Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QI0BK-0005yG-98; Thu, 05 May 2011 08:09:37 -0700 Received: by vxk20 with SMTP id 20sf2006013vxk.16 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 08:09:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=eKUQL0CyivsnTBtGYQtXdsM31bKgJPKqOCc6o1rHc8I=; b=RM5Zw9dfQ8S7brpr57WaucYlHEa4IQkCSilqNmU8KcqCkUKd9GTVniecyoQmkJsLgN nqes0vlc3p5pMe+pB1egsAdyC5lNQaPIdiQ63hXDpEj2kr+SoUPr/AXYNhsuTbsAwrYv D3zQEYmj4JxJmgbpMaKnMdYCm1fIVJ1nT7sDE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=AAJG71PKoh7+s8Bs0ExqUHeQIQ5sE/RDuSWhIQ/dW42fgwt9pIRa67hw7aS/k/LD1t IO2OEdIZPLQZF8KlrEcHbW13EZII19k+nYnbUGw9oJqMgafmNDNnIRmMb3jyoDh5K7B3 xJu2oHUyJRdS66pLFv7KnTkPSUCSTz3A5azF0= Received: by 10.220.4.130 with SMTP id 2mr315665vcr.44.1304608164334; Thu, 05 May 2011 08:09:24 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.177.98 with SMTP id cp2ls776802vdc.0.gmail; Thu, 05 May 2011 08:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.96.161 with SMTP id dt1mr523116vdb.8.1304608163602; Thu, 05 May 2011 08:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.96.161 with SMTP id dt1mr523115vdb.8.1304608163583; Thu, 05 May 2011 08:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vx0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ez14si529177vbb.5.2011.05.05.08.09.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 May 2011 08:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.170; Received: by mail-vx0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 40so3254418vxb.15 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 08:09:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.71 with SMTP id ig7mr3195371vdb.209.1304608163377; Thu, 05 May 2011 08:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.185.167 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2011 08:09:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3ddd6de1-671f-41fa-90a5-102799cc26f7@x38g2000pri.googlegroups.com> References: <3ddd6de1-671f-41fa-90a5-102799cc26f7@x38g2000pri.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 12:09:23 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: ci lo gerku vs lo ci gerku From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1758 On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:41 AM, ranoritc wrote: > ionai la xorlo na'e ciste fi lo selklani po zo lo i ni'i la'edi'u lu > lo gerku cu blabi li'u selsmuni lu lo no gerku cu blabi li'u xu i si'a > selsmuni lu lo piso'a gerku cu blabi li'u xu i si'a selsmuni lu lo > mo'a gerku cu blabi li'u zo'o i selbebna .i > > Ranorith > > Yuck, I really hate how xorlo specifies that lo "has no default > quantifiers". Does that mean if I say "lo gerku cu blabi" this is a > fine generalisation of "lo no gerku cu blabi"? What about "lo piso'a > gerku cu blabi"? Or perhaps "lo mo'a gerku cu blabi"? So silly. Indeed that's silly, but I don' t follow your reasoning. I say that "lo" has nothing to do with quantifiers, and you ask whether "lo" can have some more or less absurd hidden quantifiers? Just forget about any connection between "lo" and quantifiers. Is "lo gerku cu blabi" a fine generalization of "lo zirpu gerku cu blabi" because "lo" has no default color? Is "lo gerku" a fine generalization of "lo fetsi gerku" because "lo" has no hidden gender? What about "lo fetsi najenai nakni gerku"? Or does "lo" have a default "fetsi ja nakni" gender? "lo" has nothing to do with color, it has nothing to do with gender, and it has nothing to do with number. That doesn't mean you can assume there are hidden crazy colors, genders or numbers when you use "lo". mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.