Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:41224) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNoW7-0002R3-68; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:20 -0800 Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14sf350950vcb.16 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=9CfhOoSpOA8ZGpojdRVvAN7V4RaulAFvUbjRxMM1NTw=; b=hIv1Ol4WwhQ7frcXt+BoY4jDGQv5nf0zyo3TIOCPLnqr8pUlfmQWwrpB3kChiKbety /qUlsWeHPXfwmv7e4Ufm4j2bQw+dWLeH2DMWX1o54v6o7Iqq0v6933ELvQG+Ll6GyADq 2Fq8xqBPB3yYzRetS7W/fLEXSUOHclsm7DUbk= Received: by 10.52.17.148 with SMTP id o20mr1720330vdd.4.1320769626017; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:06 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.206.2 with SMTP id i2ls14256509anq.1.gmail; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.131.12 with SMTP id i12mr4461870ann.28.1320769624305; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.131.12 with SMTP id i12mr4461869ann.28.1320769624283; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gy0-f180.google.com (mail-gy0-f180.google.com [209.85.160.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f3si2692695ybi.0.2011.11.08.08.27.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.180; Received: by mail-gy0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 20so1049683gyh.39 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.185.198 with SMTP id u46mr43195404yhm.113.1320769624078; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.103.5 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:26:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <13153413.1507.1320768880666.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqan20> References: <28766495.1817.1310280099392.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqyy3> <246b16f2-c892-4fd0-b329-96271b271bf1@k8g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <201108030750.25490.phma@phma.optus.nu> <22345005.2719.1312465668458.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqic12> <04CADBF1-A01D-48D3-A682-C812F3E946B9@switchb.org> <13153413.1507.1320768880666.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqan20> From: Luke Bergen Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:26:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: "mi prami do" or "mi cu prami do" ? To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3056409f45f86d04b13ba4fa X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 8459 --20cf3056409f45f86d04b13ba4fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't think it's actually saying "mine". From what I understand {lo mi gerku} is equivalent to {lo gerku pe mi}. {pe} *can* imply ownership when context would give that impression, but really it only means association. e.g. {lo mi mamta} =3D {lo mamta pe mi} =3D "the mother associated with me"= . I don't own her. She is just associated with me. but {lo mi re'azda} =3D {lo re'azda pe mi} =3D "my house". That last "=3D"= isn't true strictly, it's just inferred from context. It could also be "that house I sold (because I'm a realtor talking to a co-worker)", etc... As for your original question. The difference is that {me mi} is saying "one of those things that are mi". So technically (IMO): lo mi gerku cu xamgu =3D the dog that is associated with me is good lo me mi gerku cu xamgu =3D the dog that is associated with one of the thin= gs that is "me" is good. (though really "one of" is too strict since we're using {lo}) On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:14 AM, najrut wrote: > This makes things even more strange. > Now tell me what is the difference between > "lo mi gerku cu xamgu" and "lo me mi gerku cu xamgu" ? > The first one is translated as > "lo any/some mi gerku dog(s) [of] I, me)2 cu is/does =AB3xamgu being > good=BB3]1" > and the second one as > "lo any/some (3me amongst those that are mi I, me [type-of] gerku > dog(s))3)2 cu is/does =AB4xamgu being good=BB4]1" > > Yes, "lo mi gerku" meaning "my dog" is quite handy, but why it breaks the > logic of anything learnt before ? > mi gerku means "I'm a dog" and when it is used as a sumti in the phrase > > it must mean <"I'm a dog" is good> whatever that means. > > "me mi gerku" (my dog) has much more sense as it clear resembles "prenu > gerku" (person's dog). > > I feel that the "rule" of transforming "I am" into "mine" when adding "lo= " > is absolutely alien to other lojbanic rules. > > On Thursday, August 4, 2011 6:10:49 PM UTC+4, Kevin Reid wrote: > On Aug 4, 2011, at 6:47, najrut wrote: > >> > But ... is it anyway possible to form tanru with pro-sumti included ? >> >> It is possible as Jorge Llamb=EDas explained, with "me " which is= a >> conversion to the selbri "x1 is ". >> >> dei me mi notci >> This [is a] Kevinish message. >> >> -- >> Kevin Reid >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/U_CQyzqFZUUJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. --20cf3056409f45f86d04b13ba4fa Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't think it's actually saying "mine". =A0From what I= understand {lo mi gerku} is equivalent to {lo gerku pe mi}. =A0{pe} can= =A0imply ownership when context would give that impression, but really = it only means association.

e.g. {lo mi mamta} =3D {lo mamta pe mi} =3D "the mother= associated with me". =A0I don't own her. =A0She is just associate= d with me.=A0
but {lo mi re'azda} =3D {lo re'azda pe mi} = =3D "my house". =A0That last "=3D" isn't true stric= tly, it's just inferred from context. =A0It could also be "that ho= use I sold (because I'm a realtor talking to a co-worker)", etc...=

As for your original question. =A0The difference is tha= t {me mi} is saying "one of those things that are mi". =A0So tech= nically (IMO):
lo mi gerku cu xamgu =3D the dog that is associate= d with me is good
lo me mi gerku cu xamgu =3D the dog that is associated with one of the= things that is "me" is good. =A0(though really "one of"= ; is too strict since we're using {lo})

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:14 AM, najrut <ruler11post@gmail.com> wrote:
=
This makes things even more strange.
Now tell me what is the difference= between
"lo mi gerku cu xamgu" and "lo me mi gerk= u cu xamgu" ?
The first one is translated as
"lo any/some m= i gerku dog(s) [of] I, me)2 cu is/does =AB3xamgu being good=BB3]1"
and the second one as
"lo any/some (3me amongst those that are= mi I, me [type-of] gerku dog(s))3)2 cu is/does =AB4xamgu being good=BB4]1&= quot;

Yes, "lo mi gerku" meaning "my dog" is qui= te handy, but why it breaks the logic of anything learnt before ?
mi gerku means "I'm a dog" and when it is used as a sumt= i in the phrase
<lo mi gerku cu xamgu>=A0
it = must mean <"I'm a dog" is good> whatever that means.

"me mi gerku" (my dog) has much more sense as= it clear resembles "prenu gerku" (person's dog).
<= br>
I feel that the "rule" of transforming "I am&q= uot; into "mine" when adding "lo" is absolutely alien t= o other lojbanic rules.

On Thursday, August 4, 2011 6:10:49 PM UTC+4, Ke= vin Reid wrote:
On Aug 4, 2011, at 6:47, najrut wrote:

> But ... is it anyway possible to form tanru with pro-sumti included= ?

It is possible as Jorge Llamb=EDas explained, with "me <su= mti>" which is a conversion to the selbri "x1 is <sumti>= ".

=A0 dei =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 me mi =A0 =A0notci
=A0 This [is a] Kevinish m= essage. =A0

--
Kevin Reid =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0<http://switchb.org/kpreid/>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.= google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/U_CQyzqFZUUJ.

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--20cf3056409f45f86d04b13ba4fa--