Received: from mail-qy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QRn0j-0007Dy-CK; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:07:10 -0700 Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36sf9336072qyk.16 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:06:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=k/y+061bb1nfGuTM/M5pEpNXwNx8gisR9r93wjrlgGU=; b=sf9RC9Qr7dsSCDIH/bHH/GEVOU5O0fsLVjMdZ+W8+J5xR4/pFRnwwwidWciHiFLHxH 5Ng/lFrRFc59Ru1Tzcf5KAXYnQQUKmuLzDla30ow1wrl9+RA9nBrJftXPZHMPlZAxIsE fyBpM5L3TkC6yUAUDQ/Wq5G1wJVwiZMOP8wQg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=CGvofUN/wjRXc9QjZWtw5RBV5DCOtVi2V907xTC0hkRWX2WH8ykKKZhkAGsYfvTeHk V1jOhP0b3wtFeQ0bwasbaUso6uoS/8oAY7AyWDybHfXj7wOLnvPRs7zvIwISX+v7v4Ds DZw46AjTSBM307Rx4O1ubo797gFdW6rt/p3cY= Received: by 10.224.207.3 with SMTP id fw3mr1819796qab.55.1306940816498; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:06:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.187.145 with SMTP id cw17ls118360qab.2.gmail; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:06:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.197.194 with SMTP id el2mr1864334qab.14.1306940815976; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hv8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:06:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110422 Linux Mint/10 (Julia) Firefox/3.6.17,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <3c1eb5ce-6d28-4d42-b72f-e20b536f4598@hv8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Who created the universe? no da, zi'o, etc. From: paul_faehrbrorn To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: pa.fae@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 2213 Thank you (both) for your answers. On May 30, 8:33 pm, Michael Turniansky wrote: > > b) looks like a normal "fill-in-the-sumti" answer to a "ma"-question, > > but does in fact turn the bridi "se cupra" into the different bridi > > "se cupra zi'o", doesn't it? Is that grammatically, pragmatically > > possible? What does it mean? > > It would mean a thing that is created but without a creating agent. > It's hard to imagine, which is why zi'o isn't often used ;-) So, "ti botpi fo ma" --- "i zi'o" is a correct, if unlikely, dialogue involving a speaker who is inclined to mistake a lidless bottle for a lo botpi? > No, although a) does imply c) (but not vice versa). There is > something wrong on a meta-level about you asking what created the > world. That something being my contrafactual presupposition of a world creator/lo se cupra? On May 30, 8:13 pm, ".arpis." wrote: > b is a very non-informative answer, saying something like {lo te cupra be lo > munje cu zasti .iju lo cupra be lo munje cu zasti} (there was a processes by > which the world was created, but there may or may not have been a creator) Because generally "zi'o broda" does not necessarily entail "na broda"? > Also, I think for f, you mean {ri noi cevni}, unless you mean {ri poi cevni > fi ke'a} rather than {ri poi ke'a cevni}, and even so, it's confusing. Using > {poi}, you're restricting your claim to only worlds the fit in some place > (probably the first) of {cevni}, while using {noi} you're providing > additional information that the world is god (or, less likely, that the > world is god's domain, since you didn't specify with {ke'a}). Yes, I meant the additional information that everything which is world is god (but not necessarily the other way round). So, I think "noi" is what I want. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.