Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PrBOR-0002jw-Rh; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:40:21 -0800 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1sf249115vws.16 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:40:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+sdBtOnA8R1eCkmhUmM+maoJKAZonLk3tDInBHYZAaM=; b=I/GBh4NkGBct13owCXQ3/WNU7f7q72NGdxyZiFySU6iBBnjJV8EhSVTu/QJRmGEeeC UMNqeDUbRSm+ReP2XBWiUoFk/EvIY34TS/sbutfRzpt1hQR9DA0NMh0ZH8ixuyjiAFOM 1Cmq9gT0k2yZ5oUrP+N3zJL5pk6qef3G0hsvM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=dk3ZB5XWB7UZKN7Bs/T4/N8QcCfF9LhEu3G+a2h2uKZwiLKe+GoM9PNuEzcShnLI/L 0ZmkokECO5hBQjZ72CGJtItgYHLORuvD0sMnlCci36d/MOaNPz2ow+eojAniKRI8XT3k nDZC4NDmGf89PLNIW3jBhLa1YHF070gjPNi2U= Received: by 10.220.190.75 with SMTP id dh11mr27345vcb.21.1298216401764; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:40:01 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.89.83 with SMTP id d19ls1099757vcm.5.p; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:40:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.161.226 with SMTP id xv2mr63971vdb.15.1298216400906; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:40:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.161.226 with SMTP id xv2mr63970vdb.15.1298216400892; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:40:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (mail-qy0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b16si761991vby.2.2011.02.20.07.40.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:40:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.171; Received: by qyj19 with SMTP id 19so1008841qyj.16 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:40:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.99.130 with SMTP id u2mr293431qcn.211.1298216399688; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:39:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.191.21 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:39:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201102200803.35938.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201102200803.35938.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:39:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Question about {roda} From: Remo Dentato To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1715 On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > "da", "de", and "di" all mean the same except that they're different > variables. If you want to be context dependent, you can say "ro zo'e". Yes, {da} {de} and {di} are the same at the moment. My suggestion was that if we really really want to make one of them having the same meaning as $\forall x$ we could use {rodi}. I can't remember reading anything with {de} in and I would bet that there's no trace of {di} anywhere in the corpus of lojban texts. Well, except when talking about {di} itself :). > I think that your "is specified by the context of the discussion" means the > same as my "universe of discourse". For example, if Matthew 14:20 said "ro da > citka gi'e tolxagjybi'o", I would understand that the people, the bread, the > fish, the boat, the sea, and maybe even John the Baptist's head all ate and > were satisfied, but not the earth's core or the star Sirius. Is that what you > meant? Yes, in that case, I would hardly understand {da} to include the bread, the boat and the sea. And certainly not the head of John the Baptist. But I would get that "everything we were talking about that could eat and could be satisfied, it was". So an unbound {da} to me, is referring to everything we were talking about and could reasonably fill the {da} place. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.