Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:52334) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S4xr1-00027n-KM; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:07:16 -0800 Received: by yenm3 with SMTP id m3sf5607568yen.16 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:07:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lojban-beginners+bncCOmJ3NibERCkiNn6BBoEa9vKeA@googlegroups.com designates 10.224.27.75 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.27.75; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lojban-beginners+bncCOmJ3NibERCkiNn6BBoEa9vKeA@googlegroups.com designates 10.224.27.75 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban-beginners+bncCOmJ3NibERCkiNn6BBoEa9vKeA@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=lojban-beginners+bncCOmJ3NibERCkiNn6BBoEa9vKeA@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.27.75]) by 10.224.27.75 with SMTP id h11mr15707298qac.5.1331053628705 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:07:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=M7DddW4JyPaZZ67OkIyLbcGXKBXSZtrlfBACNz5qiGk=; b=WxB6YMyfkAtgdS25I2LUDzG7Qx50XDG/Mkh7YysNnbbDTsGgkbz4QEa18eWBzbNGDj xBHSECx8MDyR4BqO3EipKI64UczO12TiYukYsT/rLeMfk2XAzGhwT5flnoomG8mdGBRU zI7myPrhE0JxDv0vbp9tA5fCALjPmP/i8kSjE= Received: by 10.224.27.75 with SMTP id h11mr4679422qac.5.1331053604220; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:06:44 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.187.71 with SMTP id cv7ls1320680qab.8.gmail; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:06:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.183.234 with SMTP id q70mr2042501yhm.2.1331053602968; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:06:42 -0800 (PST) From: RexScientiarum To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <20043302.5515.1331053602321.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynnk21> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Just having trouble putting a sentence together in general... Think I figured it out MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: amt2839@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amt2839@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=amt2839@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5514_5649165.1331053602320" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 5442 ------=_Part_5514_5649165.1331053602320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Again, we come to the issue of {cu}. My understanding is that it is still correct to use it as I did, just not necessary. I don't care if I am being wordy at this point, I am more concerned with being flat out wrong. Would it be 'necessary' to use {cu} if there was something there that could be confused as a tanru (I mean assuming I didn't want to restructure the whole sentence)? On Monday, March 5, 2012 7:51:45 PM UTC-6, aionys wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:24 PM, RexScientiarum wrote: > >> I am a little confused as to how I can make this sentence: >> >> I use a microscope to look at the microbe. >> >> >> I guess this is the best way to say this: >> >> .i mi cu zgana lo jurme le cmactatci >> > > That is exactly right, although you don't need cu in that sentence- mi > cannot form tanru. > > >> At first I used pilno to say that I would use the microscope more like >> I had originally envisioned the sentence in English but then I >> couldn't figure out I could use that to say I 'used' the microscope to >> 'look' at the microbe. There aren't enough sumti x spaces for that or >> any direct way to relate that x1(I) am using x2(microscope) in manner >> x3(to look at)....... a microbe..... right? >> > > If you really want to use pilno as your selbri: > > pilno: x1 uses/employs x2 for purpose x3. > The x3 of pilno is what the x2 is being used by x1 for. This is usually an > event, such as the event of looking at microbes. > > I use a-microscope for-purpose an-event-of observing a-microbe > mi pilno lo cmactatci lonu zgana lo jurme > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/lBsv7xZMH3EJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. ------=_Part_5514_5649165.1331053602320 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Again, we come to the issue of {cu}.  My understanding is that it is s= till correct to use it as I did, just not necessary.  I don't car= e if I am being wordy at this point, I am more concerned with being flat ou= t wrong.

Would it be 'necessary' to use {cu} if  there wa= s something there that could be confused as a tanru (I mean assuming I didn= 't want to restructure the whole sentence)?

On Monday, March 5, 2012= 7:51:45 PM UTC-6, aionys wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:24 PM, RexScientiarum=  wrote:
I am a little confused as to how I can make this sentence:

I use a microscope to look at the microbe.


I guess this is the best way to say this:

.i mi cu zgana lo jurme le cmactatci

That is exact= ly right, although you don't need cu in that sentence- mi cannot form tanru= .
 
At first I used pilno to say that I would use the microscope more like
I had originally envisioned the sentence in English but then I
couldn't figure out I could use that to say I 'used' the microscope to
'look' at the microbe.  There aren't enough sumti x spaces for that or=
any direct way to relate that x1(I) am using x2(microscope) in manner
x3(to look at)....... a microbe..... right?

If you really want to use pilno as your selbr= i:

pilno: x1 uses/employs x2 for purpose x3.
The x3 of pilno is what the x2 is being used by x1 for. This i= s usually an event, such as the event of looking at microbes.

I use a-microscope for-purpose an-event-of observing a-microbe
mi pilno lo cmactatci lonu zgana lo jurme

--
mu'o = mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi= patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/lBsv7xZMH3EJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_5514_5649165.1331053602320--