Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PiY7W-0002zL-R7; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:07:12 -0800 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10sf1175980fxm.16 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:07:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=1Jvef6lN1F/OKasLo9veZ9sTi8GZTApDpkKdbDvUIXc=; b=h99ExRzWnsX2s/uTjwYMvPGc733Bm+dD1anzobzqdivIfPfyxVOCG/ENH3XmZlovsI MGfu9MOf3z6pYju0u+Zygic5B2CTaZQRHMtGDg6yYYKu0LBLVRH1b7iesXNWwNV8UeFY 4xll6F4KMjzHGy7ZKpHxPOCJwSOos+SokWGlo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=V1g/cS8TgIV1ADefxUR3ufmi1MaXGSggih02iIWiVFHH1F6brIKYn9m6SloWBfiW5O z+ut18PRTZI6CFlIHqoaUab10BcvC3QyNbBlfMeMkIcxmXHpZ4VIwpZTP32hpSJ7+YwB upbq3DEUSd//uecEzfJnu9W1ajVmD+I8cHC1k= Received: by 10.223.78.129 with SMTP id l1mr125999fak.32.1296158808342; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:06:48 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.223.160.8 with SMTP id l8ls539173fax.2.p; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:06:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.110.81 with SMTP id m17mr186155fap.19.1296158807021; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:06:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.110.81 with SMTP id m17mr186153fap.19.1296158806980; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:06:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k4si1925761fax.14.2011.01.27.12.06.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lamelnyk@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.53; Received: by mail-bw0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 12so4192277bwg.40 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:06:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.51.65 with SMTP id c1mr1733460bkg.185.1296153336348; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:35:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.66.77 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:35:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5893662.473.1295996118205.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prhq39> References: <5893662.473.1295996118205.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prhq39> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:35:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] days of the week From: Oleksii Melnyk To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lamelnyk@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lamelnyk@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lamelnyk@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d34b9d2ffed6049ad83707 Content-Length: 4567 --001636d34b9d2ffed6049ad83707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2011/1/26 Lindar > Unless we have some rational alternate option, > I'll try to be rational. I feel, that the talking of the "day of week", is not rational; we are talking about the events, that taking place at that day, not the day itself. So, we'll find, that the most rational scheme for naming that is "de'i li D:J:M:N" or "de'i li N:M:J:D" modulo the choice of ":". Would we have the nice calendar, with months starting at the same day of week, we'd used "de'i li no" for that day. Good choice of ":" would allow us to address the rest of the needed places. Plain "pi'e" gives "de'ipi'epi'emy" for the month, which isn't nice. "de'i li D xi J pi'e M pi N" is a bit better, so, "de'i li pi N" refers to the year, "de'i li pi'e M" to the month. The problem is the unnatural use of "pi", that can be fixed with the reversed order: "de'i li N pi M J D". That way, we can skip the rest of the delimiters, saying MJD part fits in just 3 digits. Than we again need some shortcut for the day, for example "de'i li ji'i pa". Adopting such a system to our strange calendar is straitforward: write the day of month with radix 7, considering the least significant digit to be "day of week" if the "week" digit is missing or is vague. Now, for those of us, that want to be natlangish, we can derive the most rational scheme of day/week/month naming: "la [ de'i [ li ] ] (PA+)". with dotside, or la (PA+)(d|j|m) without. -- pe'i mi'e lex mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --001636d34b9d2ffed6049ad83707 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2011/1/26 Lindar <<= a href=3D"mailto:lindarthebard@yahoo.com">lindarthebard@yahoo.com>
Unless we have some rational alternate option,

I&= #39;ll try to be rational. I feel, that the talking of the "day of wee= k", is not rational; we are talking about the events, that taking plac= e at that day, not the day itself. So, we'll find, that the most ration= al scheme for naming that is "de'i li D:J:M:N" or "de= 9;i li N:M:J:D" modulo the choice of ":".

Would we have the nice calendar, with months starting at the same day o= f week, we'd used "de'i li no" for that day. Good choice= of ":" would allow us to address the rest of the needed places. = Plain "pi'e" gives "de'ipi'epi'emy" for= the month, which isn't nice. "de'i li D xi J pi'e M pi N&= quot; is a bit better, so, "de'i li pi N" refers to the year= , "de'i li pi'e M" to the month. The problem is the unnat= ural use of "pi", that can be fixed with the reversed order: &quo= t;de'i li N pi M J D". That way, we can skip the rest of the deli= miters, saying MJD part fits in just 3 digits. Than we again need some sho= rtcut for the day, for example "de'i li ji'i pa".

Adopting such a system to our strange calendar is straitforward: write = the day of month with radix 7, considering the least significant digit to b= e "day of week" if the "week" digit is missing or is va= gue.

Now, for those of us, that want to be natlangish, we can derive the mo= st rational scheme of day/week/month naming: "la [ de'i [ li ] ] (= PA+)". with dotside, or la (PA+)(d|j|m) without.

--
pe'= ;i mi'e lex mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--001636d34b9d2ffed6049ad83707--