Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PacZV-0007Ym-NK; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:15:18 -0800 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35sf17504089wyb.16 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:15:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=fjBNL9+OyxYgK8SzlY6jXJ/OcjXYN6kB5Lr6a52spsE=; b=zfdsqI6CDSvFDNK/j8hOjpfQaWYLetETNEp4EygxdMnEqtOyWqxPO+yUw8Id3Zm0iM 7mKUUMctaBAuQgdwPIH1xWw6Spy8bHWOEaJ8/6ZRPJmYG5ySJp7QRo0zh/etgN3LK4c9 y0px3EUIZXNUVXWCJRbnTDTYnVvP9IbgewhEo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=gU8jxtcfNamvcWAjhBHmLtVCMNvCsvXkhfJUMT/eWy0SQ2sMM8wmrCYTGQ2YTc+XZe P71O6cF3u21jbAZVRqu5La/IrboaPImtJcVrObb6WPUQKkVB5E3Pdeo4LDNBPvKO2vyu kq+IJ+yUguMt570nt2V0g36YFDohiivUpB7QE= Received: by 10.216.172.73 with SMTP id s51mr3204619wel.27.1294269298843; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:14:58 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.6.216 with SMTP id a24ls4373677wba.2.p; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:14:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.143.146 with SMTP id v18mr771402wbu.15.1294269297778; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:14:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.143.146 with SMTP id v18mr771401wbu.15.1294269297763; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:14:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id y33si3666188wbd.2.2011.01.05.15.14.56; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:14:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.50; Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so15736369wwf.7 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:14:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.69.84 with SMTP id y20mr13733306wbi.86.1294269296643; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:14:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.54.72 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:14:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:14:56 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] "Not always" From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1292 On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn wrote: > {ko'a na roroi tinbe fi lo rirni be ko'a} seems to me that it doesn't carry > the implication of the original English statement that "they" sometimes, and > maybe even usually obey their parents, but there exist exceptional > occasions. Another variation is "me'i ro roi tinbe", which says how many times they do listen rather than saying it is not the case that they listen every time. (Just "me'i roi" will work too, since "me'i" takes "ro" by default.) > Would using {na'e} instead of {na} carry such an implication? "na'e ro roi" is exactly equivalent to "me'i ro roi", only because "za'u ro" is impossible, so the only way for "na'e ro roi" to be true is when "me'i ro roi" is true. "me'i" won't be the same as "na'e" for numbers other than "ro", of course, since "na'e mu roi" could be "me'i mu roi" or "za'u mu roi". mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.