Received: from mail-pv0-f189.google.com ([74.125.83.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QcU20-0004cE-V2; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:04:38 -0700 Received: by pvc22 with SMTP id 22sf2102541pvc.16 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:04:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dbxHywCNTigsjYTkvfT3GfN/1w9MyMrjc0dAp2Dv6yo=; b=Mq4a9y7VqpFfTWe82/6U9AumHYQ/Lcez7RN5yYECsTaCXd5GGi3z4/O25PA2xhSLVs YkqdCcgpX4yGpIRa18aoMvzva5ieGiVr03pQYTExa/JBHQkpxyLzkKuGCK7/mtt1Sv6m edExhOthkQ8+qwPycXAyqYYk8UMudjXMi+leA= Received: by 10.142.125.15 with SMTP id x15mr537692wfc.15.1309489468730; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:04:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.16.199 with SMTP id i7ls1424631pbd.3.gmail; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.34.33 with SMTP id w1mr585312pbi.83.1309489467821; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.34.33 with SMTP id w1mr585311pbi.83.1309489467804; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v9si5841770pbc.2.2011.06.30.20.04.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.54; Received: by mail-pz0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 27so3790457pzk.27 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:04:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.5.168 with SMTP id t8mr3284049pbt.342.1309489467405; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.40.9 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:04:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1665dd93-53b2-4442-8b6d-ab80aabdcbda@b21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <9454fde3-7042-4c60-82d9-776f51b07b5c@t38g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <8ecaf8d7-810f-41e7-b4cc-9208b696f6ce@g16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:04:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: {le} and {lo} From: Ian Johnson To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec521582b8ab5b104a6f946a5 Content-Length: 5117 --bcaec521582b8ab5b104a6f946a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This makes sense, true. However, it's consequently stronger than simply having it in mind in a sense: you also describe it as being such, whether or not it actually is such. mu'o mi'e .latros. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Stela Selckiku wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Ian Johnson > wrote: > > Erm...{le broda} is not {zo'e noi ke'a broda}. It's {zo'e noi mi skicu > ke'a > > do lo ka ce'u broda}. Technically the formal definition has nothing to do > > with "having in mind", which sorta confuses me still. Is there some > > historical undercurrent here that I don't know about? > > I'm not sure if that definition has been formally accepted, but it > does make sense to me, and it does say that you have to have the > referent in mind. To "skicu" something is to hold it in mind while > attempting to describe it to an audience. Each time you "skicu" it, > you think of some attribute it has, and then convey that attribute to > the audience: "It's red" or "it's thiiiiiiiiis big". It doesn't make > sense to "skicu" unless you have a particular referent in mind, > something you can think about and consider various properties of. > > mi'e la stela selckiku mu'o > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --bcaec521582b8ab5b104a6f946a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This makes sense, true. However, it's consequently stronger than simply= having it in mind in a sense: you also describe it as being such, whether = or not it actually is such.

mu'o mi'e .latros.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote: > Erm...{le broda} is not {zo'e noi ke'a broda}. It's {zo= 9;e noi mi skicu ke'a
> do lo ka ce'u broda}. Technically the formal definition has nothin= g to do
> with "having in mind", which sorta confuses me still. Is the= re some
> historical undercurrent here that I don't know about?

I'm not sure if that definition has been formally accepted, but i= t
does make sense to me, and it does say that you have to have the
referent in mind. =A0To "skicu" something is to hold it in mind w= hile
attempting to describe it to an audience. =A0Each time you "skicu"= ; it,
you think of some attribute it has, and then convey that attribute to
the audience: "It's red" or "it's thiiiiiiiiis big&q= uot;. =A0It doesn't make
sense to "skicu" unless you have a particular referent in mind, something you can think about and consider various properties of.

mi'e la stela selckiku mu'o

--
You received this message because y= ou are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.<= br> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--bcaec521582b8ab5b104a6f946a5--