Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PsJ0S-0004dn-Js; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:00:16 -0800 Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34sf7771581wwb.16 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:00:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=19Ekd9YM86A+rYyxBHdWXTwZ9jAyyVxFw9l13Ki+mNQ=; b=jW/GWOkf9LXPTnw0YPdpNYxp3C86LAvlEeeO2H9XHfX6K7n6qi/jfvvhCj2Fypc14O EGD8Khkw54869aCXPTkRhNWUO09rmoKZXAnOmcRi3YYeKgafu2d4ArlkBucXQJT2E2Go Po7bGrNRrLtnxSvqhCiAlj6yo/mdzQ6LctN6o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=umYYYUz2VxtA+qdGQr6ZB4cJWnLIWGmnpQRTqB3Qwyt49fsHhV2TwHDT2DZRf3uC+5 64Mi4o51HsDMV4uRfKN3lvyyz/muJdnzRYvWfAYZ+ou8QTkhOMCJGvLDNHsoiPJTiM8u n+PZxUW5QTWbgaYPljruOn8gZpOHmHplfG+qg= Received: by 10.216.150.144 with SMTP id z16mr1179170wej.13.1298483993197; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:59:53 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.16.79 with SMTP id g57ls507490weg.0.p; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:59:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.157.7 with SMTP id n7mr282412wek.3.1298483991911; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:59:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.157.7 with SMTP id n7mr282411wek.3.1298483991895; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:59:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com (mail-wy0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l26si976450weq.14.2011.02.23.09.59.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:59:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.169; Received: by mail-wy0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 11so3648387wyi.0 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:59:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.151.75 with SMTP id b11mr3978443wbw.117.1298483991664; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:59:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.128.6 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:59:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201102171403.40004.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201102171622.02738.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:59:51 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Question about {roda} From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 2107 On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > But certainly, why can't "le > prenu" mean, "lo prenu poi=A0ba zvati le tersla=A0.u lo prenu poi mi djun= o lo > du'u ke'a zvati le tersla" [(those persons that will be at the party) > whether-or-not (those persons I know will be at the party)]? (You need "ku'o" in front of ".u") I'm not saying "le" can't be used that way. I only say I don't know how "le" is meant to be used. > That's the way > I'm defining le to refer to in this instance.=A0 I may not people to enum= erate > who they are, but I can still (mentally) refer to them as "whoever will b= e > at the party".=A0 That's the whole point of "le".=A0=A0It basically screa= ms > "context dependant". The usual explanation for "le broda" is that it is used to refer to certain things that the speaker has in mind (and that the speaker chooses to describe as broda), not to whatever things fit a certain description that the speaker has in mind (but that the speaker chooses to describe as broda instead). Do you agree there is a difference bewteen those two? In any case, all this stuff about "le" has nothing to do with my point, which was the comparison of "ro da" and "ro prenu". > "ro prenu" is more qualified, > and hence more restrictive than "ro da". In any domain of discourse that includes things that are not prenu, of course it is. If the domain of discourse includes only things that are prenu, it isn't more restrictive. You seem to be saying that for you there is no such thing as a domain of discourse, or alternatively, that there is one and only one domain of discourse that applies to any and all utterances. Am I understanding you correctly? mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.