Received: from mail-yi0-f61.google.com ([209.85.218.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt1bG-0001dU-5g; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:37:09 -0800 Received: by yic21 with SMTP id 21sf1442400yic.16 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:37:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :x-google-group-id:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=1p0GhvPWxWvlBTQcrLIPLYI2lanhj949Op7+1pwTs14=; b=ojxW9iWwAvINs9c1lR8oNnmbMc6K0233AqTCg/pkNh2c1709klzaBk5w2mwnzL4HgO pZ6+1OcvhQNaAZ9/KlGHVIoo08PKB1wdRHUehqBFfIQ9BNFjbZo86rxnqRwoU6uF0gTY AZNiWkXBRJawiWTED3f2SF/Tcn2cXyrdUMhYA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:x-google-group-id:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=rgIrKRh7EX7if9Qq2UUD4J28Kfo9nxalLk+AauGrPdgjFjWoevUapo6/Da/l89rgLP LcgiZCs5/OX+z/bxp9utJz0lfb/TyE1SuLnLaCD3ZbspU0QdvEQL1R2CTArJDODxpSCv u1UrEiieXLmZV2kvfdttSKLT0c0z66GVq21zI= Received: by 10.90.97.11 with SMTP id u11mr353781agb.42.1298655412670; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:52 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.57.97 with SMTP id b33ls846189ibh.0.p; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.6.131 with SMTP id a3mr84228ica.79.1298655411639; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.6.131 with SMTP id a3mr84227ica.79.1298655411620; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c4si125896ict.7.2011.02.25.09.36.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.172; Received: by mail-iy0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 8so1015867iyj.3 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.13.201 with SMTP id d9mr3034533iba.124.1298655411452; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.199.141 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.199.141 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:36:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <000e0cd4c3e03fd8d2049d1e9259@google.com> References: <000e0cd4c3e03fd8d2049d1e9259@google.com> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:36:51 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: Re: [lojban-beginners] Question about {roda} From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Google-Group-Id: 94518172 Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325575fde7c3c81049d1ec69d Content-Length: 5157 --000325575fde7c3c81049d1ec69d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It just feels like option three has the power to very easily make malgli. Bob: it's wrong, it's all wrong. Dan: what's wrong? Bob: everything. This ambiguous little piece of conversation can easily be translated to lojban with option 3 roda. Bob: toldrani .i roda toldrani Dan: .i ma toldrani Bob: roda go'i Now, is the above "ambiguous" or "vague" On Feb 25, 2011 12:22 PM, wrote: > On , Michael Turniansky wrote: >> I'm sorry, but I'm with Lindar here. > Hi Michael , I know how painful is to be in agreement with Lindar, it > happens to me too, sometimes :) ({zo'o}) > >> If you want to say "I see two animals ... > I agree, I could say it differently and I probably would if I needed. The > point is how to read the sentence {roda plisa} if {da} has not been > previously bound. > > Since {roda} is grammatical, we have to decide what is the interpretation > in case {da} it's not bound. > > I see three choices: > > 1. No interpretation (ie it's nonsensical) > 2. It means EVERYTHING (in some metaphysical sense) > 3. Can be interpreted depending on the context > > My vote is in favour of option 3. The second choice for me would be option > 1. If the majority would vote for option 2 I will mumble in the dark and > never, ever use an unbound {da} > > remod > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --000325575fde7c3c81049d1ec69d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It just feels like option three has the power to very easily make malgli= .=A0
Bob:=A0 it's wrong, it's all wrong.
Dan:=A0 what's wrong?
Bob:=A0 everything.

This ambiguous little piece of conversation can easily be translated to = lojban with option 3 roda.
Bob:=A0 toldrani .i roda toldrani
Dan:=A0 .i ma toldrani
Bob:=A0 roda go'i

Now, is the above "ambiguous" or "vague"

On Feb 25, 2011 12:22 PM, <rdentato@gmail.com> wrote:
> On , Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm sorry, but I'm with Lindar here.
> Hi Michael , = I know how painful is to be in agreement with Lindar, it
> happens = to me too, sometimes :) ({zo'o})
>
>> If you want to sa= y "I see two animals ...
> I agree, I could say it differently and I probably would if I needed. = The
> point is how to read the sentence {roda plisa} if {da} has no= t been
> previously bound.
>
> Since {roda} is grammat= ical, we have to decide what is the interpretation
> in case {da} it's not bound.
>
> I see three choices:=
>
> 1. No interpretation (ie it's nonsensical)
> 2.= It means EVERYTHING (in some metaphysical sense)
> 3. Can be interpr= eted depending on the context
>
> My vote is in favour of option 3. The second choice for me wo= uld be option
> 1. If the majority would vote for option 2 I will m= umble in the dark and
> never, ever use an unbound {da}
> > remod
>
> --
> You received this message because y= ou are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.<= br>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@goo= glegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.goo= gle.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--000325575fde7c3c81049d1ec69d--