Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PiIeL-00041c-31; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:36:00 -0800 Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1sf814311ywh.16 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:35:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=8YhJQ9JapoKO1gIJQ+S1SpRDA7l5nS+DYhF2BBX86nc=; b=ar61hEWQLQEZ1RgzFVQnaKz0FY7XWHdj3o9/+FZxZDCjfl5oprtSJK1Ied1ZVnc6Xb j6EO8b7KSIXRSg8e7NFRlYn3dv1hzT+RthTXTUDX+Yoapxvbz03u5sG4EKxnpH20dWkA SBTGL8G7GC8UdHH3WJ0hMmoWcP2rmHqaV3UtU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=mLd063cJ93c7bje3TADi2Z34y/XrAplk1pZQGE0zYeYAUiob3pcf3mafLBm8Vop+Bf s2WpzMBtQdDzuyhlQ1AMK0al4xevUZvR0Y5Q+qAaV35gj6mIoY9d564G6z3EEiIS4Q9S 6rkneezRPcdnR4LPJuS6tp66F8zJ3HK6DNtwE= Received: by 10.236.108.179 with SMTP id q39mr11837yhg.3.1296099339566; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:35:39 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.57.97 with SMTP id b33ls1317707ibh.0.p; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:35:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.193 with SMTP id u1mr118159ibu.7.1296099338729; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:35:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.193 with SMTP id u1mr118158ibu.7.1296099338706; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:35:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f176.google.com (mail-iw0-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j25si3887429ibb.0.2011.01.26.19.35.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:35:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.176; Received: by mail-iw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 2so1780801iwn.7 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:35:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.221.199 with SMTP id id7mr1496819icb.355.1296099337614; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:35:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.172.67 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:35:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:35:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Complicated parallelism question From: Alex Rozenshteyn To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba4768259cb74d049acba484 Content-Length: 2240 --90e6ba4768259cb74d049acba484 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 A long time ago, I read that loglan exists. {.i mi pu zu tcidu cilre lo du'u la loglan zasti} And a medium time after that, that lojban does. {.i ba za bo la lojban co'e} Is there a way to use something more precise than {co'e} in the second phrase without sacrificing much conciseness? I was considering {.i ba za bo go'i lo du'u la lojban zasti}, but {pamai} I'm not sure if the {du'u} abstraction is referred to rather than the outer bridi and {remai} I still have to repeat {zasti}. {cimai} it's not very concise. -- Alex R -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --90e6ba4768259cb74d049acba484 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A long time ago, I read that loglan exists.
{.i mi pu zu tcidu cilre lo = du'u la loglan zasti}

And a medium time after that= , that lojban does.
{.i ba za bo la lojban co'e}

Is there a w= ay to use something more precise than {co'e} in the second phrase witho= ut sacrificing much conciseness?
I was considering {.i ba za bo go'i lo du'u la lojban zasti}, but {= pamai} I'm not sure if the {du'u} abstraction is referred to rather= than the outer bridi and {remai} I still have to repeat {zasti}. {cimai} i= t's not very concise.

--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--90e6ba4768259cb74d049acba484--