Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QDzpT-00058q-7C; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:58:30 -0700 Received: by vws2 with SMTP id 2sf701503vws.16 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:58:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=PKeuf82UFrlx4+br2RapLomGUqVvwuMP/2LFAXV7LM0=; b=gvk+U3p7eHC1dT7fjFlOe3fgfiwNRTyDDuMjFoKb/DE3cpeQS9GzK9RfbOKutrW0S7 /tHTdGQhqx1NE1B4Ld4ahTadia3L29P6uLm8BrrQKcABIXvuYFk9SVTs979puA/wE5ST nTvcAUEwf81/cs38q7KeaxGxqzZS4ubhNY5xY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=pNjlo/OgMI9ObUBdxT0jLHcEFXOshXd0q1vb+LQZGSOih+phOavJPcIdKzAA3RstlZ lrcvUkJGa6pL6UyEtHRrGpRUSyH80t32A6vqzd884/dQq+cU1HUNSs0kwlJsof2jFyBL E+MH8FW+J0hXM83KCxRp9olhdox2vlqXsV8ro= Received: by 10.220.187.69 with SMTP id cv5mr217832vcb.51.1303653497241; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:58:17 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.18.4 with SMTP id s4ls850217vdd.0.gmail; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.174.38 with SMTP id bp6mr1278061vdc.15.1303653496447; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.174.38 with SMTP id bp6mr1278060vdc.15.1303653496437; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vx0-f181.google.com ([209.85.220.181]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fl21si1275102vbb.3.2011.04.24.06.58.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.181; Received: by vxb39 with SMTP id 39so1657305vxb.40 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:58:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.72.232 with SMTP id g8mr3463999vdv.160.1303653496178; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.182.67 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:58:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7e5bdd6d-4bb8-415e-b50f-6a0d3e5454b4@e8g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:58:16 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Why is CAhA a tense/modal? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1456 On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 10:22 AM, MorphemeAddict wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_semantic_metalanguage >> >> I also don't think they're very well chosen, as a lot of them are easy to >> define without circularity. > > Really? Which ones? How would you define them? The ones I always found a bit surprizing were the pairs GOOD - BAD, BIG - SMALL, A LONG TIME - A SHORT TIME, NEAR - FAR, when one in each pair could easily be defined in terms of the other: OPPOSITE-OF GOOD, OPPOSITE-OF BIG, OPPOSITE-OF A-LONG-TIME, OPPOSITE-OF NEAR. They don't have OPPOSITE-OF as a primitive, but presumably it must be definable in terms of primitives (although it's not easy to see how). And even if you needed to use BAD, SMALL, A SHORT TIME and FAR to define OPPOSIT-OF, it would still be more economical to have OPPOSITE-OF as the primitive instead of the other four. Also, couldn't A-SHORT-TIME and A-LONG-TIME not be just SMALL FOR-SOME-TIME and BIG FOR-SOME-TIME? mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.