Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PZQyv-00067P-6u; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:40:36 -0800 Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6sf41551703qwd.16 for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:40:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=gMwqH6ZMDDVjDDM1BpvuvpgK/vkAD2YegzFHT+4x2qY=; b=bCBtEnoG6rWrgId8uG5Fb48ofBh3C9KN49tx0ylbidOLxsYElRA3XYQl5m1oKlCbEb Qk09as/vZW5fzG+t9eSX6e/wuSYXbRxQLhTn94Vourvr62+roq4SpVnVVjNH6z+PS+YT TGEo2S1FGlCB+GstH3rVmRp++4yl9ZqtcqzzA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=tfNMpzDgA2t4kQtA8Nb7mARIic+G4+RLDPq16zen1WNlreHdAZGIC3y9nRk4v0nO0b vkmNl93Fm7RE5lEVjn1T0TUjCG2hZmW45aGu69jjibvpd7SAt4IR88WG4CohiCEb+JMq MNRCN47dSRXOVY+Oc0TX7WvAYeJ45LgpbQfD4= Received: by 10.229.67.232 with SMTP id s40mr2502981qci.49.1293986415401; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:40:15 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.80.196 with SMTP id u4ls5480003qck.0.p; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:40:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.188.67 with SMTP id cz3mr1424476qcb.14.1293986414695; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:40:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.188.67 with SMTP id cz3mr1424475qcb.14.1293986414570; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:40:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qw0-f42.google.com (mail-qw0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id j6si3612686qcu.10.2011.01.02.08.40.13; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:40:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.42; Received: by qwj8 with SMTP id 8so12986153qwj.29 for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:40:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.89.78 with SMTP id d14mr14755103qcm.251.1293986413425; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:40:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.213.204 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 08:40:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201012310927.35103.kfa@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 11:40:13 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Argument repetition for emphasis? From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1637 On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:51 AM, David Gowers (kampu) <00ai99@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Remo Dentato wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:27 AM, wrote: >>> >>> Coi, >>> >>> I found out rather accidentally that the following parses: {ry fuzme fa ry >>> lo >>> nu...} or {ry fuzme fa vo'a lo nu...}. Would this be a good way of saying >>> "it's r's own fault that..." with putting emphasis on "own" as alternative >>> to >>> {ba'e}? >>> >> >> I like the idea. The risk is that it may be confusing if abused. >> >> remo >> > > IMO it is confusing to start with. normally, an argument is a single > item -- you cannot fill a place twice.. instead you can fill it with, > for example: lo xunre .e lo blabi > > -- my understanding of the grammar is that {lo xunre .e lo blabi} is a > single sumti, > and {lo xunre ku carmi fa lo blabi} has an undefined meaning. > > In this vein, {ry .e ry fuzme lo nu..} is a way of expressing the > strange type of emphasis expressed above, in a more simple idiom. > You most certainly can fill the same place twice. See CLL, 9.3.9 Luke is correct about the meaning, and I've certainly used it myself (e.g. "mi pu klama le patfu be mi fe la flaridas.") --gejyspa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.