Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QR6yR-0007pE-M5; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:14:00 -0700 Received: by fxm14 with SMTP id 14sf7081113fxm.16 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:13:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=yzpebSMd3lSkahbvT40KJogjw5LrFaOB31xWyMAkEI4=; b=hwaxgBAnuaJBcsdqQhxqipD5wA3VsMBqB5OIGI2AtnYt7xFn7SZC5IobmcsOu9u1U2 1b29FcPlxmOJHiuJXpRRNFJmwoCeUIoM8rQBOaK0IESpj4VEVkRWumDoNPfK+JWdQyis 2Qea2xwc3iEbJoBRpF5keeVJZyzZhH35Xv7tA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=ZAlbEDE8EIAlJ4lsuMi5D8mGiqIrGgnpHvhjmri0EV6eio2QDHu7QIsfjdHZI23O5z YidW51Zxj5z16iL3zbDvicZvsEd5PoMEGNkr29eGnkYqSKAYUI2SabEsDwRDLoX+P4uA 3cAJhCPXGKxjS/Yepb9hRlRft0v5Fj/oUHx5o= Received: by 10.223.73.134 with SMTP id q6mr644536faj.41.1306779225887; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:13:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.34.76 with SMTP id k12ls1982196bkd.0.gmail; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.172.130 with SMTP id l2mr583876bkz.23.1306779224646; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.172.130 with SMTP id l2mr583875bkz.23.1306779224616; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f52.google.com (mail-bw0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y18si2852103bkf.2.2011.05.30.11.13.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 May 2011 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.52; Received: by mail-bw0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 24so4596036bwj.11 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.126.214 with SMTP id d22mr3498078bks.21.1306779224401; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.166.130 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 14:13:44 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Who created the universe? no da, zi'o, etc. From: ".arpis." To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dbe86e78663204a4823fa1 Content-Length: 10296 --0016e6dbe86e78663204a4823fa1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As I understand it a asserts that the world was not, in fact created; i.e. it asserts that {lo munje cu na se cupra da} b is a very non-informative answer, saying something like {lo te cupra be l= o munje cu zasti .iju lo cupra be lo munje cu zasti} (there was a processes b= y which the world was created, but there may or may not have been a creator) c would not be an answer (since "na'i" is not a sumti), and IIRC, {na'i go'i} might be more acceptable, but it would indicate that it doesn't even make sense to talk about the creation of the world, or that something outside the bridi is wrong. I'm not sure about the backcounting rules, but {ri} seems like an acceptabl= e response (but not the one I'd use) and {vo'a} seems weird. I'd say {lo go'i= } if I meant to respond with the world created itself. Also, I think for f, you mean {ri noi cevni}, unless you mean {ri poi cevni fi ke'a} rather than {ri poi ke'a cevni}, and even so, it's confusing. Usin= g {poi}, you're restricting your claim to only worlds the fit in some place (probably the first) of {cevni}, while using {noi} you're providing additional information that the world is god (or, less likely, that the world is god's domain, since you didn't specify with {ke'a}). I'm sorry if I didn't fully address your question or if I've confused you further (or if I'm just dead wrong; I'm still learning too). Please feel free to follow-up with more questions. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:46 PM, paul_faehrbrorn wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I have been reading about Lojban for quite while now, more or less > read through the CLL, and started playing around with the language. > So, I do have a grasp of moderately simple sentences (with a very > restricted vocabulary, that is), but I often find myself bumping my > mind either on Lojban grammar or on the underlying logic in general. > Which is probably why Lojban is such a nice thing. :) > > I have now succeeded in confusing myself most utterly with the > following (made-up) Lojban question and answers: > > lo munje cu se cupra ma > > a) no da > b) zi'o > c) na'i > d) vo'a > e) ri > f) ri poi cevni [feeling a little bit panentheistic here ...?] > > Now, my questions are partly about the meaning (in this context) of > the cmavo involved, and partly about syntactical correctness: > > If the premise be that the world as such has not been produced/built/ > created by any entity (so, more or less the common sense assumption > that the world just there, and that's about it ...)---could anybody > please help me understand the difference in meaning between answers a) > and b), and b) and c)? > > I think that a) is about an empty set of world-creators. But could we, > then, still say that the world is "se cupra"? Probably yes, since, if > not, would a) not *entail c)? > > b) looks like a normal "fill-in-the-sumti" answer to a "ma"-question, > but does in fact turn the bridi "se cupra" into the different bridi > "se cupra zi'o", doesn't it? Is that grammatically, pragmatically > possible? What does it mean? > > And c) seems to claim that it is not meaningful to say of the world > that it is created by somebody---does that mean that "lo munje cu se > cupra no da" isn't meaningful, either? > > And, finally, if I were to claim that the world created itself > (whatever that may mean), would answers d) to f) be grammatically > correct, and would they refer to "lo munje", as intended? > > (If something like this has already been discussed, could you point me > to it? I didn't find it then, sorry.) > > Thanks > Paul F=E4hrbrorn > > PS: I'm learning Lojban through English, but I'm not a native English > speaker. Please be forbearing with regard to quirky English. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > > --=20 mu'o mi'e .arpis. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. --0016e6dbe86e78663204a4823fa1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As I understand it

a asserts that the world was not, in fact created= ; i.e. it asserts that {lo munje cu na se cupra da}
b is a very non-info= rmative answer, saying something like {lo te cupra be lo munje cu zasti .ij= u lo cupra be lo munje cu zasti} (there was a processes by which the world = was created, but there may or may not have been a creator)
c would not be an answer (since "na'i" is not a sumti), and I= IRC, {na'i go'i} might be more acceptable, but it would indicate th= at it doesn't even make sense to talk about the creation of the world, = or that something outside the bridi is wrong.

I'm not sure about the backcounting rules, but {ri} seems like an a= cceptable response (but not the one I'd use) and {vo'a} seems weird= . I'd say {lo go'i} if I meant to respond with the world created it= self.

Also, I think for f, you mean {ri noi cevni}, unless you mean {ri poi c= evni fi ke'a} rather than {ri poi ke'a cevni}, and even so, it'= s confusing. Using {poi}, you're restricting your claim to only worlds = the fit in some place (probably the first) of {cevni}, while using {noi} yo= u're providing additional information that the world is god (or, less l= ikely, that the world is god's domain, since you didn't specify wit= h {ke'a}).

I'm sorry if I didn't fully address your question or if I'v= e confused you further (or if I'm just dead wrong; I'm still learni= ng too). Please feel free to follow-up with more questions.

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:46 PM, paul_faehrbrorn <pa.fae@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi everybody,

I have been reading about Lojban for quite while now, more or less
read through the CLL, and started playing around with the language.
So, I do have a grasp of moderately simple sentences (with a very
restricted vocabulary, that is), but I often find myself bumping my
mind either on Lojban grammar or on the underlying logic in general.
Which is probably why Lojban is such a nice thing. :)

I have now succeeded in confusing myself most utterly with the
following (made-up) Lojban question and answers:

=A0lo munje cu se cupra ma

a) no da
b) zi'o
c) na'i
d) vo'a
e) ri
f) ri poi cevni [feeling a little bit panentheistic here ...?]

Now, my questions are partly about the meaning (in this context) of
the cmavo involved, and partly about syntactical correctness:

If the premise be that the world as such has not been produced/built/
created by any entity (so, more or less the common sense assumption
that the world just there, and that's about it ...)---could anybody
please help me understand the difference in meaning between answers a)
and b), and b) and c)?

I think that a) is about an empty set of world-creators. But could we,
then, still say that the world is "se cupra"? Probably yes, since= , if
not, would a) not *entail c)?

b) looks like a normal "fill-in-the-sumti" answer to a "ma&q= uot;-question,
but does in fact turn the bridi "se cupra" into the different bri= di
"se cupra zi'o", doesn't it? Is that grammatically, pragm= atically
possible? What does it mean?

And c) seems to claim that it is not meaningful to say of the world
that it is created by somebody---does that mean that "lo munje cu se cupra no da" isn't meaningful, either?

And, finally, if I were to claim that the world created itself
(whatever that may mean), would answers d) to f) be grammatically
correct, and would they refer to "lo munje", as intended?

(If something like this has already been discussed, could you point me
to it? I didn't find it then, sorry.)

Thanks
Paul F=E4hrbrorn

PS: I'm learning Lojban through English, but I'm not a native Engli= sh
speaker. Please be forbearing with regard to quirky English.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi'= e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--0016e6dbe86e78663204a4823fa1--