Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <lojban-beginners+bncCI7tjcWhDhCsqpDuBBoEm0r7jA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1QIN3m-0005ex-OU; Fri, 06 May 2011 08:35:21 -0700
Received: by pwi1 with SMTP id 1sf2706877pwi.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 06 May 2011 08:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:x-ip
         :references:user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=kRaItk3lvfdvobzP4Da9szWStFKWgCIZs9e77SxIqXk=;
        b=kLAsSNnWgIv0i7VlF8VTYhSlTKXKr8P8wyiaH759QGB/LLXj6vVHAfcnWRWxR8jOYy
         uVs/8Q8zPBJarowNNScT24QRnJofuqubuXK6DxXBb9vqfpJAjFmOhYz12rp2A3bmVNS7
         NPwjIeEMyP94DZIMDHi/SWPk60AEapTmsFUBs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references
         :user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=xbVh4TOyMIqc4jx1I5uQ70QMwSiPMQddkOmv3fmHvclnA86PmBwfz5OkcG7cCWWz9x
         rqaG3ZPUEH8seDkcBZm8KtOoohZzeUERVzWU3QNh++/jyuoO7GLCTJAT1JG6lcd77dKJ
         FuHVJo4/yqKCHlLRorqBU9MAQKLnJjLwurvnM=
Received: by 10.142.121.42 with SMTP id t42mr369506wfc.15.1304696108944;
        Fri, 06 May 2011 08:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.142.218.15 with SMTP id q15ls2290770wfg.0.gmail; Fri, 06 May
 2011 08:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.194.3 with SMTP id r3mr369451wff.17.1304696107761; Fri, 06
 May 2011 08:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by l2g2000prg.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2011 08:35:07
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 08:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=veHnxUmDHGkXe2PEse0C+OYDP4Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-IP: 120.151.96.168
References: <d02197b3-ec11-4945-8fdf-7f94b9907c9c@u26g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <BANLkTimeONUEVTTvH0Piu6sNaWqWStJ=Ng@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinyBYLKmWQjU+HJgjAaeCFrhQCAHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTikP=tB=yv5sAaFR6YSkuju_pfhxug@mail.gmail.com> <3ddd6de1-671f-41fa-90a5-102799cc26f7@x38g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
 <BANLkTi=veHnxUmDHGkXe2PEse0C+OYDP4Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13)
 Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <025af042-f0be-48ff-b7de-79434433d587@l2g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: ci lo gerku vs lo ci gerku
From: ranoritc <ranorith@gmail.com>
To: Lojban Beginners <lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-Sender: ranorith@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban-beginners.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:lojban-beginners+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 3131

"Is "lo gerku cu blabi" a
fine generalization of "lo zirpu gerku cu blabi" because "lo" has no
default color? Is "lo gerku" a fine generalization of "lo fetsi gerku"
because "lo" has no  hidden gender? What about "lo fetsi najenai nakni
gerku"?"

Yes, yes, yes. If I say "the purple dog is white" is true then
necessarily the sentence "the dog is white" is true (for some dog).
Similarly in lojban, if "lo zirpu gerku cu blabi" then "lo gerku cu
blabi". seltaa modify tertau but don't change them completely - lo
broda brode cu brode. However, quantifiers can. If "lo no gerku cu
batci mi" this in no way implies "lo gerku cu batci mi". In fact, they
are contradictory. In the three examples I gave above, the first "lo
no gerku cu blabi" was meant to show how a quantifier could contradict
the generalisation, the second to show how a quantifier could be
independent from (not imply or be implied by) the generalisation, and
the third was a bit of a joke, so feel free to ignore that.

Suffice to say, quantifiers are not seltau, they act differently to
seltau, and that should in my opinion be part of the written law of
lojban, not just "oh but we know from context when someone says 'lo
gerku' they mean 'lo su'o gerku' but maybe they don't"

On May 6, 1:09=A0am, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllamb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:41 AM, ranoritc <ranor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ionai la xorlo na'e ciste fi lo selklani po zo lo i ni'i la'edi'u lu
> > lo gerku cu blabi li'u selsmuni lu lo no gerku cu blabi li'u xu i si'a
> > selsmuni lu lo piso'a gerku cu blabi li'u xu i si'a selsmuni lu lo
> > mo'a gerku cu blabi li'u zo'o i selbebna .i
>
> > Ranorith
>
> > Yuck, I really hate how xorlo specifies that lo "has no default
> > quantifiers". Does that mean if I say "lo gerku cu blabi" this is a
> > fine generalisation of "lo no gerku cu blabi"? What about "lo piso'a
> > gerku cu blabi"? Or perhaps "lo mo'a gerku cu blabi"? So silly.
>
> Indeed that's silly, but I don' t follow your reasoning. I say that
> "lo" has nothing to do with quantifiers, and you ask whether "lo" can
> have some more or less absurd hidden quantifiers? Just forget about
> any connection between "lo" and quantifiers. Is "lo gerku cu blabi" a
> fine generalization of "lo zirpu gerku cu blabi" because "lo" has no
> default color? Is "lo gerku" a fine generalization of "lo fetsi gerku"
> because "lo" has no =A0hidden gender? What about "lo fetsi najenai nakni
> gerku"? Or does "lo" have a default "fetsi ja nakni" gender? "lo" has
> nothing to do with color, it has nothing to do with gender, and it has
> nothing to do with number. That doesn't mean you can assume there are
> hidden crazy colors, genders or numbers when you use "lo".
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@=
googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
-beginners?hl=3Den.