get.oren@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of get.oren@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=get.oren@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b393ab865710b8104961d81b5 Content-Length: 5590 --485b393ab865710b8104961d81b5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How about: L1 { lo djacu ku dunja lo jacke'o be li no vau ja'a xu } In my human language studies, i've found lots of langauges tend to do something like this: G1 Are you going? =3D> I don't know if you're going, tell me if it's true. G2 Aren't you going =3D> I thought you were going, confirm this is true. But part of me thinks its malremnybangu to assume that { xu na } should carry a connotation of prior bias to one truth value or another. That is, there should be no real difference when I ask the following: L2 { xu do klama } =3D Are you going? Yes/No L3 { xu do na klama } =3D Are you going? No/Yes (or: Are you not going? Yes/No) After all, imagining the proper intonation, both of the following English sentences could have a strong bias (they imply that the listener is confirming, not informing): G3 "You *are* going, aren't you?" or "You *are* going, right?" G4 "You aren't *going*, are you?" or "You're not *going*, right?" ...so how should I ask sentences G3 and G4 above in Lojban? mi djica lo nu djuno .au Is it { ja'a }? Is it an other-centric UI ? zo'o co'o mi'e korbi 2010/11/28 Jorge Llamb=EDas : > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: >> >> How about ".i je'u xu"? > > "je'u pei". > > Roughly (or even strictly) "xu" =3D "je'u pei". > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > > --=20 Oren Robinson (315) 569-2888 102 Morrison Ave Somerville, MA 02144 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. --485b393ab865710b8104961d81b5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
How about:
L1 { lo djacu ku dunja lo jacke'o be li = no vau ja'a xu }

In my human language studies, i've found lo= ts of langauges tend to do something like this:

G1 Are you going? = =3D> I don't know if you're going, tell me if it's true.
G2 Aren't you going =3D> I thought you were going, confirm this is t= rue.

But part of me thinks its malremnybangu to assume that { xu na = } should carry a connotation of prior bias to one truth value or another. T= hat is, there should be no real difference when I ask the following:

L2 { xu do klama } =3D Are you going? Yes/No
L3 { xu do na klama } = =3D Are you going? No/Yes (or: Are you not going? Yes/No)

After all,= imagining the proper intonation, both of the following English sentences c= ould have a strong bias (they imply that the listener is confirming, not in= forming):

G3 "You are going, aren't you?" or "Yo= u are going, right?"
G4 "You aren't g= oing, are you?" or "You're not going, r= ight?"

...so how should I ask sentences G3 and G4 above in Lojban? = mi djica lo nu djuno .au

Is it { ja'a }? Is it= an other-centric UI ? zo'o
co'o mi'e korbi

2010/11/28 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:19 AM= , Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu= > wrote:
>>
>> How about ".i je'u xu"?
>
> = "je'u pei".
>
> Roughly (or even strictly) "= xu" =3D "je'u pei".
>
> mu'o mi'e xo= rxes
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribe= d to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To post = to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@goo= glegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.goo= gle.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.
>
>



--
Oren Robinson
(315) 569-2888
102 M= orrison Ave
Somerville, MA 02144

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--485b393ab865710b8104961d81b5--