Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:51674) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Rc4k2-0006Uq-VB; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:43 -0800 Received: by yenm3 with SMTP id m3sf4712238yen.16 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=8HRxuXTddJ3DhPSWN+o7bHJpzvv7sl/f2VocUz6UXFE=; b=v1q7yiK5mkHIgtmcqa3SOFTXTQgS2ZbMPlXjf3cDUFdYoJMjGuuj05CvHDyCiJFRl3 TnyIVzlytRBWyUSZCgufnbdCc9Fy0Lauh7m483mRB0pxsicz/SZX9KUvNw9dvRPD0HLX eLjzrU1YaULG/EhpX9XBmWa47hhYdbnYprIoo= Received: by 10.236.131.110 with SMTP id l74mr5014413yhi.19.1324168572559; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:12 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.88.2 with SMTP id q2ls10643692anl.7.gmail; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.176.33 with SMTP id a21mr12923249yhm.2.1324168571936; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.176.33 with SMTP id a21mr12923244yhm.2.1324168571914; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f178.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id at5si1072036igc.0.2011.12.17.16.36.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lorddraqo@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.178; Received: by obcuy5 with SMTP id uy5so1277940obc.37 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.159.99 with SMTP id xb3mr7252272obb.8.1324168571498; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.17.6 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:36:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 18:36:11 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Curses! From: Lee Carlson To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lorddraqo@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lorddraqo@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lorddraqo@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9399db153b1ef04b4530522 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 5756 --14dae9399db153b1ef04b4530522 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If you go to the lojban site you will find a couple of discussions on curses, and swearing. Since the language is based on creating logically verifiable statements, most curses simply do *not* parse, at least not IN lojban. The closest you may come is *do bebna* (you are a fool) though that does not fulfill the emotional catharsis of calling somebody a "fucking retard" even if it is logically equivalent. mi'e brais On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Anton Golov wrote: > On 17 December 2011 16:55, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > I don't believe a word of that. Especially the part about "intellectual > > exercise". > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Lee Carlson > wrote: > >> > >> This has been revisited from time-to-time and the outcome is always that > >> curses and such are deeply invested in cultural context. As such a > language > >> that is designed to be culturally neutral does not provide curses > outside of > >> the cultural context of the particular user. For anyone is raised with > >> lojban as their primary language, the concept of cursing, and expletives > >> will likely be an intellectual exercise, rather than an emotional > outburst. > >> > >> mi'e brais > >> > > It seems more likely that if people were raised with Lojban as their > primary language, they would develop a vocabulary of curses and > euphemisms of their own. > > mi'e jesyspa > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > > -- The World is a magical place, waiting for our senses to grow sharper. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --14dae9399db153b1ef04b4530522 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you go to the lojban site you wi= ll find a couple of discussions on curses, and swearing. Since the language= is based on creating logically verifiable statements, most curses simply d= o not parse, at least not IN lojban. The closest you may come is = do bebna (you are a fool) though that does not fulfill the emotional ca= tharsis of calling somebody a "fucking retard" even if it is logi= cally equivalent.

mi'e brais

On Sat, Dec 17,= 2011 at 12:18 PM, Anton Golov <kdesevis@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17 December 2011 16:55, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't believe a word of that. Especially the part about "in= tellectual
> exercise".
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Lee Carlson <lorddraqo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This has been revisited from time-to-time and the outcome is alway= s that
>> curses and such are deeply invested in cultural context. As such a= language
>> that is designed to be culturally neutral does not provide curses = outside of
>> the cultural context of the particular user. For anyone is raised = with
>> lojban as their primary language, the concept of cursing, and expl= etives
>> will likely be an intellectual exercise, rather than an emotional = outburst.
>>
>> mi'e brais
>>

It seems more likely that if people were raised with Lojban as their<= br> primary language, they would develop a vocabulary of curses and
euphemisms of their own.

mi'e jesyspa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.




--
The World i= s a magical place, waiting for our senses to grow sharper.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--14dae9399db153b1ef04b4530522--