Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PsRYO-0004t6-L6; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:07:52 -0800 Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20sf49246gwb.16 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:07:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :x-google-group-id:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=UvII3QxMK4or1vtlAcAj+Xq8uE+1pUfEQS1VOKPVjqE=; b=FXPmJR2nhsUWGWYKJlZ/m5JLJ4kh7C8IbGauKAboW1kV/22PU9jz1lPx6fH8l63gLP KzZvNqLaGe+PzQ3dUlvhXYVmTs3tPj9YdnRb+QkL7oQDWSxLJFUlPQ34vLIVL4SE7M4d G2es2D25MDygvjesPTz58joy2LvyTvIuoJDQQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:x-google-group-id:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=cZHspboRPWcW4dR6v2qn+Tj11BYFpBValf1FTWILC+1arVgSHdwe0UlM9f7M6X8EEQ ZxHsy3G2uP4IPHuPrkGOzVl8Qb6RhFlthVkViVP/Zz4uZDRaCXAacsDtxTXvzoymAChI UtxQnMs9l4yWvJhLnjEED5c+ycSl2R/zJwSd8= Received: by 10.151.99.19 with SMTP id b19mr126032ybm.11.1298516850646; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:07:30 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.100.28.20 with SMTP id b20ls13416anb.1.p; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.211.6 with SMTP id j6mr122598ang.25.1298516849804; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.211.6 with SMTP id j6mr122597ang.25.1298516849767; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yi0-f51.google.com (mail-yi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e31si2769985ana.11.2011.02.23.19.07.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.218.51; Received: by yib2 with SMTP id 2so63457yib.10 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:07:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.143.4 with SMTP id q4mr172404and.21.1298516849435; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:07:29 -0800 (PST) Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.93.16 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:07:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <796827.17979.qm@web130104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <796827.17979.qm@web130104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:07:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Question about {roda} From: ".arpis." To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Google-Group-Id: 94518172 Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64354488ba752049cfe83bd Content-Length: 4259 --0016e64354488ba752049cfe83bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Conversation I had with Lindar off the list, reposted at his request: Lindar: Unless I'm vastly mistaken, (ro prenu) and (ro lo prenu) are identical in meaning. Assuming this, I would like to point out that it does not talk about an inner quantifier, which means that we are speaking of all people out of an implicit number. (If you'd like to repost any of this to the list, feel free. I can't access g-groups for the next few days.) Me: http://dag.github.com/cll/16/6/ and the fourth point under "lo" on http://www.lojban.org/tiki/How+to+use+xorlo seem to state the following: {ro broda} is equivalent to {ro da poi broda} {ro lo broda} is equivalent to {ro broda} It seems (to me, who is not well versed in lojban's quantifier semantics) that {lo}'s default inner quantifier is still {ro}, and this only changes if there are no quantifiers present at all. Lindar: The CLL is wrong (doesn't include xorlo) and the xorlo article contradicts itself. In the very same section it says lo has no default quantifier. Me: I still don't quite understand it (I looked at http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+gadri), but I have convinced myself that {ro broda} refers to all of some unspecified number of {broda}. I think this means that I agree with your latest statement to the list. Lindar: Yes, that is my assertation. I wish I had access to a machine that would let me on the list. Repost this conversation for me? -- mu'o mi'e .arpis. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --0016e64354488ba752049cfe83bd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Conversation I had with Lindar off the list, reposted at his request:
Lindar:
Unless I'm vastly mistaken, (ro prenu) and (ro lo prenu) a= re identical in meaning. Assuming this, I would like to point out that it d= oes not talk about an inner quantifier, which means that we are speaking of= all people out of an implicit number.

(If you'd like to repost any of this to the list, feel free. I can&= #39;t access g-groups for the next few days.)

Me:
http://dag.github.com/cll/16/6/ and the fo= urth point under "lo" on http://www.lojban.org/tiki/How+to+use+xorlo
seem to state the following:
{ro broda} is equivalent to {ro da poi brod= a}
{ro lo broda} is equivalent to {ro broda}

It seems (to me, who= is not well versed in lojban's quantifier semantics) that {lo}'s d= efault inner quantifier is still {ro}, and this only changes if there are n= o quantifiers present at all.

Lindar:
The CLL is wrong (doesn't include xorlo) and the xorlo a= rticle contradicts itself. In the very same section it says lo has no defau= lt quantifier.

Me:
I still don't quite understand it (I looke= d at http://ww= w.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+gadri), but I have convinced myself t= hat {ro broda} refers to all of some unspecified number of {broda}.

I think this means that I agree with your latest statement to the list.=

Lindar:
Yes, that is my assertation. I wish I had access to a ma= chine that would let me on the list. Repost this conversation for me?

--
mu'o mi'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0016e64354488ba752049cfe83bd--