Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:45755) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S5A3k-0007C2-76; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:09:17 -0800 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1sf6098396wer.16 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:09:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=0Y4oQXj96z/Wa3taOtLA6vhU9j1r8o8Op/CzJsa+4/4=; b=chpW6IbRvRv/z+SXJzursRDct1Z/9EM+wCEuYeDrq4sB4OlqypQ9hFy8uMBP2kGd11 edC/4oZSjKOHcSzXnxBmbSsfn0WYd3J5pEjXbTTfVYntouDUEUlK7eMNauciXP7b0Uhf oQrqVuxbf0ea5rFMS6LnyfVHrnAIgieYfx2c4= Received: by 10.180.99.65 with SMTP id eo1mr414630wib.0.1331100517423; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:08:37 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.6.74 with SMTP id y10ls8196657wiy.4.canary; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:08:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.75.179 with SMTP id d19mr79887wiw.2.1331100516054; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:08:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.75.179 with SMTP id d19mr79886wiw.2.1331100516038; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:08:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex8si6109182wib.1.2012.03.06.22.08.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:08:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.180; Received: by wibhm9 with SMTP id hm9so4326387wib.39 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:08:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.14.37 with SMTP id m5mr1355668wic.19.1331100515905; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:08:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.91.68 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 22:08:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8929c895-6264-4ae8-b9ff-1d3b3094d404@gr6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <201203040828.29096.phma@phma.optus.nu> <979cda85-1352-4c77-8d2a-de697d68b7af@v2g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 23:08:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Let's do something like this for Lojban! From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04138ca769305804baa0fdfc X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 10278 --f46d04138ca769305804baa0fdfc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis < felipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 March 2012 19:32, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > to minimize confusion, > > all the uses of tV that referred to a location are now vVku. > > > > {viku} is not a sumti, so that is not a genuine substitution. It just > happens that > the textual substitution gives > {mi zvati viku} =3D=3D=3D {mi vi zvati} =3D=3D=3D {viku mi zvati}, > which might work. > > (I have not made up my mind about how to read space/time tenses in selbri > that have places for position/time) > > Anyway, please consider the possible confusion of taking {viku} to be a > sumti. > To someone unacquainted with lojban, all evidence in the text points in > that > direction. Particularly misleading is > > 36. sy: mi zvati ma > > cy: doi.sam. do zvati vaku > where a sumti-question is answered with a tense. > Right then. In that case, I'm going back to the way I had it, because I find the idea of readers confusing something which is not a sumti with something that is entirely unacceptable, and I am also unwilling to risk the confusion caused by referring to both places and things with tV. (Panel 12 would be {tu zvati tu}, for example.) > Below some random things I spotted. > > > 56. lo mi'a bersa cu zvati viku .i lo go'i cu barda zmadu lo vu nanla .= i > se > > cmene la.bil. .i la.bil. bersa mi'a .i lo go'i xabju kansa mi'a lo mi'a > > zdani > > > .i se > > cmene la.bil. > > la -> zo > Just when you think you've gotten them all, another one pops up. > > .i lo go'i xabju kansa mi'a lo mi'a > > zdani > > This sentence has no selbri. Maybe you wanted > {.i lo go'i cu xabju kansa mi'a lo mi'a zdani}? > Yes. > Anyway, I am not sure {lo mi'a zdani} is a kansa3, but it is xabju2, > {.i lo go'i cu xabju be lo mi'a zdani be'o kansa mi'a}. > No, not exactly, k3 of this would be {lonu xabju lo mi'a zdani}, but I'm not sure introducing abstractors at all in this is a good idea. Thinking about it > Anynyway, the simple > {.i lo go'i cu xabju kansa mi'a} > looks equally informative to me. > No, it doesn't say anything about where they live together. My friend Tom does not live in the same house as his mother, but he does live in the same city, so this information is in fact important. Thinking about it, I think I'll change it to {lo go'i .e mi'a kansa xabju lo mi'a zdani}. > > 57. cy: lo do tixnu cu zvati ma > > by: go'i tu .i re vu nixli cu tixnu mi'a > > Here you left the {tu} to denote a place, in contrast with 36. Overlooked= ? > Yes. Thank you. > > As I said, I actually prefer this {tu} version. > > By the way, why did you choose to always answer sumti-questions with > a full bridi, as opposed to a simple sumti? > ? > > 72. mi nanca li civo .ije lo mi nakspe goi la.sam. nanca li cixa .i lo > go'i > > cu zmadu mi lo se nanca li re .i lo mi'a tixnu cu zmadu lo mi'a bersa l= o > se > > nanca li vo > > > > zmadu3 is a dimension, so it should be {lo ka ce'u nanca makau kei}. > Since this is the last utterance, and it appears to be decipherable, > you might want to play with the reader and leave it like that. A more > friendly alternative is to use a tanru like {nanca zmadu}, as in 56. > z3 is not a dimension. It is a property or quantity. lo se nanca is a quantity. > mu'o > mi'e .asiz. > --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. --f46d04138ca769305804baa0fdfc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Felipe Gon=E7alv= es Assis <f= elipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6 March 2012 19:32, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> to minimize confusion,
> all the uses of tV that referred to a location are now vVku.
>

{viku} is not a sumti, so that is not a genuine substitution. It just=
happens that
the textual substitution gives
=A0{mi zvati viku} =3D=3D=3D {mi vi zvati} =3D=3D=3D {viku mi zvati},
which might work.

(I have not made up my mind about how to read space/time tenses in selbri that have places for position/time)

Anyway, please consider the possible confusion of taking {viku} to be a sum= ti.
To someone unacquainted with lojban, all evidence in the text points in tha= t
direction. Particularly misleading is
> 36. sy: mi zvati ma
> =A0 =A0 =A0cy: doi.sam. do zvati vaku
where a sumti-question is answered with a tense.

Right then. In that case,=A0 I'm going back to the way I had it, b= ecause I find the idea of readers confusing something which is not a sumti = with something that is entirely unacceptable, and I am also unwilling to ri= sk the confusion caused by referring to both places and things with tV. (Pa= nel 12 would be {tu zvati tu}, for example.)
=A0
Below some random things I spotted.

> 56. lo mi'a bersa cu zvati viku .i lo go'i cu barda zmadu lo v= u nanla .i se
> cmene la.bil. .i la.bil. bersa mi'a .i lo go'i xabju kansa mi&= #39;a lo mi'a
> zdani

> .i se
> cmene la.bil.

la -> zo

Just when you think you've gotten = them all, another one pops up.
=A0
> .i lo go'i xabju kansa mi'a lo mi'a
> zdani

This sentence has no selbri. Maybe you wanted
=A0{.i lo go'i cu xabju kansa mi'a lo mi'a zdani}?

Yes.
=A0
Anyway, I am not sure {lo mi'a zdani} is a kansa3, but it is xabju2, =A0{.i lo go'i cu xabju be lo mi'a zdani be'o kansa mi'a}.=

No, not exactly, k3 of this would be {lonu xabju = lo mi'a zdani}, but I'm not sure introducing abstractors at all in = this is a good idea.

Thinking about it
=A0
Anynyway, the simple
=A0{.i lo go'i cu xabju kansa mi'a}
looks equally informative to me.

No, it doesn'= t say anything about where they live together. My friend Tom does not live = in the same house as his mother, but he does live in the same city, so this= information is in fact important.

Thinking about it, I think I'll change it to {lo go'i .e mi'= ;a kansa xabju lo mi'a zdani}.
=A0
> 57. cy: lo do tixnu cu zvati ma
> =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 by: go'i tu .i re vu nixli cu tixnu mi'a

Here you left the {tu} to denote a place, in contrast with 36. Overlo= oked?

Yes. Thank you.

As I said, I actually prefer this {tu} version.

By the way, why did you choose to always answer sumti-questions with
a full bridi, as opposed to a simple sumti?

?
= =A0
> 72. mi nanca li civo .ije lo mi nakspe goi la.sam. n= anca li cixa .i lo go'i
> cu zmadu mi lo se nanca li re .i lo mi'a tixnu cu zmadu lo mi'= a bersa lo se
> nanca li vo
>

zmadu3 is a dimension, so it should be {lo ka ce'u nanca makau ke= i}.
Since this is the last utterance, and it appears to be decipherable,
you might want to play with the reader and leave it like that. A more
friendly alternative is to use a tanru like {nanca zmadu}, as in 56.

z3 is not a dimension. It is a property or quantity. lo = se nanca is a quantity.
=A0
mu'o
mi'e .asiz.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e&= #39;ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
= (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--f46d04138ca769305804baa0fdfc--