Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QFTMP-0008Fl-KM; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:42:37 -0700 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4sf2147614pzk.16 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:42:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ncSrWOf3EQzQi5Yoh5ihmxM5W9O6nmxd7mDbd/gboto=; b=rkStd7RUMdrIgOgaxiqdnl1+Qgor38lueM8DPOSZw5um5k+kUKDcyVV85BO2EnG9/O W7XV2UD20pj9dIqVXLrB1YVJrJhZ/17CLCCOZrGU+R39EeJduN4p4NdbS0YIHi57MLee LkGl5zY7hxLEqS91jtIB2SNQOEQ1oHS/+vrvk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; b=LEyuHkNgZd3dcGzbtKmZp+Cgs3UxA5wAESZHOiiowsvLoYT7CNEEerXOv2NhXNHPWW hmuqUu/PDdIDgTFrmOaVF5w2UWFDi4TvKKFJl6euqNNT2GPJ5zpi9RTXjbTrPONiBhtz hXLTg0aSDSk5j1L6esMqSPsj0O+3otI+4N2dw= Received: by 10.68.34.73 with SMTP id x9mr492724pbi.60.1304004956505; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:35:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.1.5 with SMTP id 5ls2466024pbi.1.gmail; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.37.102 with SMTP id x6mr356270pbj.90.1304004955988; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.37.102 with SMTP id x6mr356269pbj.90.1304004955972; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com (mail-px0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a3si922801pbd.10.2011.04.28.08.35.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.212.179 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) client-ip=209.85.212.179; Received: by pxi2 with SMTP id 2so125658pxi.10 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.43.167 with SMTP id x7mr3752318pbl.403.1304004954854; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sunflowerriver.org (173-10-243-253-Albuquerque.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.10.243.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8sm1279235pbk.95.2011.04.28.08.35.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:35:49 -0600 From: ".alyn.post." To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Possession with "le le ..." Message-ID: <20110428153549.GB30212@alice.local> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com References: <1ef02bdb-cb9a-4474-a0d8-e2fd2f84e2ab@w24g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <20110428150603.GA30212@alice.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.212.179 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) smtp.mail=alanpost@sunflowerriver.org Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 4420 Ah! ok. Thank you Luke, let me try again: The technical reason is that CU separates the preceding sumti from the selbri that follows, and a nested LE is part of the sumti.=20 If a cu were permitted in the case described, I believe this would be valid: le le broda cu brode cu brodi And would be identical to: le le broda ku brode cu brodi I suspect this is not permitted for the following reasons, though I'm speculating: * CU is designed as an aide to the listener in finding the selbri, so permitting it in a nested LE opens the possibility of having multipe CU in a bridi, weakening the ability to find the selbri. * KU is the terminator to use when terminating a nested LE. While you could *also* unambigiously permit other terminators, this isn't the only scenario where this is true. If you permitted every terminator that wasn't unambiguous you'd still have a parseable grammar, but one which would be more difficult to understand: there would be increased cognitive load in determining what is being terminated, as you no longer have a direct correspondence between the opening and closing selma'o. -Alan On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:15:34AM -0400, Luke Bergen wrote: > I think the question though is, if {cu} means "separate selbri from > preceding sumti" then, why can't you do {le le ninmu cu klama} where t= his > is interpreted as: (something that goes in x1 of: ( something that goe= s in > x1 of: (ninmu selbri>) comes). > Ok, I don't know how to describe that better. Basically, if {cu} says = "ok, > we're done with this sumti, now do a selbri" but that itself is happen= ing > inside a LE, then why can't the following selbri be converted by the o= uter > LE? >=20 > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:06 AM, .alyn.post. > <[1]alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote: >=20 > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:49:21AM -0700, Ben Foppa wrote: > > Lojban for Beginners says "...consider how you would say le tamne = pe > > le ninmu klama 'the woman traveller's cousin' with this kind of > > nesting. You could flip it around as le le ninmu klama tamne =EF= =BF=BD but > > then, how can you tell where the 'possessor' ends and where the > > 'possessee' begins?" > > > > I wonder why a construct like "le le ninmu klama cu tamne" wouldn'= t > > work, to separate the argument to the first "le" (which is "ninmu > > klama"), from the argument to the second "le" (which is "tamne"). = Is > > the purpose of "cu" not simply to separate two selbri when they ar= e > > consecutive arguments, or when one is the argument to another? > > >=20 > You can use {ku} to terminate the inner {le}: >=20 > le le ninmu klama ku tamne >=20 > -alyn > -- > .i ma'a lo bradi ku penmi gi'e du > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to > [2]lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [3]lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > [4]http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. >=20 > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com= . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. >=20 > References >=20 > Visible links > 1. mailto:alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org > 2. mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com > 3. mailto:lojban-beginners%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com > 4. http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den --=20 .i ma'a lo bradi ku penmi gi'e du --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.