Received: from mail-ey0-f189.google.com ([209.85.215.189]:49604) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S4pmd-0004Nq-0k; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:30:17 -0800 Received: by eaan10 with SMTP id n10sf4809984eaa.16 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:30:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lojban-beginners+bncCMHEmaCOBhDyldf6BBoEULSAsA@googlegroups.com designates 10.204.152.149 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.204.152.149; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lojban-beginners+bncCMHEmaCOBhDyldf6BBoEULSAsA@googlegroups.com designates 10.204.152.149 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban-beginners+bncCMHEmaCOBhDyldf6BBoEULSAsA@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=lojban-beginners+bncCMHEmaCOBhDyldf6BBoEULSAsA@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.204.152.149]) by 10.204.152.149 with SMTP id g21mr6834942bkw.19.1331022603035 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:30:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=kuYUUggVuLgH/zWGH+t+24COYc0q857zcPN2k2sUaGA=; b=hawYnDxRKAESaEbed5FtT56hKEKss69R2YyGHd6ib/Z7ZM/uK4i2TF4/ON+4aGkj44 wcUkygKPOrJK5Xvww7TASiEwfOXIttPswFBSjRyJMSgoZoB1tho2CHhppHnWqzfRQXfb l074778x6T5jCimPrq4KJvd2oVMJO2cRAO0Fw= Received: by 10.204.152.149 with SMTP id g21mr2022387bkw.19.1331022578457; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:29:38 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.143.211 with SMTP id w19ls324727bku.9.gmail; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.133.213 with SMTP id g21mr1850162bkt.3.1331022577525; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.133.213 with SMTP id g21mr1850161bkt.3.1331022577479; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f52.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20si21037868bko.3.2012.03.06.00.29.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.52; Received: by lahi5 with SMTP id i5so5594086lah.25 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 10.112.86.198 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.86.198; Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.86.198]) by 10.112.86.198 with SMTP id r6mr11169325lbz.53.1331022577155 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:29:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.86.198 with SMTP id r6mr9164799lbz.53.1331022577066; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.148.225 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:29:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <53e56d0b-83b4-4575-80d8-c1e8a8708d15@q11g2000vbu.googlegroups.com> <201203052204.54233.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 01:29:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Just having trouble putting a sentence together in general... Think I figured it out From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554d6dce4e3c704ba8ed7d0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 4834 --bcaec554d6dce4e3c704ba8ed7d0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:10 AM, .arpis. wrote: > >> In the past, I've found the "How to use xorlo" page misleading at >> best, and incorrect at worst. I recall xorxes contradicting it. >> >> As I understand, the BPFK section on gadri is the most accurate >> reference to do with {lo} and {le}: >> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+gadri >> >> {lo broda} is defined as {zo'e noi ke'a broda} >> {le broda} is defined as {zo'e noi mi ke'a do skicu lo ka ce'u broda > > In this particular case, all three of the sources I quoted agree. In fact, every authoritative work on the meaning of Lojban {le} agrees, because the meaning of {le} has been exactly the same since the beginning of the language, or at the very least since before I joined the community back in the 90's. The relatively recent xorlo change only stripped the default quantifiers from {le}, it didn't in any way change it's meaning. To illustrate the above fact, here's what your source says about the meaning of {le}: "le (LE) Specific article. It converts a selbri, selecting its first argument, into a sumti. The resulting expression refers *specifically* to an individual or individuals that the speaker has in mind and which the speaker describes as fitting the first argument of the selbri." -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --bcaec554d6dce4e3c704ba8ed7d0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Jonathan= Jones <eyeonus@g= mail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:10 A= M, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
In the past, I've found the "How to use xorlo" page misleadin= g at
best, and incorrect at worst. I recall xorxes contradicting it.

As I understand, the BPFK section on gadri is the most accurate
reference to do with {lo} and {le}:
http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+gadri

{lo broda} is defined as {zo'e noi ke'a broda}
{le broda} is defined as {zo'e noi mi ke'a do skicu lo ka ce'u = broda

In this particular case, al= l three of the sources I quoted agree. In fact, every authoritative work on= the meaning of Lojban {le} agrees, because the meaning of {le} has been ex= actly the same since the beginning of the language, or at the very least si= nce before I joined the community back in the 90's. The relatively rece= nt xorlo change only stripped the default quantifiers from {le}, it didn= 9;t in any way change it's meaning.

To illustrate the above fact, here's what your source says about th= e meaning of {le}:

"le (LE) Specific article. It converts a sel= bri, selecting its first argument, into a sumti. The resulting expression r= efers specifically to an individual or individuals that the speaker = has in mind and which the speaker describes as fitting the first argument o= f the selbri."

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Lu= ke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--bcaec554d6dce4e3c704ba8ed7d0--