Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ5In-0007Bj-Fx; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:31:40 -0800 Received: by gwj17 with SMTP id 17sf12054212gwj.16 for ; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:31:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :received:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=QGv9f1LDUwY9QwhoV2ohqDmke+MksGL9hetVUco3J2s=; b=i71OGrRl9lW0dhE4oikbJ/K1f3hkzGKtmxcDZdxSCgboU3Z9+0baz62/zCWyhwRxcy +N6QMPZATgIzUCSVXDfUYa3wxIErdeS2WMGPPxuh3+vAtiskB4eCYywgY5vrGPTfgSL6 GlonY+ZHdxQU7XvwgMXGvUGUTkthTt83UzSx8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=DcYNICNTVxzSjUs9IdOcc1rVSd6Qr5UyxUfb++DsSNOAWu6v9I9q7WhCATODnAcyvb jxk6NFpWsVxtYl+4M8Sj7GSpGHZ04icNETy302Bep2hO6qZtK4DFL/atV3h6bjtRaSWd RyQ5Uen9sGbZv/nv269tO3KHRnBhnpNzK5rQM= Received: by 10.90.75.15 with SMTP id x15mr597123aga.42.1293903079649; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:31:19 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.76.165 with SMTP id c37ls8550900ibk.3.p; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.177.71 with SMTP id bh7mr1414132icb.92.1293903079006; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.177.71 with SMTP id bh7mr1414131icb.92.1293903078994; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:31:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com (mail-iw0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gf5si1667209icb.6.2011.01.01.09.31.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:31:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.169; Received: by mail-iw0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 40so13841840iwn.0 for ; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:31:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.15.133 with SMTP id k5mr18178233iba.187.1293903077841; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:31:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.19.199 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 09:31:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.19.199 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 09:31:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 12:31:17 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Argument repetition for emphasis? From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555f11a541b630498cc497b Content-Length: 3185 --00032555f11a541b630498cc497b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I don't think so. I would read your thing as something like "ry ju'e ry fuzme lo nu...". It says nothing about who is NOT fuzme lo nu... On Jan 1, 2011 12:20 PM, wrote: > > Coi, > > I found out rather accidentally that the following parses: {ry fuzme fa ry lo > nu...} or {ry fuzme fa vo'a lo nu...}. Would this be a good way of saying > "it's r's own fault that..." with putting emphasis on "own" as alternative to > {ba'e}? > > Feliks > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --00032555f11a541b630498cc497b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I don't think so.=A0 I would read your thing as something like "= ;ry ju'e ry fuzme lo nu...".=A0 It says nothing about who is NOT f= uzme lo nu...

On Jan 1, 2011 12:20 PM, <kfa@gmx.net<= /a>> wrote:
>
> Coi,
>
> I found out rather accidentally that the following parses: {ry fuzme f= a ry lo
> nu...} or {ry fuzme fa vo'a lo nu...}. Would this be a good way of= saying
> "it's r's own fault that..." with putting emphasis o= n "own" as alternative to
> {ba'e}?
>
> Feliks
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@goo= glegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-b= eginners?hl=3Den.
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--00032555f11a541b630498cc497b--