Received: from mail-qy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <lojban-beginners+bncCJPv6Yn3FRDzwJvqBBoEZNI95w@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1PjwRA-0005WK-48; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:17:11 -0800
Received: by qyl38 with SMTP id 38sf12946011qyl.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:17:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:x-ip
         :references:user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=vV3iCrNDp+4GIaSiPdWbFHX87SQq5XBA0+ZV62xG6es=;
        b=C+v3g2g7Unlbhv0J5VDNbLsop/B90JAqGTt33j3yG6LF+2BN0bSAHK6WGF+LUO5Zix
         aeFfi7Ke2KboP/X7KO/iN3T/Uy+dsZVGo871Gd/jZXrSi1o4/8oH9XH8MMeoU83mUrNT
         QZRyyWHcainnf4+trISGvxyL0hxYuldUZxbR4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references
         :user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=Byfyu5cTnwHIzlgDucXVqrhdm0/IAUtmxWSQmQXRj+Zj2I06oGH2aNzmPgdjfeHwiV
         MqgybXmtiuGPskIt27zE7sQ4R9v+nEgHEhKRe5Whsbcfhg4+H7wSWODAgSrn9KrBoOhK
         CQ80M3evefjzV//zbK667tzt29fDyb4PnBDTU=
Received: by 10.224.67.138 with SMTP id r10mr340153qai.47.1296490611250;
        Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:16:51 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.196.195 with SMTP id eh3ls957670qab.1.p; Mon, 31 Jan 2011
 08:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.19.196 with SMTP id c4mr575701qab.26.1296490609674;
        Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:16:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.177.195 with SMTP id bj3mr353208vcb.44.1296487801035; Mon,
 31 Jan 2011 07:30:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by p16g2000vbo.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:29:59
 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:29:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <14164513.1846.1296353008177.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prhq39>
X-IP: 70.49.36.48
References: <14164513.1846.1296353008177.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prhq39>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
 Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <3c9493ad-d152-4874-9a8d-48bda856f92f@p16g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Complicated parallelism question
From: Hussell <jeremyhussell@gmail.com>
To: Lojban Beginners <lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-Sender: jeremyhussell@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban-beginners.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:lojban-beginners+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 1461

On Jan 29, 9:03=A0pm, Lindar <lindartheb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> While that certainly parses, I'm not exactly sure that it means what you
> want it to. I'd recommend you double-check that.

Well, I double-checked, and I still think it means what I think it
means. Could you be a little more specific about your objection,
instead of spreading FUD?

If one person is unclear about how this construct works, then it's
likely a bunch more lurkers are too, so: my understanding is {mi cilre
fi la loglan e ba bo la lojban} means the same as {mi cilre fi la
loglan i je ba bo mi cilre fi la lojban}, and in both cases lojban is
learned about *after* loglan is learned about. Another way to say the
same thing is {mi cilre fi la loglan gi'e ba bo cilre fi la lojban}.
There is no way to combine a tense and a logical connective in
forethought form, although they can be expressed separately as {mi
cilre fi ba gi la loglan gi la lojban} and {mi cilre fi ge la loglan
gi la lojban}. There's also no way to express an afterthought tense
*without* a logical connective, except between sentences.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@=
googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
-beginners?hl=3Den.