Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:44968) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RbwBw-0004Pi-Bx; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:56 -0800 Received: by yhgg71 with SMTP id g71sf5715530yhg.16 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=8zhDTqkVbyWAK0swzkU061TZKR3Vpo2tLxjZOcjxYDs=; b=MjvjIqc4/kOGv/NHJI/Oo4gy+vUEAHlvXSkhmgrbhFQ/O4u298PYhdLK89AnLTTIE5 ZoFlopve1sWBRxxL8cyPO8zEHbYB++oMP8dBB5/csiEnJ9lVLae7Zv5gxSEUldCPi1i9 duFCCzH3578Faif8tvWlhvyhGvG9yUnU28Wt8= Received: by 10.236.131.110 with SMTP id l74mr4633654yhi.19.1324135721386; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:41 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.184.32 with SMTP id l32ls9472506anp.6.gmail; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.196.35 with SMTP id y35mr7812850anp.4.1324135714309; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.196.35 with SMTP id y35mr7812849anp.4.1324135714292; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gy0-f192.google.com (mail-gy0-f192.google.com [209.85.160.192]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n75si3905644yhe.3.2011.12.17.07.28.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dankaivel@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.192 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.192; Received: by ghbg21 with SMTP id g21so4282646ghb.9 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.154.228 with SMTP id h64mr684238yhk.12.1324135714232; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by x7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:28:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201112170126.15625.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <8ba802a9-d42a-404e-8564-fd0c90590285@z12g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <201112170126.15625.phma@phma.optus.nu> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; es-ES; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010031218 Firefox/3.0.19,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <52b0172f-dbf7-4cc8-8e16-cd2a7ce899e5@x7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: how correct is this phrase From: Dank To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: dankaivel@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dankaivel@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.192 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dankaivel@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 1698 it means what it says, seprije could probably go as well as selprije. i know gasnu is an agent, so i am agree that if the sumti start with lo, it has to be a person or an agent. But since i am using "le" i was hoping that any kind of stuff can go in there, any abstraction or bridi starting with "le", since i supose "le" is to say that i describe the thing this way, so it should be to describe in almost any way about using condi, since is in "le" i guess is allowed to use deepness as a descriptor, regardless of whatever it might mean deep as a descriptor of sanji Anyway, if the phrase is not correct, how could the same thing can be said in another way??? On 17 dic, 00:26, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Saturday 17 December 2011 01:08:06 Dank wrote: > > > hi, i was just wondering how correct is this phrase, > > > le nu condi sanji pensi cu gasnu le banli seprije > > It's syntactically correct, though I'm not sure what it means. > *"seprije" is run together. We normally don't run words together unless all of > them are cmavo. > *The subject of "gasnu" is an agent; you have an abstraction (which is like a > subordinate clause) there. "le pensi cu gasnu" makes sense. > *Are you talking about thoughts of deep-sea divers? > > Pierre > > -- > Don't buy a French car in Holland. It may be a citroen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.