Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:57819) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RVWUB-00088j-JU; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:49:15 -0800 Received: by vbbfs19 with SMTP id fs19sf7216451vbb.16 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:49:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LKuwglEksDVPFfIyvE2hYzH6bnwDDsS16EGXCAfIryg=; b=zhcGd2jGkNkOo4Z+VP0TGnaz14WXhnLXMqg/tZNQdoOCU8opjcTc5geTvFw2HAZZCu mJMR4K9eScQNFNy1P6nkWQZGh6kryg+6TdBvuXjsPgNaeti1M91sHsfztb/XSeDS8y/a UQkfYaWS6CHBQHcptsjzXU5oTbxCZqIxXScKc= Received: by 10.52.179.3 with SMTP id dc3mr16983729vdc.12.1322606940310; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:49:00 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.155.209 with SMTP id t17ls3659899vcw.2.gmail; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.174.114 with SMTP id br18mr32711581vdc.2.1322606939737; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.174.114 with SMTP id br18mr32711580vdc.2.1322606939730; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vw0-f64.google.com (mail-vw0-f64.google.com [209.85.212.64]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8si18132724vdu.2.2011.11.29.14.48.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of janek37@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.64 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.64; Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so3782425vbb.19 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:48:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.107.196 with SMTP id he4mr16933955vdb.7.1322606939671; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by q9g2000yqe.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:48:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:48:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/11.04 Chromium/14.0.835.202 Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: I want an apple From: ianek To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of janek37@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.64 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 1612 I think it's because in natural languages "I want an apple" is a mental abbreviation. Lojban tries to deal with implicit things like that. As you quoted, wanting an object is wanting to possess or do something else with an object. So it's more logical definition to define {djica} in one way instead of making it ambiguous. You have to simple ways to overcome it: {mi jai djica lo plise}, {mi ctidji lo plise}, {mi djica tu'a lo plise}, {mi djica lo nu citka lo plise} or even {mi plisyctidji} :) mu'o mi'e ianek On Nov 29, 11:19=A0pm, MorphemeAddict wrote: > Someone (David Gowers?) recently (Aug. 17, 2011?) wrote: > > "You have an object in troci x2, but troci x2 is an abstraction. This is > the same problem as with {mi djica lo plise} -- you don't desire an apple= , > you desire to possess an apple, or eat an apple... This is known as sumti > raising. You need to put an abstraction in x2, then you will not be > sumti-raising -- and will make sense, besides." > > I've wondered about this before. Why is wanting an object called > sumti-raising? Why must the object (x2?) of {djica} be an abstraction? Is > it simply because that's how the word was defined? If so, why was it > defined that way? > > stevo --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.