Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:54019) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S8ZrY-00081M-PM; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:18:49 -0700 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1sf3550704wer.16 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:18:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=98TP9kGkwG11qhXanB9W47JwZ8mj1vV0XSAWcZ+Uy40=; b=jDzSL9BLKIOlTqkI0yElfmOx2ThVx8xV+DDEYeMztBP8aV3ULMQBdccwWI2erZl1JW oRkLcMICQZlPrGPz+kdrxFG14SuVweLdZj+QccrUJ8RDDpT+a09WPgVkPYUpVaO3omc4 Wq8G1UXtNQhySm9RRnomw18zSxfzXyrB2pgaE= Received: by 10.216.215.29 with SMTP id d29mr138225wep.45.1331914691371; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:18:11 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.199.195 with SMTP id x43ls1599148een.5.gmail; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.143.143 with SMTP id v15mr325140bku.8.1331914690565; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.143.143 with SMTP id v15mr325139bku.8.1331914690537; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com (mail-bk0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8si6810396bka.1.2012.03.16.09.18.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.49; Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id jk13so4597261bkc.22 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:18:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.133.195 with SMTP id g3mr1172403bkt.73.1331914690305; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.119.4 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:18:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:18:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Lojban equivalents of English evidentials. From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce02fa6fca16204bb5e8df1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 3498 --000e0ce02fa6fca16204bb5e8df1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think that's fine. --gejyspa On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, .arpis. wrote: > I often find myself wanting to say things like IIRC, AFAIK, AFAICT, IMO, > etc. > > These seem to correspond pretty well with {ba'a nai}, {su'a} or > {ka'u}, {za'a}, and {pe'i}; however, sometimes it seems to me that > there is more uncertainty conveyed in the English variants. Am I being > malgli, or is it closer to the English to say {ba'a nai ju'o cu'i}? > > -- > mu'o mi'e .arpis. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --000e0ce02fa6fca16204bb5e8df1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=A0 I think that's fine.
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0--= gejyspa


On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at= 8:37 AM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
I often find myself wanting to say things li= ke IIRC, AFAIK, AFAICT, IMO, etc.

These seem to correspond pretty well with {ba'a nai}, {su'a} or
{ka'u}, {za'a}, and {pe'i}; however, sometimes it seems to me t= hat
there is more uncertainty conveyed in the English variants. Am I being
malgli, or is it closer to the English to say {ba'a nai ju'o cu'= ;i}?

--
mu'o mi'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g= roup/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--000e0ce02fa6fca16204bb5e8df1--