Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PsezQ-0003QD-Ky; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:36 -0800 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1sf474363vws.16 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :x-google-group-id:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=qQUAcGaXqDbKnFw2/h26QNbejyD47M/oyHprIqJu3bo=; b=FReJSaCyS9x37jUmybQUnVh+TnuTy2fbtfc/d3QF6ug8yWHS97BW+OA9eXcK4JvGHC SJb03slSy71UFw0p1FewRgC+/hC49u8+pPd8KiAJGJUIfuMwiaeeYcR3o4IA7p0xJxCx ME21jsTpyDdB6XDRUCC3fyEaG6RaxsFT+7j60= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:x-google-group-id:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=FGLUZwxkohkWQHCzkqiV4REhT5HreDxSevpwCgLug0o8b/fOv42EhjY3kp4RQiUrup 68StMuVmbK6eARaBnAaDxeQLojQpF7qHIe6MplcyFoUct6yDAgiE9nrTloANqg3JXzLW zK8sv7PnEEiJmvMemEP8cGPydUU63x42vq6OQ= Received: by 10.220.181.10 with SMTP id bw10mr122755vcb.57.1298568498399; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:18 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.191.10 with SMTP id dk10ls374293vcb.4.p; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.98.85 with SMTP id p21mr398985vcn.8.1298568497330; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.98.85 with SMTP id p21mr398984vcn.8.1298568497295; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com (mail-qy0-f180.google.com [209.85.216.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c37si1410779vcs.6.2011.02.24.09.28.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.180; Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so709655qyk.11 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.31.15 with SMTP id w15mr979579qcc.22.1298568496509; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.222.15 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201102241123.58373.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201102232335.57096.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201102241123.58373.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:28:16 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: BAI zi'o From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Google-Group-Id: 94518172 Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636833f8cf375b1049d0a896e Content-Length: 4531 --001636833f8cf375b1049d0a896e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 24 February 2011 10:13:11 Ian Johnson wrote: > > That seems like a pretty significant irregularity to me; if {no da} fills > a > > predicate place, it is as if {na} were put in, but if {no da} fills a TAG > > place, it isn't. Or is it that {broda TAG} is a new predicate which is > > false when {broda TAG no da} is true even though {broda} itself may be > > true? > > "noda" works the same way whether it's in a numbered place or a tagged > place. > Prepositions (including tense markers) can be negated, though, whereas FA > cannot. > > "fasnu bai noda" doesn't mean "happens without compulsion", it means > "doesn't > happen with compulsion", i.e. it may or may not happen, but if it happens, > it > is not compelled. For "happens without compulsion", I'd say "fasnu bainai". I assume the point here is that, because we are dealing with existentials, "fasnu bai noda" -> "no da zo'u fasnu bai da", there is no X such that there is an occurence forced by X. So there may or may not be an occurrence, but if there is, it's unforced? That's a shame, as it does clash with most natlangs. It seems to imply that we either have to break it out into two claims, "fasnu .ije go'i bai noda", or invert the modal, "fasnu fi'o nalbai ro da" or something. (or does that last still not work?) --gejyspa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --001636833f8cf375b1049d0a896e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Pierre Abbat <= span dir=3D"ltr"><phma@phma.optus.= nu> wrote:
On Thursday 24 February 2011 10:13:11 Ian Johnson wrote:<= br>> That seems like a pretty significant irregularity to me; if {no da}= fills a
> predicate place, it is as if {na} were put in, but if {no = da} fills a TAG
> place, it isn't. Or is it that {broda TAG} is a new predicate whic= h is
> false when {broda TAG no da} is true even though {broda} itsel= f may be
> true?

"noda" works the same way whe= ther it's in a numbered place or a tagged place.
Prepositions (including tense markers) can be negated, though, whereas FAcannot.

"fasnu bai noda" doesn= 't mean "happens without compulsion", it means "doesn= 9;t
happen with compulsion", i.e. it may or may not happen, but if it happ= ens, it
is not compelled. For "happens without compulsion", I&= #39;d say "fasnu bainai".
=A0
=A0 I assume the point here is that, because we are dealing with exist= entials, =A0"fasnu bai noda" -> "no da zo'u fasnu bai= da", there is no X such that there is an occurence forced by X.=A0 So= there may or may not be an occurrence, but if there is, it's unforced?= =A0 That's a shame, as it does clash with most natlangs.=A0 It seems to= imply that we either have to break it out into two claims, "fasnu .ij= e go'i bai noda", or=A0invert the modal, "fasnu fi'o nalb= ai ro da" or something. (or does that last still not work?)
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 --gejyspa
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--001636833f8cf375b1049d0a896e--