Received: from mail-yi0-f61.google.com ([209.85.218.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr349-0008WG-Pa; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:46:49 -0800 Received: by yia27 with SMTP id 27sf4431682yia.16 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:46:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=wgvQyaNVn1dcqLxH8dn+i+GGor7POw4WifDQyWudpqI=; b=C3D17JW327Q4M196WapcbVzTqaAKJ/d+im0FXJbiuaZBqczEac/DiWxxwpi+oQtbRf O56yIXN2T5XHMAtW87Z9krcAgfXnzu5P3mtc3VKbbIWYi8CPaux8kvES/9SztOsumPcd gMPZr/6dCyypW5NiB+fztZnuCOpOwF4CXYPhs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=WrmjzQSp+Dcx3jVfQjrZ9hGRUfmp8QIto6bk09wgLGQaMBxzO0pSg9pZY9pb59J50J i5ri1N/EKqbHVJj7Xydq/O14yKpD4JBIx3vEyz0SlW/cQaecVdRX36+3YEo7qXDQqaEQ SgYVptl7GQvorqtD+20knRvbDrXRh1yzeMRss= Received: by 10.151.9.8 with SMTP id m8mr19918ybi.52.1298184388962; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:46:28 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.200.3 with SMTP id eu3ls3950226ibb.1.p; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.14.67 with SMTP id f3mr32341iba.15.1298184387344; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.14.67 with SMTP id f3mr32340iba.15.1298184387302; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m30si866525ibu.2.2011.02.19.22.46.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.171; Received: by iyf40 with SMTP id 40so1203606iyf.30 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.191.129 with SMTP id dm1mr79450ibb.173.1298184387120; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:46:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.199.141 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:46:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201102171403.40004.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201102171622.02738.phma@phma.optus.nu> From: Luke Bergen Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 01:46:07 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Question about {roda} To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b85a03f4ea3049cb11bea Content-Length: 9390 --0016363b85a03f4ea3049cb11bea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And if {roda} CAN be limited based on context, could one ever be certain that they were getting the message across that "yes, in this case I really am talking about EVERYTHING (in the lojbanic sense, not just material things)"? After thinking about it for a little while, it does seem like if we start letting vagueness get into {roda} it would be a hard concept to get back. If {roda} were context dependent, how would one express the {roda} that gejyspa is advocating for? {roda poi zasti}? No, not all things exist. Seems like you've got to have at least one word or phrase that literally means EVERYTHING or else how can you express EVERYTHING unless you do a bunch of crazy addition of things like {roda poi broda ja n= a broda} or something. On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > > > 2011/2/18 Jorge Llamb=EDas > >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Michael Turniansky >> >> wrote: >> > >> > roda su'ode zo'u ganai da taxfu gi de ka'e dasni da >> > (true or false, the claim "everything that is a garment must be >> potentially >> > wearable by something" is an example where roda has its intended use) >> >> Do you agree that "ro prenu cu xebni mi" is equivalent to "ro da poi >> prenu cu xebni mi"? >> >> Yes > > >> Do you agree that they are also equivalent to "ro da zo'u ganai da >> prenu gi da xebni mi"? >> > > Yes > > >> If you do, I don't see what distinction you want to make between >> universal claims that use a bindable variable and those that don't. >> The bindable variable "da" is the least important part of those >> claims, it's just used for bookkeeping, it has no content of its own. >> The content is in the predicates and the quantifier. >> > > I'm not asserting there is a distinction between universal claims using = a > bindable variable and those that don't. (Unless I'm misunderstanding you= r > question). My problem is using a universal bindable variable without > binding it, and then claiming it's something less than universal. "roda > zvati it" when no, only the people that are expected to be here are, not = the > planet Jupiter, the mayor of Rio de Janeiro, or the Great Wall of China. > > --gejyspa > > >> mu'o mi'e xorxes >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s >> "Lojban Beginners" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. --0016363b85a03f4ea3049cb11bea Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And if {roda} CAN be limited based on context, could one ever be certain th= at they were getting the message across that "yes, in this case I real= ly am talking about EVERYTHING (in the lojbanic sense, not just material th= ings)"?

After thinking about it for a little while, it does seem lik= e if we start letting vagueness get into {roda} it would be a hard concept = to get back. =A0If {roda} were context dependent, how would one express the= {roda} that gejyspa is advocating for? =A0{roda poi zasti}? =A0No, not all= things exist. =A0Seems like you've got to have at least one word or ph= rase that=A0literally=A0means EVERYTHING or else how can you express EVERYT= HING unless you do a bunch of crazy addition of things like {roda poi broda= ja na broda} or something.

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Michael Tur= niansky <mtur= niansky@gmail.com> wrote:


2011/= 2/18 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Michael Turniansky
<= br> <mturniansky@= gmail.com> wrote:
>
> =A0 roda su'ode zo'u ganai da=A0 taxfu gi de ka'e dasni da=
> (true or false, the claim "everything that is a garment must be p= otentially
> wearable by something" is an example where roda has its intended = use)

Do you agree that "ro prenu cu xebni mi&= quot; is equivalent to "ro da poi
prenu cu xebni mi"?

Yes
=A0
Do you agree that they are also equivalent to "ro da zo'u ganai da=
prenu gi da xebni mi"?

Yes
=A0
If you do, I don't see what distinction you want to make between
universal claims that use a bindable variable and those that don't.
The bindable variable "da" is the least important part of those claims, it's just used for bookkeeping, it has no content of its own. The content is in the predicates and the quantifier.
=
=A0=A0
=A0I'm not asserting there is a distinction between uni= versal claims using a bindable variable and those that don't.=A0 (Unles= s I'm misunderstanding your question).=A0 My problem is using a univers= al bindable variable without binding it, and then claiming it's somethi= ng less than universal. "roda zvati it" when no, only the people = that are expected to be here are, not the planet Jupiter, the mayor of Rio = de Janeiro, or the Great Wall of China.
=A0
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 --gejyspa


mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscr= ibed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0016363b85a03f4ea3049cb11bea--