Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QxIQP-0005zC-M7; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 05:56:05 -0700 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3sf223008gxk.16 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 05:55:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q6xDKqm38L7abZ8Y5Lkn3JQE4TGrZ2TyF70WHRaC2fo=; b=TcjxRFlqVEvFIAnsFb0RYyvEKUevi8QvqoOSdTz+TfZT8pHO7IqPEM27foG6mSVpv3 aRp+r4Gn9Swrh5cxPjQl1Kd4JJsd9JtkdKUi/wT/hBQnfPHXhylvmxFYoTYkWYPJET+f 8Xfd2pL6nJIL25IqeIrgAgMRI9IP6R4r8jw8o= Received: by 10.101.154.5 with SMTP id g5mr430134ano.26.1314449739892; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 05:55:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.204.19 with SMTP id g19ls7494474anq.5.gmail; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 05:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.176.15 with SMTP id d15mr2075528anp.1.1314449739208; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 05:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.109.2 with SMTP id h2msybc; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 04:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.174.209 with SMTP id bu17mr2058763vdc.16.1314445186238; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 04:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.174.209 with SMTP id bu17mr2058762vdc.16.1314445186229; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 04:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f43.google.com (mail-qw0-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m27si4946465qcz.2.2011.08.27.04.39.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 27 Aug 2011 04:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.43; Received: by qwf6 with SMTP id 6so3075587qwf.2 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 04:39:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.209.21 with SMTP id ge21mr3001780qcb.177.1314445186039; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 04:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.73.203 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 04:39:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <41f3563c-23b4-4c7b-96fc-8b5fcd11033a@z1g2000prf.googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:39:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Lojban "r" From: tijlan To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: paskios@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paskios@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 4027 On 26 August 2011 18:09, Jonathan Jones wrote: > My point is that the "er" in "better" is pronounced comparably to the "er= " in "lerfu". Many British, Australians, etc. don't pronounce the "r" in "better" or "hard" as the phoneme /r/. I myself as a non-native has adopted that non-rhotic accent. For us, "better" is /b=C9=9Bt.=C9=99/, "hard" is /h=C9= =91=CB=90d/. On 26 August 2011 18:29, Jonathan Jones wrote: > The Lojban sound-cluster that sounds like the English "air" is {eir}, not= {er}. "air" /=C9=9B=C9=99/ (UK) /=C9=9B=C9=B9/ (US) http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/air#English That would be Lojbanized as {ey} or {er}. > .ebu is pronounced as the "e" in "b_e_tt_e_r", ""w_e_t", "p_e_st", etc. I know no modern native English accent in which the second "e" in "better" is pronounced like the first one, like the Lojban /e/. On 26 August 2011 21:37, Jonathan Jones wrote: > All Lojban vowels are always pronounced the same way they are in the Roma= nce > languages (French, Spanish, Italian, Latin....), or, I recently learned, = the > same way they are pronounced in Japanese (which is the same as the Romanc= e > languages). Doesn't have to be Romance. Among the Europeans, the Germanic (German, Swedish...), the Slavic (Russian, Polish...), and the Uralic (Finnish, Hungarian...), too, have pure vowels that Lojban and not English has. The Japanese /u/ is unrounded, [=C9=AF], and there is no [=C9=AF] in those Romance languages above, nor in Lojban. In terms of the amount of vowels, Japanese is pretty much the same as Spanish but hardly French or Italian. (If we could add [=C9=AF] to the Lojban /u/, thus allowing the vowel to be pronounced with different roundedness, we could by the same logic also have rounded /i/ and /e/ as in French, Swedish, Finnish, etc.) On 27 August 2011 02:50, Jonathan Jones wrote: > Then I would have a problem distinguishing which is being said outside of > context, as unless {cirlrfu} and {cirlerfu} have different emphasis, they > sound the same to me- at least when I say them. For people with certain first languages such as Japanese and Koreans, the problem would be the difference between not so much "lr" and "ler" as "l" and "r". I come across cases where they confuse these consonants in writing or speech and in English (e.g. "grand" vs "gland") or Esperanto (e.g. "granda" vs "glanda") or Lojban (e.g. "karli" vs "kalri"). (Hence the term "Engrish".) For them, "-rlr-" is bound to be extremely challenging. (And many Polynesian languages have no consonant cluster at all.) Fortunately or unfortunately, Lojban allows a nonce buffer vowel between consonant clusters, so they might be helped by pronunciations like "-r[@]l[@]r[@]-" where "@" would represent any vowel other than the prescribed six, but that would also for some other people make more difficult telling "ler" from "l[@]r". On 27 August 2011 05:48, Jonathan Jones wrote: > I don't like the trilling. It sounds wrong as an ending sound, and it mak= es > it much harder to hear the important bit - the difference between your "e= " > and your "ei". From my subjective viewpoint, [er] [e=C9=BE] [e=CA=81] are easier to hear t= han [e=C9=B9]. [=C9=B9] sounds to me the most vowel-ish among them and tends to blend into the surrounding vowel rather than cutting it out. If I wanted to make a clearer distinction between "e" and "ei" in speech by /r/, I would use [r] or [=CA=81]. > In any case, your "r" is my "er", and your "er" and "eir" are my "eir". "relererelerfu" becomes "ereleireireleirfu"? mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.