Received: from mail-qw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qceca-0000OE-NS; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:23:07 -0700 Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5sf3525832qwh.16 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:22:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=hN4Jv9ganmLRO6J5iG2GjifdJVvGAfFsj30Xq2Hwo6I=; b=YPM8T8MZdEd0/OqS0cpyL2mQNp3hCW/8W5YfEXWxDfCdMHcDnVaDQSxsWhN+c0FYef i3ni6bwH00BTt9JdG/KiCjOHYA6RmJxIGfQO0jGzyDu/py4+wA3iK3cu8IZAFrSYZYFn pSDIwqN1b7lTHhHBlQEdaMlWdXD6NZFNw2cZM= Received: by 10.224.208.68 with SMTP id gb4mr388476qab.6.1309530176154; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:22:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.181.131 with SMTP id by3ls815970qab.3.gmail; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.217.133 with SMTP id hm5mr522988qab.0.1309530175577; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.184.14 with SMTP id ci14msqab; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 05:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.178.103 with SMTP id cx7mr1282276vdc.10.1309524248725; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.178.103 with SMTP id cx7mr1282275vdc.10.1309524248714; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com (mail-qy0-f176.google.com [209.85.216.176]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ch6si2675676vdb.2.2011.07.01.05.44.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.176; Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so2293315qyk.0 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:44:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.6.196 with SMTP id a4mr2491258qca.143.1309524248244; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 05:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.228.70 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 05:44:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <10004ed4-220c-4c41-8fb9-57de30a45bb3@16g2000yqy.googlegroups.com> References: <1665dd93-53b2-4442-8b6d-ab80aabdcbda@b21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <9454fde3-7042-4c60-82d9-776f51b07b5c@t38g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <8ecaf8d7-810f-41e7-b4cc-9208b696f6ce@g16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <10004ed4-220c-4c41-8fb9-57de30a45bb3@16g2000yqy.googlegroups.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:44:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: {le} and {lo} From: tijlan To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: paskios@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paskios@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1611 On 30 June 2011 14:32, Ben Foppa wrote: > Would I then be correct in saying that {le} implies that, in my mind, > the dog I'm referencing has a separate identity than the "standard" > dog? Yes. But that isn't the only thing {le} implies, and that isn't something which can be implied by only {le}. A sumti described as {gerku} might have another identity in addition to {lo gerku} regardless of whether or not its gadri is {le}. If there is {lo gerku poi pendo mi}, the described object has at least two separate identities: a dog & a friend. As to "standard": A non-standard dog may still be considered a dog. The world's ugliest dog is {lo gerku}, however abnormal its appearance may be. And we may refer to it by {le gerku} too, by way of emphasizing the particular-ness of the creature as an instance of {lo gerku}. You could say it has a separate identity from standard dogs, but both parties share the same generic identity as {lo gerku} nevertheless. By extension, {le gerku} could arguably be used to refer to standard dogs as well, by way of presenting them as distinct instances of {lo gerku}, in that they are *standard* and not non-standard dogs (for which {lo'e} is more conventional). mu'o mi'e tijlan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.