Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <lojban-beginners+bncCK7Yk5CUCxCigbLqBBoEEbjcpA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1PlULk-0004g9-AO; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:41:59 -0800
Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1sf1249354vws.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:41:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=DmfIQJ6SGfSD8/7WGmYrpvhQkKR1nZZJDO2VjJwggbM=;
        b=y0WznMsU+/wVABW57QmBTXcYnZD13ngs6wHYwTj6DKaHXrYSkb1Kz1jqAd2z4d7N7N
         q+003S4i1widtxc1wrHBJ9/NbN7qXzjN5TVjQA1L5A6TVsLDyn3ed0n9S5BMKXPt4ppj
         XxojZsj/2wmmP7iW04YUAJzBbEQHY3dxH/0so=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        b=A+BR7mIOQlTP4o/dbRo50/KnfrUjYYEaV4RMuqgDNxDfEqzoxtQLPIHG0j+9w5QEN4
         rMmHu+a358cM8fX51NzlgIb2jzzcb6jLqJ95k5D8uDCn48olK269zWhxNsJ7V25hHUB0
         LqZpm6Oa4NbLmC86kLNSdR4TCNf3pIT3MwTYo=
Received: by 10.220.74.80 with SMTP id t16mr836735vcj.38.1296859298767;
        Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:41:38 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.67.197 with SMTP id s5ls521058vci.2.p; Fri, 04 Feb 2011
 14:41:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.177.12 with SMTP id bg12mr2984261vcb.5.1296859297719;
        Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:41:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.177.12 with SMTP id bg12mr2984260vcb.5.1296859297689;
        Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:41:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10si169863vcc.11.2011.02.04.14.41.36
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.181;
Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so2395861qyk.19
        for <lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:41:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.189.6 with SMTP id dc6mr10564006qcb.175.1296859296248;
 Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.107.13 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:41:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimc+q3mbHzFJb8SeDb8TNDaXg3n0RgCVkSjOkXV@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimwjEdZA5bEeM5wmbuM97zsqgFMAhiAavJRgxo9@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikUwLHUJUkbMqDNyEHgTc6cwAr5DpZG+xLJ+jJs@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikCTtM66fwOqe=o_64qpPj6gzm7Q6bzF4K2OBjL@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimc+q3mbHzFJb8SeDb8TNDaXg3n0RgCVkSjOkXV@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:41:36 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Ff54m48dnEZS6_ZC+JH3r2-YkS7btVjbw3Kik@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Lujvo forming with cmavo rafsi
From: Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.181 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban-beginners.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:lojban-beginners+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630f8ddad3424049b7c9541
Content-Length: 3469

--00163630f8ddad3424049b7c9541
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> It seems like the writers of the CLL originally did really just think of
> lujvo as being shortened forms of tanru who have been given
> an explicit meaning instead of the vague meaning that tanru have.
>
>
While I fully agree and support that lujvo do not need to be based on tanru,
still I would suggest not to walk too much on the wild side.

I would still prefer to start with a tanru (if possible) and then move
toward more complex sentence as a base for a new lujvo.

Sure, I can make a lujvo and give it whatever meaning and place structure I
please but how good would it be?

I think you can tell that a lujvo is a good one if you are able to guess the
meaning.

{rolcatra} seems rather good to me : {ro} + {catra}  -> "all" "killer" ->
"killer of all" (omincide) -> {ko'a catra ro ko'e ko'i}

I should really do an effort to think something differnt.

remod.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.


--00163630f8ddad3424049b7c9541
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Luke Bergen <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:lukeabergen@gmail.com">lukeabergen@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrot=
e:<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D=
"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padd=
ing-left: 1ex;">
<div><font face=3D"sans-serif" size=3D"3"><br></font></div><div><font face=
=3D"sans-serif" size=3D"3">It seems like the writers of the CLL originally =
did really just think of lujvo as being shortened forms of tanru who have b=
een given an=A0explicit=A0meaning instead of the vague meaning that tanru h=
ave.</font></div>
<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">
<div><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>While I fully agree and s=
upport that lujvo do not need to be based on tanru, still I would suggest n=
ot to walk too much on the wild side.<br><br>I would still prefer to start =
with a tanru (if possible) and then move toward more complex sentence as a =
base for a new lujvo.<br>
<br>Sure, I can make a lujvo and give it whatever meaning and place structu=
re I please but how good would it be?<br><br>I think you can tell that a lu=
jvo is a good one if you are able to guess the meaning.<br><br>{rolcatra} s=
eems rather good to me : {ro} + {catra}=A0 -&gt; &quot;all&quot; &quot;kill=
er&quot; -&gt; &quot;killer of all&quot; (omincide) -&gt; {ko&#39;a catra r=
o ko&#39;e ko&#39;i}<br>
<br>I should really do an effort to think something differnt.<br><br>remod.=
<br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
Lojban Beginners" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.<br =
/>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@=
googlegroups.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
-beginners?hl=3Den.<br />



--00163630f8ddad3424049b7c9541--