Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QuFIk-00015S-5f; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:59:20 -0700 Received: by vxh2 with SMTP id 2sf3280047vxh.16 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:59:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9epZL6Z4rG1H1yYGezIpkNypGKJRzQYLNI+iuqTaZRk=; b=fTfRgefN2DhcWanrDWQ4gOfuDnXvZrnN5qr4df8/SzgwgW4acllTgCYjzmzMjwThwV 751KcQM/PAbSb8q9Z9q/5GGpI8efrGhg0g1L+W827gQ5vVrzSptT3Mr9hQs73bZbysU/ mdO0lygI2F8lXjCS4cA6ymwH0nwKm/SK7fhbg= Received: by 10.220.37.202 with SMTP id y10mr447082vcd.50.1313722749176; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:59:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.210.3 with SMTP id gi3ls5776860vcb.5.gmail; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:59:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.159.5 with SMTP id h5mr445250vcx.44.1313722748279; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fv14g2000vbb.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:59:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201108182249.48390.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201108182249.48390.phma@phma.optus.nu> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <727abbdc-83b6-443d-93b0-d358f4dc4120@fv14g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Question about appropriateness of articles From: Jed To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: three65daysaweek@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of three65daysaweek@yahoo.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=three65daysaweek@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1471 Why is "lo ponskina" okay? Just because it ends in a full-length gismu? On Aug 18, 9:49=A0pm, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 18 August 2011 22:36:37 Jed wrote: > > > Is it okay to use "lo," "le," and their derivative forms as articles > > for: > > > 1. Words created from roots, e.g. "ponkin" (anime) > > 2. Words whose context is apparent from the truncated gismu at their > > beginnings, e.g. "cidjrdonat." (doughnut) > > > Or do I just have to use "la" and its derivative forms? I believe I've > > seen it written both ways, although I've never learned about these > > types of proper nouns in depth, and I don't know whether it's really > > correct to do so. > > Those words are cmevla, so you have to use "la", > e.g. "la .ponkin.". "lo .ponkin." is ungrammatical. You can make a selbri= by > preceding it with "me": "tu me la .kobus. la .kob." (a kind of African > bovid). This is called a type-2 fu'ivla. You can also, of course, say "lo > ponskina". > > Pierre > > -- > La sal en el mar es m=E1s que en la sangre. > Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.