Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PqRjh-0001by-4o; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:55:14 -0800 Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34sf3219729wwb.16 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:55:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MeovxnfJ2K3Jd2YzLxWaJzWPWID1AaFL8VX1Ic/8ClY=; b=t5KO0Ac22dReA2LIhulf+f+HyPKf4DXqUJ3Sru0QYjG9DgZvx1yqpI07os5+jLWlJy MusgjXF3SL0T5+xaw5NECqz9OIbsBuyHS1M9gBOwa2Tn+NakqrTg6k5NEbq0YbDWQBLT jVbOr34ugg9Tit1Oa5EfN+2y6N+zeX91F/JwE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J9GUx7RVbqp1wyo07kWdd5w8Yee/MxcqcSv/mJPNJAHDJjLqM3NAw6DTU2bc3UMYop Ae7N19FGtha3O7x7emH+dzdMlM/MkV2H3ZNfyoVXCyg+E2jSCIv5u/z/a6PnSrxImFhT lcNXmksvd8fPpzLU+/nTcQohH6ski0M7JdVdI= Received: by 10.216.188.73 with SMTP id z51mr566510wem.0.1298040891750; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:54:51 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.130.136 with SMTP id t8ls1157406wbs.1.p; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.36.12 with SMTP id v12mr123035wea.7.1298040890786; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.36.12 with SMTP id v12mr123034wea.7.1298040890769; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q45si277614weh.0.2011.02.18.06.54.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.172; Received: by mail-wy0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 23so3979385wyf.31 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:54:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.11.204 with SMTP id u12mr713428wbu.135.1298040890576; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.54.10 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:54:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201102171403.40004.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201102171622.02738.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:54:50 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Question about {roda} From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1581 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > > =A0 I respectfully disagree. Da and friends are specifically existential > variables.=A0 If they are not qualified with NOI or GOI, or some other > mechanism,=A0"ro da" MUST refer to everything, talked about or not.=A0 I = would > prefer "ro zo'e" or even "lo romei" to unqualified "ro da" if you are onl= y > talking about somethings in the universe.=A0 The purpose of "da" is to ma= ke > existential claims, and youundercut that if you use it for something else= . > (So yes, "ro prenu cu xebni mi" and not "roda xebni mi" for "everybody ha= tes > me") But when someone says "everybody hates me" they usually don't mean to include themselves, or people who have never heard of them. There's usually some implicit restriction involved in the context: "everybody relevant to what I'm saying". Not every person who has ever lived, or ever will live or ever could live, or imaginary persons, or persons that perhaps exist in another planet, or... So if you think that "ro da" is bad because it is too general, then "ro prenu" is just as bad, since a mere restriction to people is nowhere near enough. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.