Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f61.google.com ([209.85.215.61]:64595) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S8WLd-0005Jr-CK; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:33:35 -0700 Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3sf3304877lag.16 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:33:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GUeaWyvZleEz0JSq4PNr5Ukm1wa4fsckigUHM2ZK4dc=; b=O256HjGSwM65pvZWvi8vqx0YRT+EdUsfOPtk9TlX3NUPZu2RYOALWeht91mQmflE8z CJ7WRj4qGKUUJgM+JpzwbTIIHakYCOm/5sBMYFy97gVB6sfxtvmAilUcmy5TFIxhT/xu njf8eBDfywaa7K9j4DNQ0JdWSEDWnxNksWJ0E= Received: by 10.204.157.150 with SMTP id b22mr137463bkx.7.1331901181555; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:33:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.50.142 with SMTP id z14ls5331415bkf.3.gmail; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.150.90 with SMTP id x26mr231001bkv.6.1331901179536; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.150.90 with SMTP id x26mr231000bkv.6.1331901179479; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cs9si6186061bkb.3.2012.03.16.05.32.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.41; Received: by lagz14 with SMTP id z14so4077299lag.0 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.147.202 with SMTP id tm10mr1896274lab.49.1331901179051; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:32:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.36.1 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:32:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2343119.814.1331896532433.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynkz21> References: <26361784.259.1331827845548.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjw14> <2343119.814.1331896532433.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynkz21> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:32:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Major flaw in Lojban ! (was:Pivotal sentences in Pandunia. How to express them in Lojban ?) To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f235311a73df504bb5b6816 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.4 X-Spam_score_int: -3 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 8463 --e89a8f235311a73df504bb5b6816 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Indeed, it's not a competition. Therefore there are neither victors nor losers. And Lojban is *so* imperfect, in *so* many ways. But it's still fun to learn and use. stevo On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:15 AM, gleki wrote: > Of course I know that Pandunia lacks other nice features. > I want Lojban to be the best in every feature, not most features. It's no= t > a competition. > The victory over other logical projects must be total. > > The question is similar to recent discussion about {kakne} - x1 is capabl= e > of {x2} which accomplishes the requirement of pivotal sentences whereas > many other gismu do not. > {mi cpedu lonu do rinsa [ko'a,zo'e,lo prenu, etc.]} is not the answer. > It's too ambiguous. Where is x3 ? Who are you asking this for ? > It's like {mi kakne lo nu do rinsa mi} - an impractical solution that > could be logically possible. > Compare with {djica} - {mi djica lo nu do rinsa mi} - that *is* within th= e > baseline. > > The major flaw in Lojban is that it cannot compactly express "I ask you t= o > greet me". You have to say > {mi cpedu [fe] lo nu do rinsa [ku] [fi] do} > And here is the lack of compactness (two valsi {do} instead of one). > Even English (not Pandunia !) is better. "I ask you to greet me" - > absolutely no need to repeat the word "you". > > > SO THE MAJOR FLAW OF LOJBAN IS THE LACK OF CONNECTION BETWEEN SUMTI in > many gismu. > I can see only one solution. > {mi cpedu fi do poi rinsa} therefore completely ignoring x2 (the act of > ignoring at least won't break the baseline). > But I'm not sure whether it preserves the needed meaning. > > On Friday, March 16, 2012 10:31:11 AM UTC+4, Oleksii Melnyk wrote: >> >> >> On 15 March 2012 18:10, gleki wrote: >> >>> So the second "sumti" *ti *in *mi peti ti *becomes the first "sumti" of >>> the next construction "ti tshau ta". >>> I wonder whether it's possible to do so in Lojban. May {be} or {.i ri} >>> can do the trick >>> >> >> >Pandunia ... lacks other complex grammatical structures ... >> >> while lojban mandates them. So, in that example, it's hard to ?factor? >> the sumti out of the abstraction. In some specific cases you can get clo= se >> enough with: >> >> 1. common set of sumti with 2 =ABbridi tails=BB - with reversed order, c= ommon >> comes first >> 2. NOI, with the hardcoded semantic >> >> -- >> mi'e lex mu'o >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/uwkF_b01VvIJ. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. --e89a8f235311a73df504bb5b6816 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Indeed, it's not a competition. Therefore there are neither victors nor= losers. And Lojban is *so* imperfect, in *so* many ways. But it's stil= l fun to learn and use.=A0

stevo

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:15 AM, gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> w= rote:
Of course I know that Pandunia lacks other nice features.
I want Lojban= to be the best in every feature, not most features. It's not a competi= tion.=A0
The victory over other logical projects must be total.

The question is similar to recent discussion about {kakne} - = x1 is capable of {x2} which accomplishes the requirement of pivotal sentenc= es whereas many other gismu do not.
{mi cpedu lonu do rinsa [ko&#= 39;a,zo'e,lo prenu, etc.]} is not the answer. It's too ambiguous. W= here is x3 ? Who are you asking this for ?
It's like {mi kakne lo nu do rinsa mi} - an impractical solution t= hat could be=A0logically possible.
Compare with {djica} - {mi dji= ca=A0lo nu do rinsa mi} - that *is* within the baseline.

The major flaw in Lojban is that it cannot compactly express "I a= sk you to greet me". You have to say
{mi cpedu [fe] lo nu do= rinsa [ku] [fi] do}
And here is the lack of compactness (two val= si {do} instead of one).
Even English (not Pandunia !) is better.=A0"I ask you to greet me= " - absolutely no need to repeat the word "you".
<= br>

SO THE MAJOR FLAW OF LOJBAN IS THE LACK OF CON= NECTION BETWEEN SUMTI in many gismu.
I can see only one solution.
{mi cpedu fi do poi rinsa} ther= efore completely ignoring x2 (the act of ignoring at least won't break = the baseline).
But I'm not sure whether it preserves the need= ed meaning.

On Friday, March 16, 2012 10:31:11 AM UTC+4, Oleksii Melnyk wrote:
On 15 Mar= ch 2012 18:10, gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> w= rote:
So the second "sumti" ti in mi peti ti=A0becom= es the first "sumti" of the next construction "ti tshau ta&q= uot;.
I wonder whether it's possible to do so in Lojban. May = {be} or {.i ri} can do the trick

>Pandunia ... lacks other complex grammatical stru= ctures ...

while lojban mandates them. So, in that example, it'= s hard to ?factor? the sumti out of the abstraction. In some specific cases= you can get close enough with:

1. common set of sumti with 2 =ABbridi tails=BB - with reversed order, = common comes first
2. NOI, with the hardcoded semantic

--
mi'e lex mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.= google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/uwkF_b01VvIJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--e89a8f235311a73df504bb5b6816--